Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014313
Original file (20110014313.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  10 January 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110014313 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to reflect his rank as corporal (CPL) instead of specialist four (SP4).

2.  The applicant states he should have been laterally appointed as a CPL because he graduated from the Noncommissioned Officer (NCO) Academy.

3.  The applicant provides no additional evidence.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 12 January 1977 for a period of 3 years, training as an infantryman, and assignment to Europe.  He completed basic training at Fort Bliss, Texas, and advanced individual training at Fort Benning, Georgia, before being transferred to Germany for assignment to an artillery battery as a security guard.

3.  He was advanced to the rank of SP4 on 7 June 1978.  On 6 October 1978, he graduated from the Primary Noncommissioned Officer Course (PNCOC) – Combat Arms.

4.  He continued to serve in the rank of SP4 until he was honorably released from active duty 11 January 1980 due to completion of required service.  He completed 3 years of total active service.

5.  Army Regulation 600-200 (Enlisted Personnel Management System), in effect at the time, served as the authority for enlisted promotions.  It provided that a commander could laterally appoint members serving in the rank of SP4 to the rank of CPL upon completion of an NCO-producing course provided the table of distribution for the unit allowed for such ranks.  The table of distribution for combat arms units provided allowances for one CPL for each 12 SP4's.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that he should have been appointed as a CPL upon graduation from PNCOC has been noted and appears to lack merit.

2.  The regulation in effect at the time provided that commanders could appoint members to rank of CPL upon completion of a NCO-producing course provided the table of distribution for the unit allowed such appointments.  While it is difficult at best to determine what happened 30+ years ago, it must be presumed that the commander either did not elect to appoint the applicant as a CPL or the unit's table of distribution at the time did not allow him to do so.

3.  In any event, it was the commander's decision at the time and the applicant failed to show through the evidence of record or evidence submitted with his application that an error or injustice exists in his case.

4.  Accordingly, there appears to be no basis to grant the applicant's request for appointment as a CPL.



BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X___  ___X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   X___   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110014313



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110014313



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005048

    Original file (20140005048.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his military education and that he was promoted to sergeant (SGT)/pay grade E-5. Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this military education. Thus, the evidence of record shows the applicant's DD Form 214 shows his correct rank, grade, and effective date.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006327

    Original file (20130006327.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents that must be prepared for Soldiers on retirement, discharge, or release from active duty service or control of the Active Army. Although he may have served in the rank of CPL at one time, the available record does not contain any information that shows, and the applicant has not provided any orders or other evidence that conclusively shows, he was ever laterally appointed to the rank of CPL. In addition, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004544

    Original file (20120004544.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, his record and item 4a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show his rank as corporal (CPL). Item 35 (Record of Assignments) of the DA Form 2-1 shows the applicant was assigned to WRAMC on 27 February 1979, and that he served as a military policeman in MOS 95B during his entire enlistment. The evidence of record indicates the applicant held the rank title SP4 on the date of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016684

    Original file (20080016684.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his completion of the Primary Leadership Development Course (PLDC) and his German Marksmanship Award for weapons qualification be added to his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with a separation date of 5 May 1989. The applicant states that at the time of his separation all of the information was not taken from his "201 file" (DA Form 201 [Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ), United States Army]). The applicant's military...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013107

    Original file (20140013107.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his correct record of military service and all of his military education. The applicant contends his 31 March 1992 DD Form 214 should be corrected to show he entered AD on 5 October 1971, his correct net active service during this period, and all of his military education. Therefore, based on the evidence of record, there is no basis to correct item 12 (blocks a through e) of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110025037

    Original file (20110025037.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests the Commando Training United States Army Reserve (USAR), Primary Noncommissioned Officer Course (PNCOC), Expert Infantryman Badge (EIB), Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) and the Overseas Medal be added to his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Awards), states the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency, and fidelity during a qualifying period of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000189

    Original file (20100000189.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He also requests the separation program designator (SPD) code of "KGF" and the reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of RE-4 be removed from his DD Form 214. Paragraph 10-8 of Army Regulation 601-280 provides that a Soldier may appeal the bar to reenlistment imposed under the QMP based on improved performance and/or material error in the Soldier's record when reviewed by the selection board. This included persons being separated with a DA Bar to Reenlistment in effect.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019900

    Original file (20110019900.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show: * his rank/grade as specialist four (SP4)/E-4 * award of the Noncommissioned Officer Professional (NCO) Development Ribbon with Numeral 2 2. His records contain a DA Form 3947 (Medical Board Proceedings), dated 2 June 1983. Evidence shows his record went before a grade determination board.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | AR20140007822

    Original file (AR20140007822.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his rank as corporal (CPL) instead of specialist four (SP4). An acting NCO appointed under these provisions had all of the authority of a regularly appointed NCO of the same grade. c. Review of the regulation failed to reveal any provisions authorizing the "automatic" lateral transfer of an acting NCO by reason of time served as an acting NCO.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100001181

    Original file (20100001181.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the appropriate level of the Noncommissioned Officer Professional Development Ribbon (NCOPDR). Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides the NCOPDR was established by the Secretary of the Army on 10 April 1981. The applicant completed various levels of NCO professional development between 1967 and 1976 which qualified him for the NCOPDR, including: * the...