Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015862
Original file (20080015862.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	        5 February 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080015862 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his promotion to sergeant first class (SFC), E-7 be reinstated.

2.  The applicant states that he was recently selected for promotion to SFC with a sequence number of "1."  He states that his eligibility to get his promotion was lost due to Military Personnel (MILPER) Message 06-294.  On 20 March [2007], he was told he would be placed on stop loss and he received his Professional Officer Filler Information System (PROFIS) notification.  He states he signed a DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action) on 21 March [2007] requesting to be dropped from voluntary retirement so he could deploy.  He received deployment orders on 5 April [2007].  By late June, he was informed that he would not deploy but he would be retired and would not receive his promotion.  He was notified of his removal from the promotion standing list and that his retirement was being revoked.  He states that a command sergeant major (CSM) told him that an attempt would be made to place him back on promotable status if he took the deployment orders.  He states he has completed the Advanced Noncommissioned Officer Course (ANCOC) and received an Associate in Arts Degree.  While he waited for resolution to his issues, he received orders for a permanent change of station (PCS) to Fort Wainwright, Alaska.  He was later informed that a mistake had been made and he would not be placed back on the promotion list.

3.  The applicant provides a memorandum, subject:  Notification and Acknowledgement of Army Medical Department (AMEDD) Professional Filler Deployment System (PDS) PROFIS; a Personnel Action and a Personnel Action Form Addendum; his orders for deployment in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom, dated 5 April 2007; a memorandum, subject:  Administrative Removal from the Promotion Selection List; his orders revoking his retirement, dated 17 July 2007; his DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report), dated 20 November 2007; his Associate in Arts diploma, dated 8 June 2007; his PCS orders to Fort Wainwright, Alaska, dated 24 October 2007; and his Enlisted Record Brief, dated 30 May 2007.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  After having had prior service in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR), the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 5 April 1988.  He completed the required training and was awarded military occupational specialty 91A (medical specialist).  On 1 May 1992, he was promoted to sergeant, E-5.  He has continued to serve on active duty through a series of reenlistments.

2.  The applicant was promoted to staff sergeant, E-6 on 1 October 1993.

3.  The applicant's voluntary retirement packet is not available.  Information obtained from the U. S. Army Human Resources Command (USAHRC) revealed that his retirement application was approved locally at Fort Sam Houston, TX, and his retirement order was dated 9 February 2007.

4.  The applicant was considered and selected for promotion to SFC, E-7, by the 2007 SFC and Advanced Noncommissioned Officer Course Selection Board.  This selection board convened on 30 January 2007 and adjourned on 21 February 2007.  His Enlisted Record Brief shows he was selected for promotion with an anticipated promotion date of 1 January 2007 with a sequence number  of "1."

5.  On 20 March 2007, the applicant submitted a Personnel Action to request removal from the voluntary retirement program.  He indicated that he was selected by the E-7 promotion board and that he was currently on the Department of the Army promotion list.  His request was approved on an unknown date.

6.  On an unknown date, the applicant was notified of his selection to a position on the PROFIS Deployment System for Operation Iraqi Freedom/Operation Enduring Freedom.  He signed the memorandum on 20 March 2007 acknowledging receipt of his PDS PROFIS notification.  He also acknowledged that he understood that his assignment is to a unit that would deploy.

7.  Headquarters, U.S. Army Medical Department Center and School, Fort Sam Houston, Texas, Orders 095-1107, dated 5 April 2007, show the applicant was assigned to the 86th Medical Combat Support Hospital, Fort Campbell, Kentucky, for deployment in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom with a proceed date of 8 July 2007.

8.  He was awarded an Associate in Arts Degree on 8 June 2007.

9.  In a 12 July 2007 memorandum, the applicant was notified that his name was administratively removed from the SFC promotion list based on his approved retirement.

10.  Headquarters, U.S. Army Medical Department Center and School, Fort Sam Houston, Texas, Orders 198-0123, dated 17 July 2007, revoked the applicant's retirement orders (Orders 040-0114, dated 9 February 2007).

11.  Headquarters, U.S. Army Medical Department Center and School, Fort Sam Houston, Texas, Orders 297-700, dated 24 October 2007, show the applicant was assigned to Fort Wainwright, Alaska, with a reporting date of 10 February 2008.

12.  His Service School Academic Evaluation Report, dated 20 November 2007, shows he completed the AMEDD Noncommissioned Officer Advanced Course on 20 November 2007.

13.  The applicant provided an electronic mail message, dated 25 February 2008, from the Deputy Chief of Enlisted Promotions, Human Resources Command, Alexandria, Virginia.  This office stated the applicant was removed from the promotion list because he had an approved retirement at the time the list was released.  The message indicated that if a Soldier has an approved retirement when a promotion list is released, the Soldier loses the promotion opportunity even if he withdraws the retirement.

14.  Army Regulation 600-8-19 (Enlisted Promotions and Reductions) prescribes policies and procedures governing promotion and reduction of Army enlisted personnel.  Chapter 4 of this regulation provides the rules and steps for managing the Centralized Promotion System to SFC, master sergeant, and sergeant major.  It also provides that the name of any Soldier will be removed from a centralized promotions list who has an approved retirement.

15.  Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), paragraph 12-8d, states that Soldiers who have an approved retirement are in a nonpromotable status.  They will not be promoted unless a request for withdrawal of their retirement application has been approved.

16.  MILPER Message Number 06-294, dated 18 October 2006, subject: Corrected Copy of FY07 SFC Promotion Board Announcement Message, paragraph 4a, states that Soldiers with an approved retirement, regardless of the approval date and reason for submission, would not regain eligibility by withdrawing their retirement after the convening date of the Board.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contended, in effect, that he was initially told he would be placed back on a promotable status if he accepted his deployment orders.  He was later informed that a mistake had been made and he would not be placed back on the promotion list.

2.  The applicant was considered and selected for promotion to SFC by the board that convened on 30 January 2007 and adjourned on 21 February 2007.  

3.  However, the applicant voluntarily submitted a request to be released from active duty.  His request for retirement was approved and retirement orders were published on 9 February 2007, prior to the date the promotion board adjourned.  Therefore, the applicant was erroneously considered by the board and, as a result, he was administratively removed from the SFC promotion list.

4.  The evidence of record shows the applicant submitted a request for removal from the voluntary retirement program in March 2007.

5.   Guidance provided in MILPER Message 06-294 directed that Soldiers would not regain eligibility by withdrawing their retirement after the convening date of the Board.  Therefore, there is no basis for reinstating the applicant's promotion to SFC.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x____  ____x____  ____x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ________xxx_________________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080015862



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080015862



5


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003382

    Original file (20130003382.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    c. When Military Personnel (MILPER) Message Number 08-033, subject: (Updated) AAA-294 Enlisted Promotion Report – Automatic List Integration Section for Staff Sergeant) was issued on 1 February 2008, he was never informed of its provisions and he was not aware of any action by the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC) to put him on the standing list for promotion to SSG/E-6. The company commander, first sergeant, and the battalion command sergeant major formed negative opinions of him...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040003280C070208

    Original file (20040003280C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Title 10, U. S. Code, section 619(a)(5)(c)(2)(C) states that the Secretary of the military department concerned may, by regulation, preclude from consideration by a selection board by which he would otherwise be eligible to be considered, an officer who has an established separation date that is within 90 days after the date the promotion board is convened. Paragraph 1-10e(1) stated that officers whose established separation or retirement date was within 90 days after the date on which the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070000079

    Original file (20070000079.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 28 June 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070000079 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. There is no evidence in his military personnel records to show he was considered or selected for promotion to SFC/E-7 or that he attained promotion list status. The evidence shows that the applicant was serving in the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017151

    Original file (20140017151.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Requests for promotion orders for ADOS Soldiers recommended for promotion by a TPU promotion selection board must be submitted to the appropriate RSC." The selection board convened on or about 7 August 2012 and considered Soldiers for promotion as shown below: * non-mobilized IRR, IMA, and Standby Reserve (Active List) Soldiers * mobilized IRR, IMA, and Standby Reserve (Active List) Soldiers to the ranks of SFC through SGM * ADOS Soldiers to the ranks of SSG through SGM that entered ADOS...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001276

    Original file (20120001276.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Prior to attendance, the applicant requested deferment due to an injury. d. On 17 October 2011, the applicant contacted RAAB to request a new class date. He provided copies of: * Request for Orders, dated 16 February 2012 pertaining to his training at Camp Shelby * A list of his travel vouchers in the Defense Travel System for the period 2008 to 2012 * Orders 071-003, Fort Gordon, Georgia, dated 12 March 2010 with amendment assigning him to Afghanistan with a report date of 6 May 2010 *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008880

    Original file (20130008880.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * he was fully qualified to be considered for promotion by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2008 MSG Promotion Selection Board; however, he was not considered for promotion to MSG because he was under an erroneous flagging action * he was approved for consideration by the next Department of the Army (DA) Enlisted Standby Advisory Board (STAB), which convened 29 January 2008 * he strongly believes the STAB selected him for promotion; however, since the erroneous flag was not removed...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016992

    Original file (20130016992.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states at the time of his application he was in the medical evaluation board (MEB) process. The applicant provides: * U.S. Army Physical Evaluation Board (PEB), Fort Sam Houston, TX Memorandum for the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), dated 17 April 2013 * Human Resources Command (HRC) Memorandum for U.S. Army, Promotion Work Centers, dated 18 April 2013, subject: Department of the Army Promotion Point Cutoff Scores for 1 May 2013 and Junior Enlisted Issues for the Active...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070017398

    Original file (20070017398.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provided the following additional documentary evidence in support of her application: a. DA Form 2627 (Record of Proceedings Under Article 15, UCMJ), dated 12 September 2006; b. DA Form 2627-2 (Record of Supplementary Action Under Article 15, UCMJ), dated 25 October 2006; c. DA Form 2166-8 (Noncommissioned Officer Evaluation Report), dated 5 December 2006; d. Extract of Army Regulation 27-10 (Military Justice), dated 16 November 2005; e. Two Memorandums for Record (MFR), dated...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016275

    Original file (20080016275.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record shows that the applicant was promoted to SSG on 1 September 2002. He was accordingly scheduled to attend BNCOC; however, due to his surgery, he requested a deferment in July 2003 of his August 2003 BNCOC class. However, he provided no evidence to show he informed anyone between November 2003 and August 2004 (when he deployed) that he was medically cleared to attend BNCOC.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075611C070403

    Original file (2002075611C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 1 July 1974, the applicant submitted an application for voluntary retirement (DA Form 2339) requesting that he be retired on 31 December 1974, in the rank and pay grade of SFC/E-7. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded: The regulation, in effect at the time, required individuals promoted to the grade of E-7, E-8, or E-9 to incur a 2 year...