Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016069
Original file (20110016069.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  7 August 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110016069 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his military records by showing that his contract was honored and that a control number had been obtained for his Chaplain Loan Repayment Program Addendum (CHLRP).  He further requests payment that was due on 24 November 2010.

2.  The applicant states he completed all of the documentation with the recruiter on the day he was sworn in as a chaplain.  He and the recruiter walked to the incentives office where the personnel there assisted him with signing the written CHLRP agreement and initialing as required.  He was provided a copy and the incentives office kept a copy.  He was unaware about the control number at the bottom of the agreement and did not know to request this number before leaving the office.  He did everything in good faith but the incentives office failed to fulfill their responsibilities.

3.  The applicant provides copies of:

* Orders 328-244, Joint Force Headquarters, dated 24 November 2009
* Orders 334-044, Joint Force Headquarters, dated 30 November 2009
* Written Agreement, CHLRP, initialed and signed, but undated
* Request for exception to policy for the CHLRP, dated 23 February 2011
* Request for Exception to Policy for Student Loan Repayment, dated 
1 March 2011
* Request for Exception to Policy for Manual Control Number of CHLRP, dated 31 May 2011
* Memorandum for Missouri Army National Guard, Exception to Policy for CHLRP Manual Control Number, dated 2 June 2011
* Memorandum for Record, Recruiting and Retention Specialist, dated      21 July 2011

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  At the time of his application, the applicant was serving as a captain, pay grade O-3, Chaplain branch, in the Missouri Army National Guard (MOARNG).

2.  Effective 24 November 2009, the applicant was appointed as a Chaplain and assigned for duty with the MOARNG.  In conjunction with this appointment, he initialed and signed a CHLRP.  He acknowledged in this agreement that his eligibility under this program would terminate if he accepted a military technician position in a Reserve unit.

3.  On 23 February 2011, the applicant requested an exception to policy in regard to his CHLRP.  In his request he stated that it was November 2010 when he found out about the problem with the control number not being entered on his contract.  He also stated that the matter was further complicated because he had been hired as a military technician.  His chain of command recommended approval of his request for an exception to policy, but in June 2011 the Chief, Education, Incentives and Employment Division, National Guard Bureau (NGB), determined that his request could not be approved because it was received too late.

4.  In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the Chief, Personnel Policy Division, NGB.  The opinion states that the manual control number had been approved; but, because he had accepted a military technician position within a year of the CHLRP he was rendered ineligible to receive payment as defined in his agreement.

5.  On 20 June 2012, a copy of the advisory opinion was sent to the applicant for his information and opportunity to respond.  No response has been received.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his military records should be corrected to show that his contract was honored and that a control number had been obtained for his CHLRP, and that he be paid as was due on 24 November 2010.

2.  The available evidence clearly shows that the applicant accepted a military technician position which made him ineligible to receive the CHLRP as agreed to in his contract.

3.  There is no error or injustice in this case.  Therefore, the applicant's request should be denied.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ____x___  ___x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   __x_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110016069





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110016069



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012087

    Original file (20130012087.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He signed an Written Agreement – OAB Addendum on 28 August 2008 wherein he agreed to accept an appointment as an officer in the Armed Forces to serve in the Selected Reserve (SELRES) for 6 years, the full period of this agreement, in a critical officer skill designated for bonus entitlement by the Chief of the Army National Guard in exchange for payment of an accession bonus in the amount of $10,000.00 to be paid upon successful completion of the officer basic course (OBC) or, if not...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014091

    Original file (20140014091.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The National Guard Bureau (NGB) denied his request for an ETP to retain his eligibility for the ELRP incentive because: * he contracted for the incentive while in a Military Technician (MilTech) status (Federal or State civilian) * accepting the ELRP incentive while a MilTech violates Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 1205.21 (Reserve Component Incentive Programs Procedures) b. A statement, dated 30 July 2014, from the applicant's Retention NCO, which essentially states: * in August...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022418

    Original file (20110022418.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states Annex L (Enlisted Loan Repayment Program Addendum - Army National Guard (ARNG) of the United States) of his enlistment contract omitted a bonus control number (BCN) for the SLRP. The applicant provides copies of: * A self-authored DA Form 2823 (Sworn Statement) * Email exchanged with the National Guard Bureau (NGB) * His promissory notes * Annex L * Enlistment/Reenlistment Agreement - ARNG - Service Requirements and Method of Fulfillment * DD Form 4...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011041

    Original file (20110011041.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 600-7-5-R-E (Enlisted Loan Repayment Program Addendum, Army National Guard of the United States) be corrected to show he was assigned a manual control number for the Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP). As a result, the applicant was not properly issued a student loan repayment control number on the date of enlistment (i.e., 30 June 2010). As a result, the Board recommends that all State Army National Guard and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021503

    Original file (20140021503.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Terminating his SLRP incentive because of an error on the part of the State SLRP manager nearly 3 years after he was granted this incentive would be an injustice to him and his family. The applicant provides copies of the following: * Orders Number 223-008 * two SF 50 * DA Form 4836 (Oath of Extension of Enlistment or Reenlistment) * Annex L (SLRP Addendum, ARNG) * Email from the Missouri ARNG (MOARNG) SLRP Manager * Request for ETP for SLRP memorandum CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. A...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001892

    Original file (20150001892.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He confirmed that he entered the CLRP on 8 April 2010, the request was approved and documentation executed, and the applicant entered the AGR program on 18 July 2010 when Soldiers could retain their incentive as an AGR or Mil-Tech. There is no evidence of record of any other anniversary payments. The evidence of record shows the applicant accepted an AGR position with a 3-year active duty commitment beginning 18 July 2010 and he performed the duties of Officer Strength Manager – Recruiter...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001311

    Original file (20110001311.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests he be issued a manual bonus control number to be eligible to receive the first installment of his Officer Accession Bonus (OAB) in the amount of $10,000.00 in accordance with the terms of his enlistment in an authorized critical skill with the Missouri Army National Guard (MOARNG). The applicant provides: * MOARNG memorandum to the ABCMR, dated 5 January 2011 * DA Form 2823 (Sworn Statement) from Ms. Dxxxx x. Bxxxx * NGB memorandum reference Request for ETP, dated 9...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009609

    Original file (20140009609.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states two issues have put the CLRP Addendum he signed in jeopardy: * his bonus addendum is signed but not dated by all concerned * he transferred from the New Hampshire Army National Guard (NHARNG) to the Maine Army National Guard (MEARNG) 2 years into his 3-year incentive bonus contract with the NHARNG 3. However, no one dated the addendum. c. The applicant moved from the NHARNG to the MEARNG approximately 2 years into his 3-year incentive contract.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002058

    Original file (20140002058.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 7 August 2011, he served his first 3-year obligation as a chaplain in the ARNG. e. The applicant also received a $10,000.00 OAB. The CLRP and OAB payments he received were both for the same contractual period and the law clearly states a service member is not eligible to receive the CLRP and OAB simultaneously.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007955

    Original file (20140007955.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he is eligible for the Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP) incentive. He has documentation showing he was told by a State (representative) that he would receive payments under the SLRP. He was then told he could not receive the SLRP incentive because he was an officer.