Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014753
Original file (20110014753.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		

		BOARD DATE:	  21 September 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110014753 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his military records to show his officer accession bonus (OAB) contract was signed prior to his oaths of office.  

2.  The applicant states:

	a.  Prior to attending officer candidate school (OCS) at Fort McClellan, AL, he was told that since he was 39 years of age he should board for his commission prior to leaving so he could be commissioned upon his graduation from OCS.  His 40th birthday was on 31 March 2008 a few weeks after graduation and the concern was any delay in his commissioning might make him ineligible.  When he graduated from OCS, Lieutenant Colonel (LTC) MB came from Michigan to swear him in.  He was the only Michigan Army National Guard (MIARNG) Soldier to commission that day and the only Soldier from his class that did not receive full payment of the $10,000.00 OAB.  LTC MB did not bring the OAB Addendum when she came for the graduation so he was unable to sign it at that time.  The addendum was not signed until the OCS paperwork was processed on 31 March 2008.

	b.  After completing the Officer Basic Course (OBC), he requested to have the first half of his bonus paid.  Due to a problem with the Federal Recognition, he was not paid the first installment of $5,000.00 until 2 February 2009 and was told he would be paid the next installment on 7 March 2011.  Once this date passed, he inquired about his OAB through Sergeant First Class (SFC) KMM, the MIARNG State Incentive Manager.  She found out that the discrepancy in the date he took the oaths of office and the date he signed the OAB Addendum was the reason he had not been paid the second installment of the bonus.

	c.  In May 2011, SFC KMM submitted an exception to policy request to the National Guard Bureau (NGB) requesting authorization for payment of the second installment of the OAB.  The request was denied.

3.  The applicant provides DA Form 71 (Oath of Office), OAB Addendum, four memoranda, and 10 pages of email.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant's records show he was appointed as a Transportation Corps second lieutenant in the MIARNG in the critical area of concentration (AOC) skill of 88D (Motor/Rail Transportation Officer) and executed the oaths of office on 8 March 2008.  

2.  In connection with his appointment, he and his recruiter signed an OAB Addendum on 31 March 2008.  Paragraph 3d of this form stated "I am being accessed into an MTO&E (modified table of organization and equipment) unit that is not identified as an NGB critical UIC (unit identification code).  I shall receive a bonus of $10,000.00 paid in two 50 percent installments.  The first 50 percent installment is payable upon successful completion of OBC and the second and final installment is payable on the third-year anniversary of my commission/appointment date."

3.  On 18 May 2011, the MIARNG submitted a request to the NGB for an exception to policy to grant an OAB to the applicant.  The request stated, in pertinent part:

	a.  The applicant's 40th birthday was on 31 March 2008, three weeks after he would graduate from OCS.  He was advised to complete his oaths of office immediately in order to avoid any delays that could prevent him from commissioning.

	b.  He took his oaths of office upon completion of OCS on 8 March 2008.  He was eligible to receive an OAB at that time but no addendum was completed.  After he returned to Michigan the addendum paperwork was completed and signed.

	c.  The witnessing officer to the applicant's addendum was later relieved of his duties as he oversaw the completion of multiple erroneously executed OAB Addenda.  [The Applicant] entered this agreement in good faith that he was eligible to receive the incentive and had no way of knowing he had to sign the agreement upon taking the oaths of office.  He followed the guidance he was given and believed he would receive this incentive upon his commissioning.

4.  On 1 June 2011, an official at the NGB, denied the request for an exception to policy.  The official stated the applicant accepted a commission in the MIARNG on 8 March 2008 into the critical AOC skill of 88D.  The Soldier did not sign the OAB Addendum until 31 March 2008 and had been paid the initial half of the incentive in the amount of $5,000.00.  Selective Reserve Incentive Programs (SRIP) Policy Number 07-06 stated "Applicants must sign their bonus addenda on the date they accept their commission."  The Army may not pay a bonus retroactively absent a specific statutory grant of authority.  The official further stated the applicant could file a claim with the Army Board for Correction of Military Records if he believed an error or injustice existed.

5.  Title 37, U.S. code, chapter 5, section 324, provides for an OAB for new officers in critical skills.

	a.  Under regulations prescribed by the Secretary concerned, a person who executes a written agreement to accept a commission or an appointment as an officer of the Armed Forces and to serve on active duty in a designated critical officer skill for the period specified in the agreement may, upon acceptance of the agreement by the Secretary concerned, be paid an OAB in an amount determined by the Secretary concerned.

	b.  The Secretary concerned shall designate the critical officer skills for the purposes of this section.  A skill may be designated as a critical officer skill for an Armed Force under this subsection if, (1) in order to meet requirements of the Armed Force, it is critical for the Armed Force to have a sufficient number of officers who are qualified in that skill; and (2) in order to mitigate a current or projected significant shortage of personnel in the Armed Force who are qualified in that skill, it is critical to access into that Armed Force in sufficient numbers persons who are qualified in that skill or are to be trained in that skill.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows that at the time the applicant took the oaths of office on 8 March 2008, AOC 88D was listed as a designated critical officer skill and an OAB of $10,000.00 was offered for appointment in this AOC.  

2.  It appears his recruiting officials gave him incorrect advice when he was told to take his oaths of office on one date and sign his OAB Addendum on a later date.  It is evident that an error was committed when his addendum was not signed until 31 March 2008.  But regardless of the discrepancy in the date of his oaths of office and addendum, he acted in good faith and in accordance with the advice of recruiting officials.  He should not be penalized for an error committed by MIARNG recruiting officials.

3.  The applicant met all of the requirements he agreed to on his OAB Addendum contract; therefore, he should be entitled to receive payment of the bonus.

BOARD VOTE:

__x____  ___x____  ___x_____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army and State Army National Guard records of the individual concerned be corrected to show: 

* he signed his OAB Addendum on 8 March 2008 for the bonus in the amount of $10,000.00
* he is eligible for payment of the bonus in accordance with the terms of his addendum contract
* his OAB as specified in his addendum contract is to be paid from ARNG funds



      _______ _x   _______   ___
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110014753





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110014753



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023493

    Original file (20100023493.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 5 May 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100023493 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. It appears the Incentive Manager Office of the MIARNG requested an exception to policy to allow the applicant to receive the OAB. The State Incentive Manager will verify accession packets as prescribed by state policy for bonus control numbers, accuracy of enlistment contract and bonus addendum, critical skill and bonus unit eligibility, valid position vacancy, and required...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018238

    Original file (20130018238.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * DD Form 293 (Application for the Review of Discharge from the Armed Forces of the United States) * self-authored statements * Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) Record of Proceedings AR20090007581, dated 16 June 2009 * OAB Agreement * 2 ETP Denial Letters, dated 7 June 2013 and 1 July 2013 * Honorable Discharge Certificate * NGB Form 22 * NGB Form 337 (Oaths of Office) CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The NGB ETP denial letters both show: * the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008156

    Original file (20140008156.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * the correct copy of the OAB Addendum was discovered after the denial of his exception to policy by the National Guard Bureau (NGB) * the incomplete addendum was initially provided in the Guard Incentive Management System for payment submission * the Officer Strength Manager, who also was the witnessing official, discovered the correct addendum * after the correct addendum was submitted, another discrepancy was discovered in relation to the area of concentration...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022438

    Original file (20120022438.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests payment of the second $5,000.00 installment of his officer accession bonus (OAB). NGB denied the applicant's request to receive his OAB because the service representative and a witnessing officer failed to sign the addendum and advised the applicant to apply to this Board. As a result, the Board recommends that all State Army National Guard and Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing all parties concerned properly...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020643

    Original file (20130020643.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The OAB addendum stated the applicant agreed to serve in CS AOC 88D; however, he did not attend BOLC for 88D and the unit he was assigned to did not have any 88D slots. The applicant attended BOLC for 88A, which was also a CS AOC at the time he signed the OAB addendum, and he is slotted in an 88A position. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army and state ARNG records of the individual concerned be corrected to show: * the 15 August 2011 Written Agreement – OAB...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004726

    Original file (20120004726.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests payment of a $10,000.00 officer accession bonus (OAB) for his appointment as a second lieutenant (2LT) in the Michigan Army National Guard (MIARNG). The evidence of record shows an OAB Addendum was executed for the applicant on or about the date he took the oaths of office on 19 December 2007 for an OAB of $10,000. As a result, the Board recommends that the State Army National Guard records and the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020949

    Original file (20130020949.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He stated he had received the first installment of $5,000.00 on 17 June 2011 and that although the Bonus Addendum could not be located, the incentive was offered at the time of his commission. The applicant enlisted in the FLARNG on 21 August 2008. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army and state ARNG records of the individual concerned be corrected to show: * the 20 March 2010, a Written Agreement – OAB Addendum, was properly prepared with a Bonus Control...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021537

    Original file (20120021537.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was transferred to the MNARNG and executed an oath of office as an ARNG commissioned officer on 15 May 2006. The ARNG offers a $10,000.00 Officer Accession/Affiliation Bonus to newly-commissioned officers and newly-appointed warrant officers who agree to serve 6 years in a critical UIC. Although an OAB was offered at the time for his specialty, there is no evidence he executed a written agreement regarding this bonus.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013837

    Original file (20130013837.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR) to show she entered into an Officer Accession Bonus (OAB) contract on 7 July 2007, met all of the requirements outlined in her OAB contract, and qualified for the bonus payment. The applicant states she contracted for the OAB. The incentive manager argued that he applicant had contracted for 88D AOC which was a critical AOC at the time the applicant was commissioned.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011090

    Original file (20130011090.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant received a $10,000.00 OAB and $12,000.00 under the SLRP. (2) If the applicant had been receiving the SLRP, she would not have been eligible for the OAB. Having already enlisted, the applicant was not eligible to receive SLRP at the time she did; therefore, the $12,000.00 should be recouped.