Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015900
Original file (20110015900.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  2 February 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110015900 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his military records to show award of the Purple Heart for a wound received in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN).

2.  The applicant states he was wounded on 1 March 1967 and was treated at a field hospital and was returned to duty.  He subsequently returned to the RVN for a second tour of duty.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), a newspaper clipping, and a personal data list.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  On 16 August 1965, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army.  He completed his initial training and was awarded military occupational specialty 11C (Infantryman Indirect Fire Crewman).

3.  On 6 April 1966, the applicant departed Fort Dix, New Jersey for duty in the RVN.

	a  On 8 April 1966, he was assigned for duty with Company B, 1st Battalion, 14th Infantry Regiment.

	b.  On 12 February 1967, he was assigned for duty as a forward observer with Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 1st Battalion, 14th Infantry Regiment.

	c.  On 3 April 1967, he departed the RVN for duty with Company E, 1st Battalion, 20th Infantry Regiment, located at Fort Hood Texas.

	d.  On 5 December 1967, the applicant went back to the RVN with the 20th Infantry Regiment.

	e.  On 2 August 1968, the applicant returned to the U.S.

4.  On 5 August 1968, the applicant was released from active duty.  He had attained the rank of specialist four, pay grade E-4 and had completed 2 years, 
11 months and 20 days of creditable active duty.

5.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant's DD Form 214 lists his awards as:

* National Defense Service Medal
* Vietnam Service Medal
* RVN Vietnam Campaign Medal

6.  The applicant’s name is not listed on the Vietnam Casualty Roster.
	
7.  Item 40 (Wounds) of the applicant’s DA Form 20 (Record Enlisted Qualification) is blank.

8.  The applicant's service medical records are not available for review.

9.  The newspaper clipping [no date indicated] provided by the applicant reports that he had served in the RVN for a year and had been wounded on 1 March [no year given].  It also stated that he had been awarded the Purple Heart.

10.  The personal data information provided by the applicant does not indicate the source of the data but shows he suffered a surgical wound infection and had been awarded a Purple Heart which was never received.

11.  A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer Assisted Retrieval System (ADCARS), failed to reveal any orders awarding the applicant the Purple Heart.  ADCARS is an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the United States Army Human Resources Command.

12.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides for award of the Purple Heart to a member of the Armed Force or any civilian national of the United States who, while serving in any capacity with one of the U.S. Armed Services after 5 April 1917, has been wounded or killed, or who has died or may die after being wounded in any action against an enemy of the U.S.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his military records should be corrected to show award of the Purple Heart for a wound received in the RVN.

2.  There are no available general orders showing the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart.  The applicant's name is not listed on the Vietnam Casualty Roster. Item 40 of his DA Form 20 does not show a record of any wounds received in action.

3.  The evidence provided by the applicant clearly states he was wounded and had received the Purple Heart; however, there is no evidence of record that sufficiently corroborates his claim.

4.  In view of the above, the applicant's request should be denied.





BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ____x___  ___x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   __x_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110015900





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110015900



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019140

    Original file (20090019140.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's service medical records are not available. A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer Assisted Retrieval System (ADCARS) maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the United States Army Human Resources Command (HRC), which is an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 failed to reveal any award of the Army Commendation Medal with "V' Device, Purple Heart, or Combat Infantryman Badge orders on file for the applicant. During his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010196

    Original file (20110010196.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This pamphlet shows the 23rd Administration Company was cited in Department of the Army General Orders (DAGO) Number 53, dated 1970, for award of the Meritorious Unit Commendation during the time of the applicant's assignment. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to enlisted Soldiers who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080002312

    Original file (20080002312.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This award is not shown on the applicant's DD Form 214 and a copy of this general order was not on file in his service personnel record. No evidence was found either in his service personnel record or in the ADCARS data base to support addition of the Army Commendation Medal to the applicant's DD Form 214. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned by: a. adding the already-awarded second Purple Heart, in effect,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007292

    Original file (20120007292.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Purple Heart. The applicant states he was not awarded the Purple Heart because, at the time he was wounded, his commander was killed in action. However, it offers insufficient evidence to support award of the Purple Heart.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070008364C071108

    Original file (20070008364C071108.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Section 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant’s DD Form 214 does not show award of the Purple Heart. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief and to excuse failure to timely file. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing award of the Purple Heart for wounds...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004480

    Original file (20140004480.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence indicates he was wounded on 18 September 1967. The evidence of record shows only one entry on his DA Form 20 for a gunshot wound to the left ankle on 20 September 1967, but the evidence indicates that this date should be 18 September 1967. Although his record verifies he was a patient in the hospital on 15 November 1967 and transferred to Medical Holding Detachment, Fort Campbell, KY on 8 December 1967, there are no available medical records and the applicant did not provide...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011763

    Original file (20110011763.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests the Bronze Star Medal, Purple Heart, and the Combat Infantryman Badge be added to his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge). 101st Airborne Division General Orders Number 7078 of 10 October 1968 awarded the applicant the Bronze Star Medal for meritorious achievement in ground operations against a hostile force for the period August 1967 to August 1968. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120017900

    Original file (20120017900.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A review of the applicant's military personnel records failed to show he was awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award). Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010411

    Original file (20120010411.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Appendix B shows that during his service in Vietnam, the applicant participated in the following three campaigns: * Vietnam Defense Campaign (8 March - 24 December 1965) * Vietnam Counteroffensive (25 December 1965 - 30 June 1966) * Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase II (1 July 1966 - 31 May 1967) c. Paragraph 6-3 states an oak leaf cluster is awarded to denote the second and succeeding awards of certain decorations, among which is the PH. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110025063

    Original file (20110025063.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart and the Combat Infantryman Badge for his service in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN). The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show award of the Purple Heart and the Combat Infantryman Badge for his service in the RVN. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...