Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017167
Original file (20110017167.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	    23 February 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110017167 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show in:

* Item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) the addition of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM)
* Item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) the entry "Disability, Permanent"

2.  The applicant states:

* he was awarded the ARCOM, but it is not on his DD Form 214
* he was placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL), but later he was permanently retired

3.  The applicant provides no additional documentation.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of 


justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant served in the Regular Army from 15 November 2002 through 3 January 2006 when he was retired and placed on the TDRL by reason of temporary disability.  Item 13 of the DD Form 214 he was issued at the time does not show the ARCOM.

3.  Permanent Order Number 9-05, issued by Headquarters, 7th Transportation Group, Fort Eustis, VA, dated 9 January 2006, awarded the applicant the ARCOM for exceptionally meritorious service during the period 7 April 2003 to
3 January 2006.

4.  Orders D326-06, issued by the U.S. Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA), Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC, dated
21 November 2008, removed the applicant from the TDRL and permanently retired him with a 60% disability rating.

5.  The U.S. Army Physical Disability Evaluation System (PDES) is governed by Title 10, U.S. Code, chapter 61, which provides the Secretaries of the Military Departments with authority to retire or separate members when the Secretary finds that they are unfit to perform their military duties because of physical disability.  The statute is implemented by Department of Defense (DoD) Directive 1332.18, DoD Instructions 1332.38 and 1332.39, and Army Regulation 635-40.

	a.  Four factors determine whether a Soldier's disposition is fit for duty, separation, permanent retirement, or temporary retirement:  whether the Soldier can perform in his/her MOS; the rating percentage; the stability of the disabling condition; and years of active service.

	b.  Temporary disability retirement occurs if the Soldier is found unfit and entitled to permanent disability retirement except that the disability is not stable for rating purposes.  "Stable for rating purposes" refers to whether the condition will change within the next five years so as to warrant a different disability rating.

	c.  When placed on the TDRL, the law requires the Soldier undergo a periodic medical reexamination within 18 months at a minimum followed by PDES 


reevaluation.  The Soldier may be retained on the TDRL or a final determination may be made.  While the law provides for a maximum tenure of 5 years on the TDRL, there is no entitlement to be retained for the entire period.  If the Soldier is determined to be permanently disabled, the USAPDA issues orders removing him/her from the TDRL for permanent retirement.

6.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents that must be prepared for soldiers on retirement, discharge, release from active duty service, or control of the Active Army.  It establishes standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  The
DD Form 214 is a summary of a Soldier’s most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active duty.  It further states a DD Form 214 will not be prepared for a Soldier removed from the TDRL.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant was awarded the ARCOM for meritorious service.  Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this award.

2.  The applicant's DD Form 214 was issued when he was retired by reason of temporary disability.  Later, upon reevaluation of his medical condition, he was determined to be permanently disabled and he was removed from the TDRL by appropriate USAPDA orders and permanently retired.  This is the correct process for accomplishing this action.  Army regulation prohibits a DD Form 214 from being prepared for Soldiers removed from the TDRL.  Therefore, there is no basis for granting this portion of the applicant's request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

____X___  ___X____  ___X____  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding to item 13 of his DD Form 214 the Army Commendation Medal.

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to changing Item 28 of his DD Form 214 to show the entry "Disability, permanent."



      ___________X____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110017167



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110017167



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010009

    Original file (20080010009.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was considered by a PEB on 2 May 1975 and determined to be physically unfit with a combined rating of 100% disabled and placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) with reexamination in October 1976. The recommendation of the PEB was approved by the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) and, on 12 October 1978, Orders D199-17, published by the US Army Military Personnel Center, Alexandria, VA, removed him from the TDRL and discharged him from the Army because of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070007507

    Original file (20070007507.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that her promotion was not received upon retirement according to AR 600-8-19, that she did not receive her award until after she retired, and that there is no disability rating identified on her DD Form 214. Orders 05-122, dated 23 August 2006, issued by the Department of the Army, U.S. Army Human Resources Command, St. Louis, Missouri promoted the applicant from pay grade E-6 to pay grade E-7 with an effective date of rank of 23 August 2006. The evidence...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2005 | 20050005901

    Original file (20050005901.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    She is now requesting that the FSM's record be corrected to show he was retained on the TDRL and medically retired at the time of his death given his medical condition was obviously much more serious than the doctors thought when he was removed from the TDRL. The death of the FSM is truly unfortunate, and the applicant's claim is understandable because of the fact the condition for which the FSM was separated was a contributing factor in his death. The PEB findings and recommendations, to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026746

    Original file (20100026746.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record shows the applicant was retired from active duty on 23 September 2008 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-40, paragraph 4-24b(2), by reason of temporary disability with a corresponding SPD code of SFK. Therefore, he received the appropriate reason for separation and SPD code associated with his retirement from active duty and he is not entitled to the requested relief. A member may be found fit for duty, permanently retired, extended on the TDRL, or separated...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012253

    Original file (20090012253.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He served on active duty until 24 September 2004, at which time he was retired under the provisions of paragraph 4-24b [2], Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation), by reason of temporary disability, and placed on the TDRL. The DD Form 214 issued to the applicant upon his separation from active duty on 24 September 2004, and placement on the TDRL, shows he completed 1 year, 7 months, and 15 days of active military service during the period...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008149

    Original file (20120008149.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 1 November 2004, a medical evaluation board (MEB) convened and after consideration of clinical records, laboratory findings, and physical examinations, the MEB found the applicant was diagnosed as having the medically-unacceptable condition of Crohn's Disease. On 5 November 2004, an informal PEB convened and found the applicant's condition prevented him from performing the duties required of his grade and military specialty and determined he was physically unfit due to Crohn's disease...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011839

    Original file (20120011839.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * DA Form 199 (PEB Proceedings), dated 12 January 2005 * Letter from the VA – Maryland Health Care System * DA Form 3947 (MEB Proceedings) * Waiver of Rights to Election, dated 14 February 2005 * Letter from the U.S. Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA), dated 12 January 2005 * Letter from the PEBLO, dated 4 January 2005 * Walter Reed Army Medical Center (WRAMC) – Psychiatric TDRL Evaluation, dated 27 December 2004 * WRAMC Neurology Clinic – TDRL Examination,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005624

    Original file (20080005624.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application: Enlisted Record Brief (ERB); DD Form 214; Headquarters, United States Army Armor Center and Fort Knox, Orders 102-0163, dated 12 April 2002; United States Army Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Memorandum, dated 30 April 2003; and United States Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) Orders D109-3, dated 5 June 2003. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes Army policy and criteria concerning...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120014565

    Original file (20120014565.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) results for her Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) reevaluation be nullified and a new evaluation be performed. On 16 July 2009, the applicant was honorably retired from active duty, in pay grade E-5, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation) paragraph 4-24b(2), for temporary disability. A letter sent to the applicant at her Fayetteville, NC,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008962

    Original file (20090008962.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) that was issued on 2 June 2003 be changed to show that he was retired due to permanent physical disability and that item 18 (Remarks) of this document be corrected to show that he was awarded an 80-percent disability rating from the Army. He also states that the USAPDA told him that he had to make a request through the Army Board for...