Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014747
Original file (20110014747.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  19 January 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110014747 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart (PH). 

2.  The applicant states he is requesting award of the PH for an injury he received in a combat situation in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) that required hospitalization.  

3.  The applicant provides a self-authored statement in support of his application. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.



2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army, on 31 March 1970, and he was trained in and awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman).  

3.  The applicant’s DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in the RVN from 31 August 1970 through 30 August 1971.  Item 38 (Record of Assignments) shows that during his RVN tour he was assigned to the Company A, 1st Battalion, 20th Infantry Regiment, performing duties in MOS 11B as a rifleman.  Item 40 (Wounds) is blank and the PH is not included in the list of awards contained in item 41 (Awards and Decorations).  

4.  The applicant’s Military Personnel Records Jacket is void of orders or documents indicating he was wounded in action in the RVN.  It is also void of medical treatment records indicating he was treated for a combat-related wound.

5.  On 21 January 1972, the applicant was honorably released from active duty after completing 1 year, 9 months, and 21 days of active military service.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) shows he earned the following awards: 

* National Defense Service Medal
* Vietnam Service Medal with 2 bronze service stars 
* RVN Campaign Medal 
* Army Commendation Medal with “V” (Valor) Device
* Combat Infantryman Badge
* Bronze Star Medal 
* Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Pistol Bar
* Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar

6.  During the review of this case, a member of the Boards staff reviewed the Department of the Army (DA) Vietnam Casualty Roster.  This roster does not contain an entry pertaining to the applicant.  

7.  A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System, an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the United States Army Human Resources Command also failed to reveal any orders for the PH pertaining to the applicant.



8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides the Army's awards policy.  Paragraph 2-8 contains guidance on the PH.  It states the PH is awarded to members wounded in action.  It also states in order to award the PH there must be evidence of the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action, the wound required treatment by medical personnel, and a record of the medical treatment was made a matter of official record.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s request to be awarded the PH has been carefully considered.  However, there is insufficient evidence to support this claim.  By regulation, in order to support award of the PH there must be evidence that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action, that it required treatment by medical personnel, and a record of the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.  

2.  By the applicant’s own admission, his injury was the result of him accidently falling and it was not caused by enemy action.  His record is void of any entries or documents corroborating his claim that he was wounded in action in the RVN, or that shows he was ever treated for a combat-related wound by medical personnel while serving in the RVN.  Item 40 of his DA Form 20 is blank which indicates he was never wounded in action.  Further, there is no entry pertaining to the applicant on the Vietnam casualty listing, the official DA list of RVN casualties.  Absent any evidence the applicant was wounded as a result of enemy action while serving in the RVN, the regulatory burden of proof necessary to support award of the PH has not been satisfied in this case. 

3.  The applicant and all others concerned should know this action related to award of the PH in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by him in service to our Nation.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   X_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110014747



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110014747



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011344

    Original file (20120011344.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). It states in order to support award of the PH there must be evidence that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action; that it required treatment by military medical personnel; and a record of the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record. The applicant’s request for award of the PH has been carefully considered.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120012044

    Original file (20120012044.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time shows he completed 2 years of active military service. It states in order to support award of the PH there must be evidence that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action; that it required treatment by military medical personnel; and a record of the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record. By regulation, in order to support award of the PH there must be evidence the wound for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001818

    Original file (20120001818.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant's record is void of any entries or documents corroborating his claim that he was wounded in action in the RVN or that show he was ever treated for a combat-related wound by medical personnel while serving in the RVN. The applicant's record is void of any documents or orders indicating he was ever recommended for or awarded the AM by proper authority during his active duty tenure and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010212

    Original file (20120010212.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) prepared during this enlistment on 2 March 1977 does not include the PH in the list of awards contained in item 9 (Awards, Decorations and Campaigns). It states in order to support award of the PH there must be evidence that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action, the wound must have required treatment by military medical personnel, and a record of the medical treatment must have been made a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016968

    Original file (20080016968.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Absent any evidence of record confirming that the head wound the applicant suffered referred to in the third-party statement was received as a result of enemy action, or that he was ever treated for a combat-related wound or injury while serving in the RVN, the regulatory burden of proof necessary to support award of the PH has not been satisfied in this case. In order to justify correction of a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004005

    Original file (20120004005.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). It states in order to support award of the PH there must be evidence that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action; that it required treatment by military medical personnel; and a record of the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record. By regulation, in order to support award of the PH there must be evidence the wound for which...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014978

    Original file (20090014978.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) from 21 April 1969 through 1 April 1971. Item 40 (Wounds) of the applicant's DA Form 20 is blank and the PH is not included in the list of earned awards entered in item 41 (Awards and Decorations).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000607

    Original file (20080000607.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    x The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. However, by regulation, in order to support award of the PH there must be evidence that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action; that the wound required treatment by military medical personnel; and a record of this medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record. In order to justify correction of a military record the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010535

    Original file (20120010535.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) contains the Army’s awards policy. The applicant and all others concerned to know that this action related to award of the PH in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to our Nation.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004975

    Original file (20120004975.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant’s Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) is void of orders or other documents indicating he was awarded the PH by proper authority while serving on active duty. Although the record contains indications the applicant suffered from shoulder problems while serving on active duty, there is no evidence of record or independent evidence provided by the applicant confirming that this...