Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082300C070215
Original file (2002082300C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 3 June 2003
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002082300

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Edmund P. Mercanti Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. Joann H. Langston Chairperson
Ms. Jennifer L. Prater Member
Mr. Paul M. Smith Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: That the reason and authority for his discharge be corrected from Dependency to Hardship.

APPLICANT STATES: His father was 100 percent disabled when he was on active duty, and he was discharged to provide care for his father. He is now unable to qualify for Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) benefits because of the narrative reason and authority for his discharge.

In support of his request, he submits a letter from the DVA dated 9 October 2002, which informed the applicant that DVA medical benefits are limited to those soldiers who served 24 months of active duty unless discharged for hardship or disability. The DVA continues that if the applicant’s reason for discharge was changed to hardship, he would be entitled to medical benefits.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

He enlisted in the Regular Army on 17 January 1984. He was awarded the military occupational specialty of combat engineer, and was promoted to pay grade E-2.

On 20 May 1985, the applicant submitted an FC Form 2202, Application for Hardship or Dependency Separation. In that request, he stated that his father was in a “serious” state of health, and needed him back home to lift him and to help perform daily household chores. In support of that request, the applicant’s mother submitted a statement saying that the applicant’s father had been having seizures and had fallen on several occasions. Since he was too heavy for her to lift, her son’s presence at home would help improve the well being of both the applicant’s parents.

The applicant’s request was approved and he was honorably released from active duty on 3 June 1985. His separation document shows that he was released from active duty due to dependency.

Army Regulation 635-200 dated 1 October 1982, paragraph 6-3, states that dependency exists when death or disability of a member of a soldier’s (or spouse’s) immediate family causes that member to rely upon the soldier for principal care or support. This paragraph states that hardship exists when in circumstances not involving death or disability of a member of the soldier’s (or spouse’s) immediate family, separation from the Service will materially affect the care or support of the family by alleviating undue or genuine hardship.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record and applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. The applicant was granted a discharge to provide physical aid to his father due to his father’s deteriorating health. That scenario falls directly into the definition of dependency, that dependency exists when death or disability of a member of a soldier’s (or spouse’s) immediate family causes that member to rely upon the soldier for principal care or support.

2. In order for the Board to change the applicant’s dependency discharge to a hardship separation, it would have to be shown that his discharge was based on circumstances not involving death or disability of a member of his immediate family, and that his discharge from the Service materially affected the care or support of his family by alleviating undue or genuine hardship. There is no evidence or indication that this was the case with the applicant.

3. While it is understandable that the applicant believes that his dependency discharge should be treated the same as a hardship discharge to qualify for DVA benefits, that is an issue that he must pursue with that Department, not the Army. The applicant was properly discharged due to dependency, not hardship.

4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___jhl ___ ____jlp __ ___pms _ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2002082300
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 20030603
TYPE OF DISCHARGE (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006129

    Original file (20090006129.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant states that he was released from active duty due to the death of his mother which is the criteria for a dependency discharge as opposed to a hardship discharge as defined in the regulation. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015750

    Original file (20110015750.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, his duly-constituted DD Form 214 shows he was honorably released from active duty on 29 March 2006 under the provisions of paragraph 6-3b of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations) by reason of hardship. a. Paragraph 6-3 states that Soldiers on active duty may be discharged or released because of genuine dependency or hardship. c. Paragraph 6-6 (Application for Separation) states the Soldier must request, in writing, separation from the Service because of dependency or hardship.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014937

    Original file (20130014937.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected by adding the entry “Hardship Discharge” to the narrative reason for his separation. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004075

    Original file (20090004075.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    BOARD DATE: 23 JULY 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090004075 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Paragraph 6-3 of Army Regulation 635-200 states that Soldiers of the Active Army and the Reserve Components may be discharged or released because of genuine dependency or hardship. Evidence of record shows the applicant requested a hardship discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009589

    Original file (20120009589.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 5 October 2009, the applicant's commander notified him that he was initiating action to separate him under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel) for commission of serious offenses. Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 6, provides that Soldiers on active duty may be discharged or released because of genuine dependency or hardship. However, his military records show he was separated for commission of the serious offenses of being AWOL from on...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003780

    Original file (20110003780.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DA Form 4856 completed on that date shows his drill sergeant stated: PVT [Applicant], on 26 September 2007, you were counseled on the unfortunate death of your sister and the concern you had for your parents' emotional well being. His record is void of documentation showing he applied for a discharge due to hardship or dependency when he returned to duty after his convalescent leave and the death of his sister. The applicant should note that because he was in an entry-level status,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005588

    Original file (20130005588.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-200 provides for the separation of enlisted Soldiers. The evidence of record confirms the applicant was honorably released from active duty on 5 September 1997 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-8 by reason of hardship with an SPD code of "MDB." An RE code of 3 is the correct code for Soldiers separated by reason of hardship.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060211C070421

    Original file (2001060211C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 7 February 2001, the applicant submitted a formal personnel action request for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 6, paragraph 6-5, due to dependency of a family member. He stated in his request that the applicant’s son required special attention due to an automobile accident, was confined to a wheelchair, and required constant care and supervision. The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant requested to be discharged under the provisions of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020230

    Original file (20110020230.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests her narrative reason for separation be changed from personality disorder to hardship. Army Regulation 635-200 states Soldiers on active duty may be discharged or released because of genuine dependency or hardship. ___________X____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001371

    Original file (20150001371.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    As a specialist/E-4, his monthly salary and his mother's income were not enough to cover the mortgage on the home. He initiated a request to be separated from the Army under a family hardship, but was told by others that due to stop-loss conditions within the Army his request would not be granted. There is no evidence in his available military personnel records and he did not provide substantiating evidence that shows he was undergoing a family hardship significant enough to merit a...