IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 19 January 2012
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110015099
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM), Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) with 2 or 3 bronze service stars, Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross (RVNGC) with Palm Unit Citation, Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal (RVNCAHM) First Class (FC) Unit Citation, and any other unit awards he is eligible for based on his service in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN).
2. The applicant states the awards he was eligible for at the time he left the RVN were left off his DD Form 214.
3. The applicant provides:
* his DD Form 214
* a National Personnel Records Center (NPRC) letter, dated 13 June 2011
* his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record)
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the
3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicants failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 25 February 1969. He was trained in and awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 12B (Combat Engineer). He was promoted to specialist five (SP5)/E-5 on 20 July 1970, which is the highest rank/grade he attained while serving on active duty.
3. His DA Form 20 shows in:
* item 31 (Foreign Service) he served in the RVN from 6 September 1969 through 1 October 1970
* item 38 (Record of Assignments) he was assigned to Company D,
27th Engineer Battalion from 11 September 1969 to 29 September 1970 in the RVN
* item 38 he received all excellent conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his service
4. The applicants Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) is void of any documents or a unit commander's disqualification that would have precluded him from being awarded the first award of the AGCM.
5. On 3 October 1970, the applicant was honorably released from active duty after completing 1 year, 7 months, and 9 days of total active service. Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the DD Form 214 he was issued at the time shows the:
* National Defense Service Medal
* 2 Overseas Service Bars
* VSM
* RVN Campaign Medal
* Parachutist Badge
* Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14 and M-16)
6. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) contains the Army's awards policy. Paragraph 2-13 contains guidance for the VSM. It states a bronze
service star is authorized with this award for each campaign a member is credited with participating in while serving in the RVN. Table B-1 contains a list of campaigns and shows that during the applicant's tenure of assignment in the RVN, participation credit was granted for the following four campaigns for the periods indicated:
* Vietnam Summer-Fall 1969, 9 June - 31 October 1969
* Vietnam Winter-Spring 1970, 1 November 1969 - 30 April 1970
* Sanctuary Counteroffensive, 1 May - 30 June 1970
* Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase VII, 1 July 1970 - 30 June 1971
7. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the AGCM was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for the first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year. The enlisted person must have had all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings. There must have been no convictions by a
court-martial.
8. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) assists commanders in determining or establishing the eligibility of individual members for campaign participation credit, assault landing credit, and unit citation badges awarded during the Vietnam Conflict. It shows that during the applicant's tenure of assignment in the RVN, his unit, Company D, 27th Engineer Company was cited for award of the Meritorious Unit Commendation (MUC) for the period 1 March - 31 October 1969 by Department of the Army General Order Number (DAGO) 24, dated 1972.
9. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3, paragraph 6d states that DAGO Number 8, dated 1974, announced award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation to Headquarters, U.S. Army Vietnam, and its subordinate units, during the period
20 July 1965 to 28 March 1973.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant's request that the AGCM, VSM with 2 or 3 bronze service stars, RVNGC with Palm Unit Citation, RVNCAHM FC Unit Citation, and all other unit awards he is entitled to based on his service in the RVN be added to his
DD Form 214 has been carefully considered and found to have partial merit.
2. The evidence of record confirms the applicant received all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings through his service. Further, his record is void of any derogatory information or a unit commander's disqualification that would have precluded him from being awarded the first award of the AGCM. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the AGCM for the period 25 February 1969 through 3 October 1970 and to correct his DD Form 214 to show this award.
3. The evidence of record also confirms that based on his RVN service and campaign participation he is entitled to the MUC, RVNGC with Palm Unit Citation, and the VSM with four bronze service stars. Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show these awards.
4. The applicants request to add the RVNCAHM FC Unit Citation was also considered. However, his RVN unit was not cited for this award during his period of service with his unit. Therefore, there is no basis for granting this period of his request.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
___X ___ ____X___ ____X __ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
1. The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:
a. deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal;
b. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period
25 February 1969 through 3 October 1970; and
c. adding to item 24 of his DD Form 214 the:
* Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award)
* Vietnam Service Medal with 4 bronze service stars
* Meritorious Unit Commendation
* Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation
2. The Board further determined the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to award of the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation.
_______ _ X______ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110015099
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110015099
4
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080348C070215
The Board finds that the evidence of record establishes that he was injured in combat in Vietnam on 4 September 1970 and that he is entitled to an award of the Purple Heart for that injury at this time. After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that the applicant should have received the AGCM for his service from 6 August 1969 through 5 August 1971. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087226C070212
The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant was awarded two awards of the Purple Heart; however, an administrative oversight at the time of separation resulted in one award being omitted from his DD Form 214. After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that the applicant should have received the AGCM for his service from 21 March 1967 through 11 January 1970. RECOMMENDATION : That all of the Department of the Army records related to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003435
The regulation also states, in pertinent part, that for first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950, a period of service of less than 3 years but more than 1 year qualifies for award of the AGCM. Although there are no orders awarding him the AGCM, after carefully examining the applicants record of service, it was determined that the applicant should have received the AGCM for his service from 16 September 1968 through 22 April 1970. Therefore, since he had...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040004157C070208
Linda M. Barker | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief and to excuse failure to timely file. The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090343C070212
On 6 November 1963, he transferred to Vietnam with his unit. While in Vietnam, his commander submitted a recommendation to award the applicant the award of the Silver Star for gallantry in action in Vietnam on 2 and 3 March 1964. The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant was awarded the BSM with "V" Device that was not included on his DD Form 214 at the time of separation.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091247C070212
Although the evidence does not clearly establish the date the applicant was promoted to the pay grade of E-5, documents contained in his records that are dated as early as 16 August 1969 and all the way through the date of his REFRAD, indicate his rank as that of a sergeant. After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that the applicant should have received the AGCM for his service from 28 November 1967 through 13 August 1970. As a result, the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023206
Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of the applicants DA Form 20 shows he earned the following awards during his active duty tenure: * National Defense Service Medal (NDSM) * Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) * RVNCM with Device 1960 * AM * Bronze Star Medal (BSM) * Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) 6. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the AGCM first award for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 11 May 1967 through 8 May 1970 and to add this award to his DD Form...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013439
His DD Form 214, item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized), lists the following earned awards: * NDSM * RVNCM with Device * Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) * ARCOM 8. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the AGCM for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 30 November 1965 through 13 November 1967, and to add this award to his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002427
Therefore, it would be appropriate and serve the interest of justice and equity to award him the first award of the AGCM for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 9 July 1968 through 20 April 1970, and to add this award to his record and DD Form 214. Notwithstanding the staff DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS above, the Board believed that the evidence concerning the Army Commendation Medal, i.e., the award certificate, was insufficient without corroborating orders to support...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022873
The applicant requests that he be awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) and that his records be corrected to reflect award of the: * Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) with the appropriate number of bronze service stars * Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation * Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation * Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with M-16, M-14 and grenade bars * Any other unit awards he is entitled 2. Army Regulation...