Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007292
Original file (20120007292.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	   

		BOARD DATE:	  15 November 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120007292 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states he was not awarded the Purple Heart because, at the time he was wounded, his commander was killed in action.

   a.  He states he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal for heroism on
8 November 1968.  While engaged in a firefight, he took command of an assault vehicle when his commander was wounded by a rocket propelled grenade (RPG).  He moved to secure the landing zone (LZ) to remove the wounded and he was slightly wounded in his left arm and shoulder by an RPG.

   b.  During a night attack while he was on guard duty at LZ Nancy in February 1969, he was wounded in the neck by shrapnel from an RPG or mortar round that struck the bunker that he was defending.

   c.  While on a counter-attack sweep near the Laos-Cambodia borders in 1969, his tank ran over a command detonated bomb.  The explosion caused the .50 caliber machine gun to strike him in the chin, knocking out several teeth.  He was treated at Quang Tri Medical Facility and later at Fort Riley, Kansas.

3.  The applicant provides his Bronze Star Medal orders and three photographs, including one from a newspaper clipping.


CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 14 August 1967 for a period of 3 years.  He was awarded military occupational specialty 11D (Armor Intelligence Specialist).

3.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in:

a. item 31 (Foreign Service):  Vietnam - 9 September 1968 through
31 August 1969;

	b.  item 38 (Record of Assignments):

* B Troop, 1st Squadron, 11th Armored Cavalry Regiment, from
12 September 1968 through 25 January 1969
* A Troop, 4th Squadron, 12th Cavalry, 1st Brigade, 5th Infantry Division (Mechanized), from 26 January through 26 August 1969

	c.  item 40 (Wounds):  no entry (is blank); and

	d.  item 41 (Awards and Decorations):  no listing of the Purple Heart.

4.  A DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) shows the applicant was honorably released from active duty on
13 August 1970 and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Reinforcement) to complete his Reserve obligation.  

   a.  He completed 3 years of net active service this period.

	b.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) does not show the Purple Heart.
5.  In support of his request, the applicant provides the following documents:

   a.  Headquarters, II Field Force Vietnam, General Orders Number 202, dated 26 January 1969, that shows the applicant was awarded the Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device for heroism against a hostile force on 8 November 1968 in the Republic of Vietnam.  The narrative describes the applicant's heroism; however, it does not mention that he was wounded during the action.

   b.  Headquarters, XXIV Corps, General Orders Number 1130, dated 28 July 1969, and an award citation that shows the applicant was awarded the Bronze Star Medal for meritorious service in the Republic of Vietnam from September 1968 to September 1969.  The citation does not show he was wounded during this period of service.
   
   c.  A photograph from a newspaper, dated 20 January 1969, shows the applicant was awarded the Bronze Star Medal for his actions in an engagement in which the 11 Armored Cavalry Regiment was credited with killing 155 North Vietnamese regulars.  The caption states, in part, "He was slightly wounded in the arm and shoulder."
   
   d.  Two photographs presumably of the applicant while he was serving in the Republic of Vietnam.

6.  A review of the applicant's military personnel records failed to reveal any evidence he was awarded the Purple Heart.

7.  The Vietnam casualty listing does not show the applicant's name.

8.  A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System (ADCARS), an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam-era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal any orders for the Purple Heart pertaining to the applicant.

9.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides policy, criteria, and administrative instructions concerning military awards and decorations.  It shows the Purple Heart is awarded to any member who was wounded or killed in action or as a result of enemy action.

   a.  A wound is defined as an injury to any part of the body from an outside force, element, or agent sustained in action in the face of the armed enemy or as a result of a hostile act of such enemy.

   b.  In order to support awarding a member the Purple Heart, it is necessary to establish the wound for which the award is being made required treatment by medical personnel and the medical treatment for the wound or injury received in action must have been made a matter of official record.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's claim to the Purple Heart was carefully considered.
	
   a.  The caption for the photograph in the newspaper clipping provided by the applicant stated the applicant was "slightly wounded in the arm and shoulder" on 8 November 1968.  However, it offers insufficient evidence to support award of the Purple Heart.

   b.  There is no evidence in the applicant's military personnel records that shows he was wounded or injured in action as a result of a hostile act of the enemy.

   c.  There is no record of medical treatment to satisfy the strict requirement for award of the Purple Heart.

	d.  The applicant's name is not listed on the Vietnam casualty listing and there is no evidence the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart.
   
2.  The sincerity of the applicant's claim is not in question.  However, in order to support awarding a member the Purple Heart, it is necessary to establish that the individual was wounded or injured in action or as a result of enemy action, the wound required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.  The evidence of record does not satisfy the criteria for award of the Purple Heart.

3.  In view of all of the foregoing, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis to support the applicant's claim to the Purple Heart.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ____x___  ____x___  DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   __x_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120007292



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120007292



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009265

    Original file (20100009265.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Bronze Star Medal, Army Good Conduct Medal, promotion consideration to a higher rank, and the records of the 7th Infantry Regiment, 3rd Infantry Division awards ceremony that occurred on the 153rd anniversary of the regiment. In the letter, the commander stated the applicant had indicated he received the Bronze Star Medal while stationed in the Republic of Korea on 30 January 1951. In support of his application, the applicant provided the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074996C070403

    Original file (2002074996C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015655

    Original file (20100015655.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, the daughter of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests the FSM's record be corrected to show award of the Purple Heart. The applicant provides the following documentary evidence on behalf of her deceased father: a. FSM's death certificate; b. WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation-Honorable Discharge) for the period ending 29 December 1945; c. WD AGO Form 100 (Separation Qualification Record); d. FSM's honorable discharge certificate; e. Western...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075078C070403

    Original file (2002075078C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. In support of his request, the applicant submits a newspaper clipping which reports that the applicant was wounded in action on 6 June 1968. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show:

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002864

    Original file (20090002864.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence in the available records which show that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. In the absence of orders or other evidence of record showing that the applicant was injured or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action in Vietnam, the statements provided by the applicant are not sufficient as a basis for award of the Purple Heart. Even the applicant's former first sergeant only stated that the applicant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010461

    Original file (20100010461.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A review of hospital admission data in the SGO files did not reveal any records indicating the FSM received a shrapnel wound to his knee or that he was otherwise wounded as a result of enemy action. The newspaper clipping shows the FSM was entitled to wear the insignia for the Meritorious Service Unit Plaque (later renamed the Meritorious Unit Commendation (MUC)) and was awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal, Purple Heart, Combat Infantryman Badge, and five battle stars. The applicant's...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010196

    Original file (20110010196.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This pamphlet shows the 23rd Administration Company was cited in Department of the Army General Orders (DAGO) Number 53, dated 1970, for award of the Meritorious Unit Commendation during the time of the applicant's assignment. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to enlisted Soldiers who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005738

    Original file (20080005738.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's DD Form 214 shows entitlement to the Vietnam Service Medal; however, it does not show the bronze service stars to which he is entitled for his campaign participation. There is no evidence in the applicant's service record to show he was awarded the Purple Heart while he served in Vietnam and the applicant provided none, other than a series of four photographs in which he is wearing a patch over his right eye. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060000309C070205

    Original file (20060000309C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 8 August 2006 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060000309 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the award of the Army Good Conduct...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014869

    Original file (20080014869.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. The applicant's DA Form 20 provides the following pertinent information: a. his official MOS was 91B (Medical Specialist); b. he was assigned to...