Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015750
Original file (20110015750.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  28 February 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110015750 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) from "Hardship" to "Dependency."

2.  The applicant states he returned from Iraq a couple of months earlier due to his wife's medical condition.  He returned on emergency leave and continued his U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) duties.  He came back to take care of his wife.  The proper term should have been "Dependency."

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214 for the period ending on 29 March 2006.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  Having had prior service, the applicant enlisted in the USAR on 20 April 1985. He served through multiple reenlistments in a variety of stateside assignments and he attained the rank/grade of master sergeant/E-8.

3.  He was ordered to active duty on 15 May 2005 in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom and he subsequently served in Kuwait/Iraq from 13 August 2005 to 20 January 2006.  

4.  The facts and circumstances surrounding his release from active duty are not available for review with this case.  However, his duly-constituted DD Form 214 shows he was honorably released from active duty on 29 March 2006 under the provisions of paragraph 6-3b of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations) by reason of hardship.

5.  The case analyst of record contacted the applicant on 30 January 2012 and requested his complete separation packet but the applicant indicated his did not have it.

6.  Army Regulation 634-200 provides for the separation of enlisted Soldiers.  

	a.  Paragraph 6-3 states that Soldiers on active duty may be discharged or released because of genuine dependency or hardship.  Dependency exists when death or disability of a member of a Soldier’s (or spouse’s) immediate family causes that member to rely upon the Soldier for principal care or support.  Hardship exists when in circumstances not involving death or disability of a member of the Soldier’s (or spouse’s) immediate family, separation from the Service will materially affect the care or support of the family by alleviating undue and genuine hardship. 

	b.  Paragraph 6-4 states separation from the service of Soldiers because of dependency will be granted when all the following circumstances exist: conditions have arisen or have been aggravated to an excessive degree since entry on active duty, conditions are not of a temporary nature, every reasonable effort has been made by the Soldier to alleviate the dependency or hardship conditions without success, and separation from active military service of the Soldier is the only readily available means of eliminating or materially alleviating the dependency or hardship conditions.

	c.  Paragraph 6-6 (Application for Separation) states the Soldier must request, in writing, separation from the Service because of dependency or hardship.  Supporting evidence must be provided.  


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant's release from active duty are not available for review with this case.  However, his duly-constituted DD Form 214 shows he entered active duty on 15 May 2006 and he was released from active duty on 29 March 2006 by reason of hardship.

2.  In the absence of evidence to the contrary, it is presumed the narrative reason for his separation is correct and he provides no evidence to show otherwise.  Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to grant him the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ___X ___  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110015750





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110015750



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006129

    Original file (20090006129.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant states that he was released from active duty due to the death of his mother which is the criteria for a dependency discharge as opposed to a hardship discharge as defined in the regulation. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014937

    Original file (20130014937.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected by adding the entry “Hardship Discharge” to the narrative reason for his separation. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082300C070215

    Original file (2002082300C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That the reason and authority for his discharge be corrected from Dependency to Hardship. In support of his request, he submits a letter from the DVA dated 9 October 2002, which informed the applicant that DVA medical benefits are limited to those soldiers who served 24 months of active duty unless discharged for hardship or disability.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009392

    Original file (20090009392.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his bad conduct discharge to a hardship discharge. Conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable laws and regulations, and the discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which the applicant was convicted. The applicant was given a bad conduct discharge pursuant to an approved sentence of a General Court-Martial.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013887

    Original file (20130013887.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show in item 26 (Separation Code) the code "KDB" and in item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) the reason as "Unable to Continue Service due to Death of a Child/Hardship." The facts and circumstances surrounding his discharge are not present in the available records; however, his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012013

    Original file (20080012013.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests reconsideration of the Board's denial of her previous request for change of the authority and narrative reason for her separation, from Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), Chapter 8 (Pregnancy) to Chapter 6 (Hardship). In its first consideration of this case, the Board concluded that evidence of record showed a properly constituted DD Form 214 that confirmed the applicant was released from active duty on 12 May 2000 under the provisions of Army Regulation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004075

    Original file (20090004075.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    BOARD DATE: 23 JULY 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090004075 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Paragraph 6-3 of Army Regulation 635-200 states that Soldiers of the Active Army and the Reserve Components may be discharged or released because of genuine dependency or hardship. Evidence of record shows the applicant requested a hardship discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019888

    Original file (20140019888.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The available records do not show she requested a hardship discharge prior to release from active duty service. On 10 September 2002, the applicant was honorably released from active duty service due to pregnancy under Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 8 and she was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve. _________X_______________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013889

    Original file (20140013889.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 13 November 1990, the applicant requested separation from the U.S. Army under paragraph 5-8, Army Regulation 635-200. On 14 December 1990, consistent with the recommendations of the applicant's chain of command, the separation authority approved the applicant's separation in accordance with Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-8, for the inability to perform prescribed duties due to parenthood with an honorable characterization of service. Every case is individually decided based upon...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070013182

    Original file (20070013182.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    In her self-authored statement, dated 13 August 2007, the applicant describes her difficulties adjusting to a predominantly male Army and describes occasions of sexual harassment she encountered during her military service. The applicant was neither married nor had any children during her military service. The applicant was discharged under the provisions of chapter 13 of Army Regulation 635-200.