Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070003357
Original file (20070003357.txt) Auto-classification: Approved


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


	IN THE CASE OF:	  


	BOARD DATE:	 20 November 2007 
	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20070003357 


	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.


x

	The Board considered the following evidence:

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that the time lost recorded on his DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that the Army shows him as having 59 days of time lost for the period from 23 February through 22 April 1974.  He states he was not AWOL (absent without leave) until a later date.  His qualifying was in March and the Army has him missing in February.  He summarizes by stating he did go AWOL but not on the dates stated.

3.  In support of his request, the applicant provided a copy of his DD Form 214, with an effective date of his discharge of 6 May 1974.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's records show he enlisted in the Regular Army, for 3 years, on 28 November 1972, in the rank and pay grade, Private, E-1.  He completed basic combat training at Fort Knox, Kentucky, on 16 February 1973.  The applicant was honorably discharged on 6 March 1973, under the provisions of AR 635-200, for an unfulfilled enlistment contract.  At the time of his discharge, he had completed 3 months and 9 days net active service.

3. The applicant's records show he enlisted, in the Regular Army, for 3 years, in the rank and pay grade, Private, E-1, on 18 December 1973.  He completed advanced individual training at Fort Polk, Louisiana, and was awarded the military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman).

4.  On 23 February 1974, the applicant was reported AWOL.  At the time of the applicant's departure on AWOL, he was assigned to Company A, 2nd Battalion, 3rd Training Brigade, Fort Polk, Louisiana.

5.  A DA Form 188, Extract Copy of Morning Report, shows he was departed AWOL from Company A, 2nd Battalion, 3rd Training Brigade, at 0001 hours, 23 February 1974.  The same DA Form 188 shows the applicant was dropped from the rolls of his unit on 25 March 1974.

6.  A DA Form 3836, Notice of Return of US Army Member from Unauthorized Absence, dated 30 April 1974, shows the applicant returned from AWOL on 23 April 1974 at Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri.

7.  On 30 April 1974, the applicant received a summary court martial.  He was found guilty of absenting himself without authority for the period from 23 February 1974 to on or about 20 April 1974 [a total of 57 days].  He was sentenced to a forfeiture of $125.00 pay per month for one month, to be reduced to pay grade E-1, and to be restricted to the limits of his unit of assignment for 21 days.  The sentence was approved and ordered executed on the same date.

8.  The applicant was discharged with a general, under honorable conditions, discharge on 6 May 1974, under the provisions of Army Regulation (AR) 635-200, chapter 13, for unsuitability – character and behavior disorders, in the rank and pay grade of Private, E-1.  On 5 November 1987, the authority for the applicant's discharge was corrected to show he was discharged for unsuitability – apathy, defective attitudes and inability to expend effort constructively.

9.  The applicant's DD Form 214, in Item 22a (1) shows on the date he was discharged, he had completed 2 months and 19 days active military service, this enlistment, and 3 months and 9 days prior active service.  Item 22a (3) and Item 22b show the applicant had completed 5 months and 28 days total active service.

10.  Item 26a. (Non-pay Periods Time Lost), of the applicant's DD Form 214, shows the entry, "59 days."  Item 30 (Remarks), shows he was charged with 59 days lost time under Title 10 USC 972 for the period from 23 February through 22 April 1974.

11.  AR 635-5 prescribes the separation documents that must be prepared for Soldiers on retirement, discharge, release from active duty service, or control of the active Army.  It establishes standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  This regulation provides detailed instructions and source document(s) for completing each item of the DD Form 214.  In item 26a the instructions were to enter the inclusive dates of non-pay periods/time lost during the preceding 2 years.  Item 30 would be used to complete entries too long for their respective blocks and if the individual had lost time prior to normal ETS (expiration of term of service), as indicated in Section 6, DA Form 20, Enlisted Qualification Record, the total number of days lost, with inclusive dates, would be entered.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends his DD Form 214 shows he has 59 days of time lost for the period from 23 February through 22 April 1974.  He states he was not AWOL on these dates but went AWOL later.

2.  The evidence of record shows he departed AWOL from his unit at 0001 hours, 23 February 1974 and was dropped from the rolls of his unit on 25 March 1974.  He remained AWOL until he surrendered himself to military authorities on 23 April 1974.

3.  The applicant was convicted by a summary court martial on 30 April 1974; however, he was only convicted for an absence for the period from 23 February 1974 through 20 April 1974, an absence of only 57 days.

4.  Based on the evidence of record, the applicant is entitled to a correction of his record to show he had only 57 days time lost; and the period of this time lost spanned the period from 23 February 1974 through 20 April 1974.  There is no evidence to support the applicant's contention his absence was at a later period on time.

5.  Based on this correction, the applicant is entitled to credit for the two additional days and to have these days added to the totals shown in Item 22a (1) and 22b.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

___x ___  __x___  ___x__ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by 

	a.  correcting Item 26a, of the applicant's DD Form 214, to show he had only 57 days time lost, as opposed to the 59 days currently recorded; 

	b.  correcting Item 22a (1) to show the applicant had completed 2 months and 21 days active military service, this enlistment, and correcting Item 22b to show he had completed 6 months total active service; and

	c.  correcting the remark in Item 30 to show the entry, "57 days lost under 10 USC 972 from 23 February through 20 April 1974."

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to correcting the applicant's DD Form 214 to show he was AWOL at a later date than reflected on his DD Form 214.




_____x________
          CHAIRPERSON



INDEX

CASE ID
AR20070003357
SUFFIX

RECON

DATE BOARDED

TYPE OF DISCHARGE

DATE OF DISCHARGE

DISCHARGE AUTHORITY

DISCHARGE REASON

BOARD DECISION
PARTIAL GRANT
REVIEW AUTHORITY

ISSUES         1.
123.0000
2.
123.0100
3.

4.

5.

6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070001705

    Original file (20070001705.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 26 July 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070001705 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests, in effect, that item 26a (Non-Pay Periods Time Lost [Preceding Two years]), of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), which shows the entry "6APR71 –...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008581

    Original file (20100008581.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This regulation further states when a member returned from an absence that is or appears to be unauthorized, the unit commander will informally investigate the case at once. A copy of the applicant's DA Form 20 shows the AWOL time during the period 25 September 1969 - 4 November 1969 was to be made good per the letter from the 257th Replacement Company, dated 11 April 1970. Therefore, this portion of his DD Form, 214 should be corrected to remove the erroneous period of AWOL and to show 40...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028921

    Original file (20100028921.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. He was discharged on 5 October 1973 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial. _____________X____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029546

    Original file (20100029546.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    BOARD DATE: 28 June 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100029546 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show service credit for all of the time he spent on active duty. Item 22b (Total Active Service) - "0 years, 2 months, and 11 days" c. Item 26a (Non-Pay Periods Time Lost) the entries: * 14 May 1969 - 20 May 1969 * 26 May 1969 - 27 June 1969 * 30 July 1969...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018701

    Original file (20090018701.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests upgrade of his general under honorable conditions discharge to an honorable discharge. Accordingly, the applicant was discharged on 3 October 1967 with a general discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212 for unsuitability due to character and behavior disorder. Evidence of record shows the applicant's total service extended from 1 March 1966 to 3 October 1967 for a period of 1 year, 7 months, and 2 days.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004106456C070208

    Original file (2004106456C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Carol A. Kornhoff | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The evidence of record confirms the total period of active military service covered by the DD Form 214 in question is 2 years, 10 months and 15 days. The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013047

    Original file (20080013047.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to add all his medals and that his service dates be corrected at the same time. However, based on his service in Vietnam he is entitled to correction of Item 30 to show his inclusive period of service in Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from Items...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003181

    Original file (20110003181.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-5, in effect at the time, prescribes the separation documents that must be prepared for Soldiers on retirement, discharge, release from active duty service, or control of the Active Army. It states for: * Item 11d, enter the date separation is accomplished * Item 22a(1), enter the total service completed between date inducted and separation date of the DD Form 214, less time lost under Title 10, U.S. Code, section 972 * Item 22a(2), enter all prior service excluding any...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004487

    Original file (20140004487.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests removal of the lost time from item 26a (Non-Pay Periods Time Lost) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). His DD Form 214 shows in: * item 10c (Date Inducted) - 23 September 1969 * item 11d (Effective Date (of Separation)) - 17 September 1971 * item 22a (1) (Net Service This Period) - 1-11-25 * item 22b (Total Active Service) - 1-11-25 * item 26a - 17 to 30 October 1970 * item 26b (Days Accrued Leave Paid) - -14 days 6....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016828

    Original file (20080016828.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that items 22a(1) (Net Service This Period) and 22a(3) (Total) on his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected. However, item 22 on his DD Form 214 shows he only served 2 years, 7 months, and 21 days. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Evidence of record shows the applicant's total service extended from 2 November 1967 to 21 June 1972 for a period of 4 years, 7 months, and 21 days.