Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000787
Original file (20150000787.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  3 September 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20150000787 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he was placed on the Retired List in the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5.

2.  The applicant states he was never promoted beyond the rank/grade of specialist (SPC)/E-4.  He was repeatedly passed over for Noncommissioned Officer Education System (NCOES) schools.

3.  The applicant provides two DD Forms 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record), three orders, three diplomas, two college transcripts, and three letters.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was born on 1 November 1954.  He was awarded an Associate's Degree in Parks Management from Kirkwood Community College, Cedar Rapids, IA, in 1979.

3.  He enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) on 29 April 1980 and he held military occupational specialty (MOS) 17C (Field Artillery Target Acquisition Specialist).  On 29 October 1980, he was promoted to the rank of SPC.  On 28 April 1983, he was honorably released from active duty in the rank of SPC and he was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR).

4.  On 12 July 1983, he enlisted in the RA and served in MOS 17C.  His DA Form 2-1 shows he was promoted to the rank of SPC on 1 September 1984.  On 11 July 1986, he was honorably discharged from the RA in the rank of SPC.

5.  He provides a transcript from The University of the State of New York that shows he was awarded a Bachelor of Science Degree in Liberal Arts on 22 May 1987.

6.  In December 1987, he enlisted in the Oregon Army National Guard (ORARNG).  He was assigned to the 2nd Battalion, 218th Field Artillery (FA) Regiment, Hood River, OR, in MOS 93F (FA Meteorological Crewmember).  In December 1995, he requested a conditional release from the ORARNG to enlist in the USAR in IA.  On 15 January 1996, he was honorably discharged from the ORARNG in the rank of SPC. 

7.  On 16 January 1996, he enlisted in the USAR in the rank of SPC for a period of 6 years.  He was assigned to the 872nd Maintenance Company, Washington, IA, in MOS 92A (Automated Logistics Specialist).  On 18 September 1996, he transferred to the 308th Quartermaster Company, Washington, IA.  On 4 March 1999, he was awarded primary MOS 52D (Power Generator Equipment Repairer).  On 8 December 2002, he reenlisted in the USAR in the rank of SPC for a period of 3 years.

8.  The applicant provides Orders 04-121-0001, dated 30 April 2004, issued by Headquarters, 89th Regional Readiness Command, releasing him from his current assignment in the rank of SPC by reason of being medically disqualified and transferring him to the Retired Reserve.  

9.  He provides Orders C11-498913, dated 4 November 2014, issued by the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC) placing him on the Army of the United States Retired List on 1 November 2014 in the rank of SPC.

10.  His record does not contain orders promoting him to the rank of SGT.  His record does not contain any evidence that shows he ever served in the USAR in the rank of SGT and was subsequently reduced to the rank of SPC through no fault of his own.

11.  His record does not contain any evidence that shows he ever requested or was denied attendance at a military school.

12.  Army Regulation 135-180 (Qualifying Service for Retired Pay Nonregular Service), paragraph 1-4, states that retired pay is pay granted to Soldiers and former Reserve Component Soldiers under Title 10, U.S. Code, after completion of 20 or more years of qualifying service and upon attaining age 60.  This pay is based on the highest grade satisfactorily held at any time during an individual's entire period of service, other than in an inactive section of a Reserve Component.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  By law, a person granted retired pay will receive such pay in the highest grade satisfactorily held by him or her during his or her entire period of service.  The evidence of record shows the highest grade the applicant held while serving in the USAR was SPC. 

2.  In the absence of evidence that shows he was promoted to the rank of SGT and satisfactorily served in the rank of SGT during his service in the USAR prior to his transfer to the Retired Reserve on 30 May 2004, there is insufficient evidence upon which to grant him the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ___x____  ___x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   x_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20150000787



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20150000787



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001046

    Original file (20130001046.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In the Record of Proceedings (ROP), Discussions and Conclusions, paragraph 2, the Board states that "there is no evidence in the available record, nor has he submitted any evidence, showing he has yet been promoted or recommended for promotion to SSG even after the security clearance process was completed." Without the security clearance, the applicant was not promoted. Although in a previous advisory opinion an NGB official stated the applicant was granted a security clearance in February...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003799

    Original file (20140003799.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence in his records that confirms he was recommended for promotion to SSG and/or he appeared before a promotion board at the battalion/unit level, or his name was incorporated on the promotion list. There is no evidence in his records, and he provides none to show he was recommended for promotion to SGT/E-5, re-appeared before a promotion board, and/or he was promoted back to SGT/E-5 prior to his discharge from active duty. Although he was promoted in the ARNG to SGT/E-5 on...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014344

    Original file (20100014344.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was placed on the Retired List in the pay grade E-8. Army Regulation 135-180 (Qualifying Service for Retired Pay Nonregular Service), paragraph 2-11c states that the Retired Activities Directorate, U. S. Army Reserve Personnel Center will screen each retirement applicant's record to determine the highest grade held by him or her during his or her military service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011355

    Original file (20110011355.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * Self-authored statement * 20-Year Letter, dated 20 April 2000 * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 13 June 1991 * Undated memorandum, subject: Enrollment in Phase I Course * Active duty order * 3 Certificates (Army Achievement Medal, Outstanding Dedicated Service, Honorable Discharge) * DA Form 2173 (Statement of Medical Examination and Duty Status), dated 1 June 1998 * Released from active duty (REFRAD) order *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003466

    Original file (20120003466.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he retired from the Army National Guard (ARNG) in the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5 instead of specialist (SPC)/E-4. In the case of a person who is entitled to retired pay under section 12731 of this title, the retired pay base is the monthly basic pay, determined at the rates applicable on the date when retired pay is granted, of the highest grade held satisfactorily by the person at any time in the armed forces. As a result, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004051

    Original file (20120004051.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Beyond his service in the RA where he was honorably REFRAD after completing over 4 years of active service to attend school, there is no indication he performed any further period of active service of 90 continuous days or more that would have resulted in the issuance of a subsequent DD Form 214. His record further shows that as a USAR Soldier, he was ordered to active duty to attend AT for a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020701

    Original file (20110020701.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Although the DA Form 1059 for the rating period ending 31 July 2007 and orders dated January and June 2008 show his rank as SGT, his records do not contain promotion orders or any other documentation that shows he held this rank at the time of his active duty service from 22 September 2006 to 31 July 2007. In the absence of promotion orders that show he was promoted to the rank of SGT prior to his release from active duty on 31 July 2007, there is insufficient evidence upon which to grant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017552

    Original file (20080017552.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his military records to show that he was discharged in the rank of sergeant (SGT), pay grade E-5. The available evidence of record shows: a. Subsequent orders, dated in 2002 and 2004, show his rank as SPC.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007809

    Original file (20090007809.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement or discharge. It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement or discharge. With respect to any financial hardship, while the Board is sympathetic to this issue, the evidence of record shows that the applicant was issued an order to active duty, an order for his release from active duty, and a DD Form 214 to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002753

    Original file (20090002753.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the National Defense Service Medal and the Army Commendation Medal; any other awards, decorations, and campaign ribbons he may have earned; and promotion to the next higher grade. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military awards) provides for award of the National Defense Service Medal. With respect to award of the National Defense Service Medal, the evidence of record shows that the applicant was ordered to ADT and entered active...