Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016034
Original file (20110016034.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

	

		BOARD DATE:	 13 March 2012 

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110016034 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his records to show his service in Vietnam. 

2.  The applicant states he needs his records corrected to show he served in Vietnam from 1969 through 1970 in order to obtain benefits.

3.  The applicant provides a letter of support from a fellow Soldier.  He also provides four letters of appreciation that belong to the fellow Soldier.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted on 20 June 1969.  He completed the training requirements and he was awarded military occupation specialty 94A (Food Services Specialist).

3.  He received nonjudicial punishment under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice while assigned to the:

	a.  2nd Training Brigade, Fort Campbell, KY on 3 October 1969 and 9 February 1970; and 

	b.  2nd Battalion, 33rd Artillery Regiment, Augsburg, Germany, on 20 August 1970.

4.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he was assigned to: 

	a.  Fort Campbell, KY, for training from 30 June 1969 through 7 April 1970; 

	b.  2nd Battalion, 33rd Artillery Regiment in Germany, from 18 May 1970 through 26 July 1971; and
 
	c.  in pretrial confinement in Germany from 3 April to 18 May 1971.

5.  The applicant was released from active duty on 28 July 1971.  His DD Form 214 shows 1 year, 11 months, and 25 days of creditable service with 45 days of lost time.  Item 22c (Foreign Service) shows 1 year and 27 days of service in USAREUR (U.S. Army Europe).

6.  The applicant's official military personnel file contains no evidence that he served in Vietnam at any time.

7.  The letter of support from a fellow Soldier, with the supporting documents, states the Soldier served in Vietnam from 1968 through 1970.  He had known the applicant prior to service and recalls being surprised to have met-up with him in Vietnam.  The fellow Soldier states he and the applicant went on Rest and Recreation together in Saigon and met-up again during an Alcoholics Anonymous meeting in 1992.  

8.  Army Regulation 15–185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records) prescribes the policies and procedures for correction of military records by the Secretary of the Army, acting through the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR).  Paragraph 2-9 states that the ABCMR begins its consideration of each case with the presumption of administrative regularity.  The applicant has the burden of proving an error or injustice by a preponderance of the evidence.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's record of NJPs show he served in either Kentucky or Germany in 1969 and 1970. 

2.  There are no periods of service unaccounted for and no official documentation that would put the applicant in Vietnam at anytime.  

3.  The statement of support from a fellow Soldier is insufficient to warrant correction of the applicant's records to show he served in Vietnam.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X__  ____X____  __X______  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _  X _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110016034



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110016034



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011227

    Original file (20140011227.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    All units assigned in Vietnam from 8 February 1962 through 28 March 1973 were awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, based on Department of the Army General Order Number 8, dated 1974. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), then in effect, provided that the Purple Heart was awarded to any member of an Armed Force or any civilian national of the United States who, while serving under competent authority in any capacity with one of the U.S. armed services...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027400

    Original file (20100027400.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his military records to show award of the Vietnam Service Medal and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960). There is no evidence in his military records that shows the applicant served in the RVN or provided direct support to the RVN 6. This medal was awarded by the Government of the RVN to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in the RVN during the period 1 March 1961 through 28 March 1973.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070001235

    Original file (20070001235.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military service records contain a DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), with an effective date of 25 April 1973. There are no orders in the applicant’s military service records which show that he was awarded the Purple Heart. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned by: a. correcting his DD Form 214, with an effective date of 25 April 1973, by: (1)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001622

    Original file (20110001622.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests his Undesirable Discharge (UD) be upgraded to an under honorable conditions (General) discharge (GD). On 27 April 1972, the approving authority accepted the applicant's request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10. There is no evidence the applicant's service in Vietnam was the cause of his misconduct and ultimate discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018134

    Original file (20100018134.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show award of the Bronze Star Medal. A citation for award of the Bronze Star Medal for meritorious service in connection with military operations against a hostile force in the Republic of Vietnam from August 1970 to June 1971. c. An undated DA Form 2406 from the S-1, 326th Engineer Battalion, instructing...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001626C070206

    Original file (20050001626C070206.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Good Conduct Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal with two or three bronze service stars, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation, the Presidential Unit Citation, the Valorous Unit Award, the Meritorious Unit Commendation, and the Purple Heart. This document shows the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001626C070206

    Original file (20050001626C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Good Conduct Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal with two or three bronze service stars, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation, the Presidential Unit Citation, the Valorous Unit Award, the Meritorious Unit Commendation, and the Purple Heart. This document shows the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012459

    Original file (20080012459.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This medal was awarded by the Government of the Republic of Vietnam to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Republic of Vietnam during the period 1 March 1961 through 28 March 1973. This regulation further provides that individuals who served less than 6 months and were wounded by hostile forces are entitled to award of the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960). The applicant's military personnel record shows he participated in one...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2005 | 20050008650

    Original file (20050008650.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his record be corrected to show he served in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) from March through September 1970. In view of the facts of this case, absent any evidence to corroborate the applicant’s claim that he was TDY in the RVN from March through September 1970, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis to support granting the requested relief. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018715

    Original file (20140018715.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940 and for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years, but more than 1 year. There is no available evidence showing he is authorized any awards for his period of service in Germany. As a result, the Board recommends that all...