Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2005 | 20050008650
Original file (20050008650.doc) Auto-classification: Denied



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:           14 February 2006
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20050008650


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Mr. Joseph A. Adriance            |     |Analyst              |

      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Ms. Jennifer L. Prater            |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. Dale E. DeBruler              |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. Robert W. Soniak              |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his record be corrected to show
he served in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) from March through September
1970.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that while he was assigned to Germany,
he went on temporary duty (TDY) to the RVN from March through September
1970.  He claims to have been diagnosed with a Post Traumatic Stress
Disorder (PTSD) and is requesting his military records be corrected to show
the correct locations of his assignments.

3.  The applicant provides a Statement in Support of Claim (VA Form 21-
4138) in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error or injustice
that occurred on 3 March 1971.  The application submitted in this case was
received on 8 June 2005.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army
Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file
within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will
conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  The applicant’s record shows that he was inducted into the Army and
entered active duty on 10 March 1969.  He was trained in, awarded and
served in military occupational specialty (MOS) 16B (Hercules Missile
Crewman), and the highest rank he attained while serving on active duty was
specialist four (SP4).

4.  The applicant’s Enlisted Qualification Record (DA Form 20) shows, in
Item 31 (Foreign Service), that he served overseas in Germany from 14
August 1969 through 28 February 1971.  Item 38 (Record of Assignments)
shows that during his tour in Germany, he was assigned to Battery C, 4th
Battalion, 6th Artillery from 18 August through 10 December 1969, and to
Battery D, 2nd Battalion, 56th Artillery from 11 December 1969 through 28
February 1971.

5.  Item 31 of the applicant’s DA Form 20 contains no entry related to RVN
service, and Item 38 has no record of assignment to any RVN unit.  Further,
there is no indication in Item 42 (Remarks) that indicates he was ever on
TDY in the RVN.

6.  The applicant’s Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) is void of any
orders, or other documents indicating the applicant ever served in the RVN
in any status.

7.  The applicant’s MPRJ contains a copy of Headquarters, 2nd Battalion,
56th Artillery Letter Orders Number 5-18, dated 11 May 1970, which
authorized the applicant a four day administrative absence to Garmish,
Germany and Austria beginning on 15 May 1970.  It also contains a promotion
packet that contains a Promotion Board President memorandum, dated 21 July
1970, which confirms the applicant appeared before the battalion promotion
board in Germany on
21 July 1970.

8.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation
documents that must be prepared for Soldiers on retirement, discharge,
release from active duty service, or control of the Active Army.  It also
establishes standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form
214.  The regulation in effect at the time of the applicant’s separation
required an entry in Item 30 (Remarks) documenting Vietnam service for
those members who served there.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s claim that he served in the RVN in a TDY status from
March through September 1970 was carefully considered.  However, there is
insufficient evidence to support this claim.

2.  The evidence of record confirms the applicant served overseas in
Germany from 14 August 1969 through 28 February 1971.  It also confirms
that on 15 May 1970, the applicant was authorized a four day administrative
absence to go to Garmish, Germany and Austria, and that he appeared before
a battalion promotion board in Germany on 21 July 1970.

3.  In view of the facts of this case, absent any evidence to corroborate
the applicant’s claim that he was TDY in the RVN from March through
September 1970, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis to support
granting the requested relief.

4.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must
show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily
appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to
submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

5.  Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or
injustice now under consideration on 2 March 1971, the date of his
separation.  Therefore, the time for him to file a request for correction
of any error or injustice expired on 1 March 1974.  However, he failed to
file within the 3-year statute of limitations and has not provided a
compelling explanation or evidence to show that it would be in the interest
of justice to excuse failure to timely file in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___JLP__  __DED__  ___RWS_  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate
the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board
determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis
for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence
provided which shows that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse
the applicant's failure to timely file this application within the 3-year
statute of limitations prescribed by law.  Therefore, there is insufficient
basis to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing or for
correction of the records of the individual concerned.




            ____Jennifer L. Prater____
                    CHAIRPERSON


                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20050008650                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |                                        |
|DATE BOARDED            |2006/02/14                              |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |HD                                      |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |1971/03/03                              |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |AR 635-200                              |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |OS Rtn                                  |
|BOARD DECISION          |DENY                                    |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |Mr. Chun                                |
|ISSUES         1.       |113.0000                                |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017684

    Original file (20110017684.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in the RVN from 6 March 1970 through 10 May 1971. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the AGCM for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 3 October 1969 through 10 May 1971, and to add this award to his record and DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Purple Heart for being wounded...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010977C071029

    Original file (20060010977C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The DD Form 214 he was issued at this time shows he earned the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM) in Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) and Item 25 (Education and Training Completed) contains the entry "NA." The evidence of record confirms that the only education and training recorded on the applicant's DA Form 20 that is not documented on a DD Form 214 issued to the applicant was the El Paso Community College...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029601

    Original file (20100029601.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) with 1st Oak Leaf Cluster and Purple Heart (PH) be added to his record and DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he completed two tours of duty in the RVN. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting the VSM from item 24 of his DD Form 214; and b....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002081801C070215

    Original file (2002081801C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record contains no indication that the applicant was ever recommended for or awarded the BSM. During its review of this case, the Board discovered that the applicant is entitled to awards that were not included in either his record or his separation document. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding the individual concerned the Army Good Conduct Medal, for his honorable period of qualifying service from 25 November 1969...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011096C071029

    Original file (20060011096C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that his record and separation document (DD Form 214) does not show his training as a door gunner and crew chief, and does not include the Gallantry Cross with Bronze Star. The applicant's MPRJ is void of any documents or orders indicating that he was formally trained in, awarded, or served in an MOS other than 36K while serving in the RVN, or at any other time while he was on active duty, or that confirms his service as a door gunner and/or crew chief. As...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040002367C070208

    Original file (20040002367C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    It states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each RVN campaign a member is credited with participating in while serving in the RVN. The evidence of record confirms the applicant was awarded the PH in Headquarters, 1st Cavalry Division GO Number 4750, dated 30 March 1970. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the first award of the Army Good Conduct...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023627

    Original file (20100023627.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    It also contains separation orders issued by the United States Army Personnel Center, Fort Lewis, Washington on 30 June 1971 that lists his MOS as 71F in the standard name line. The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time shows he held MOS 71F on the date of separation. Given the applicant was properly awarded and held PMOS 71F on the date of his REFRAD it would not be appropriate to revoke this MOS or delete all references to it from the record and DD Form 214 as requested by the applicant.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040000378C070208

    Original file (20040000378C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application: DD Form 214, Two Air Medal (AM) Citations, Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) Orders, Two Heroism Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) Orders, Bronze Star Medal (BSM) Orders, DA Form 1577 (Authorization for Issuance of Awards), and Separation Document Correction (DD Form 215). Although the applicant has provided two AM Citations, the evidence of record corroborates only one award of the AM, as evidenced by the entry...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009964

    Original file (20120009964.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he was wounded in action in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) and did not receive the PH. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the AGCM for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 13 June 1968 through 14 January 1970 and to add this award to his record and DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the Purple Heart for being wounded in action...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2005 | 20050010226

    Original file (20050010226.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 9 February 2006 DOCKET NUMBER: AR2005010226 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice now under consideration regarding his rank and pay grade on 10 February 1971, the date of his separation. Therefore, it requests...