Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016735
Original file (20110016735.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  28 February 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110016735


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests the amount of lost time be corrected on his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty).

2.  The applicant states he was absent without leave (AWOL) 3 days from 
17-20 December 1974.  His DD Form 214 shows he was AWOL 8 days from 
3-6 November 1974 and 17-20 December 1974.  He states he was not AWOL in November 1974.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  On 23 September 1974 at Newark, NJ, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army for 2 years.  He was assigned to Fort Dix, NJ for basic combat training (BCT).

3.  The applicant went AWOL on 3 November 1974 and returned to military control on 6 November 1974, a period of 3 days.  On 6 November 1974, he accepted nonjudicial punishment (NJP) under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice for this AWOL period.

4.  Following BCT, the applicant was transferred to Fort Gordon, GA for advanced individual training (AIT).  The applicant's AIT company commander notified him on 9 December 1974 that he was initiating action to discharge him under the Trainee Discharge Program (TDP) established by Department of the Army Message DAPE-MPE 011510Z August 1973.  The cited reasons were:

* he was a quitter
* he demonstrated hostility towards the Army
* he showed evidence of social/emotional maladjustment
* he demonstrated clearly substandard performance
* he displayed an inability to accept instructions or directions
* he would not cooperate with peers and superiors
* he had incidents of a discreditable nature
* he displayed apathy

5.  The applicant consulted with counsel and acknowledged notification on 9 December 1974.  On 16 December 1974, the approving authority approved the applicant's discharge.

6.  On 17 December 1974, the applicant went AWOL again and never returned to Fort Gordon.  He was discharged in absentia on 20 December 1974.  His 
DD Form 214 shows, in Item 21 (Time Lost), 8 days.  In Item 27 (Remarks), it shows two periods of AWOL, from 3 to 6 November 1974 and from 17 to 
20 December 1974.

7.  Army Regulation 630-10 (Absence Without Leave and Desertion) provides guidance for determining AWOL or desertion status.  It defines procedures for administration of persons in such status.  It gives instructions:  for starting apprehension efforts.  It also describes administrative actions for Soldiers returning to military control.  It states:

	a.  Soldiers will be reported AWOL when they absent themselves without authority and remain absent for more than 24 hours.

	b.  Absentees and deserters are considered returned to military control when they:

* surrender to military authorities
* are delivered to military authorities
* are arrested by or for military authorities
* are available for transfer to military custody after being held by civil authorities

	c.  Soldiers who are being processed for discharge under Army Regulation 635–200 may be separated without physically returning to military control when AWOL after receiving notice of separation processing.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant argues he was never AWOL in November 1974.  However, the record clearly shows he was AWOL on 3-5 November 1974 and returned to military control on 6 November 1974, at which time he was punished under Article 15, UCMJ.

2.  The applicant was processed for administrative discharge under the TDP.  During that process, he went AWOL on 17 December 1974 and remained absent through his discharge on 20 December 1974.

3.  The applicant's first period of AWOL was 3 days, not 4 days as stated on his DD Form 214.  His second period of AWOL was 4 days.  His DD Form 214 should be corrected to show in:

* Item 21 "7 days lost (See Item 27)"
* Item 27 "7 days lost under 10 USC 972 from 741103-741105; 741217-741220"

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

____X____  ___X_____  ___X_____  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be amended by correcting his DD Form 214 as follows in:

* Item 21 deleting the current entry and adding "7 days lost (See Item 27)"
* Item 27 deleting the current entry7 and adding "7 days lost under 10 USC 972 from 741103-741105; 741217-741220"

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to:

* completely deleting his lost time in November 1974
* changing his 4 days of lost time in December 1974 to 3 days of lost time



      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110016735



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110016735



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021773

    Original file (20100021773.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DD Form 47 (Record of Induction) shows he was in the custody of the law at the time he was inducted into the Army of United States. Paragraph 5-5b of the same regulation states that an individual claiming erroneous induction because of a procedural right as provided by the Military Selective Service Act of 1967 may submit a request for release from custody and control of the Army. The available evidence shows he was charged with a Selective Service violation on 15 June 1966, for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011655

    Original file (20110011655.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he was discharged for medical disability. The applicant provides no additional evidence. On 10 May 1974, the applicant’s immediate commander advised the applicant he intended to recommend him for discharge under the provisions of Department of the Army (DA) Message Date Time Group 011510Z, dated August 1973, Subject: Evaluation and Discharge of Enlistees Before 180 Active Duty Days, later incorporated into Army Regulation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008581

    Original file (20100008581.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This regulation further states when a member returned from an absence that is or appears to be unauthorized, the unit commander will informally investigate the case at once. A copy of the applicant's DA Form 20 shows the AWOL time during the period 25 September 1969 - 4 November 1969 was to be made good per the letter from the 257th Replacement Company, dated 11 April 1970. Therefore, this portion of his DD Form, 214 should be corrected to remove the erroneous period of AWOL and to show 40...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012322

    Original file (20060012322.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 15 May 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060012322 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant's last period of unauthorized absence was not excused even though he was allowed to separate with a Hardship Discharge. Yolanda Maldonado ______________________ CHAIRPERSON INDEX CASE...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009753

    Original file (20130009753.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests removal of the entry "129 days of time lost under Title 10, U.S. Code (USC), section 972" from his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty). Item 44 (Time Lost under Section 972, Title 10, USC, and Subsequent to Normal Date of Expiration of Term of Service (ETS)) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows the following: * AWOL – 31 October 1971-2 November 1971 – 3 days * AWOL – 4 September 1972-3 October 1971 – 30 days (lined through) * DFR – 4...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010417

    Original file (20100010417.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. On 25 November 1975, court-martial charges were preferred against the applicant for the above periods of AWOL. There is no record the applicant petitioned the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) seeking a discharge upgrade during that board's 15-year statute of limitations.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006056

    Original file (20110006056.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Standard Form (SF) 88 (Report of Medical Examination) prepared for his examination shows in item 5 (Purpose of Examination) the entry "Separation under AR [Army Regulation] 635-200 [Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel], chapter 13 [Separation for Unsuitability]." On 1 September 1981, the separation authority ordered the applicant's discharge in absentia and directed the applicant be issued an under other than honorable conditions discharge. c. Paragraph 3-7b states that a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021699

    Original file (20100021699.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction to Items 4a (Grade, Rate or Rank), 4b (Pay Grade), and 29 (Date of Time Lost During This Period) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 21 July 2010. He provides: * a DA Form 2173 (Statement of Medical Examination and Duty Status) * a DA Form 31 (Request and Authorization for Leave) * his civilian doctor's recommendation for extension of convalescent leave * a DA Form 4856 (Developmental Counseling...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070003357

    Original file (20070003357.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that the Army shows him as having 59 days of time lost for the period from 23 February through 22 April 1974. The applicant contends his DD Form 214 shows he has 59 days of time lost for the period from 23 February through 22 April 1974. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by a. correcting Item 26a, of the applicant's DD Form 214, to show he had only 57 days time lost, as opposed...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002678

    Original file (20090002678.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that item 21 (Time Lost) on his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) which shows 100 days of lost time should be removed from his record because his expiration of term of service (ETS) date was extended until 25 May 1980 [sic]. Section III of his Statement of Enlistment shows that he enlisted for 3 years of active duty service thereby establishing his ETS date as 14 Februaty 1977. Item 18a and c of his DD Form 214 shows he completed 3 years...