Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000189
Original file (20100000189.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	 5 August 2010 

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100000189 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with a separation date of 6 February 1989 be corrected to show he completed the Primary Noncommissioned Officers Course (PNCOC) and the Basic Noncommissioned Officer Course (BNCOC).
He also requests the separation program designator (SPD) code of "KGF" and the reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of RE-4 be removed from his DD Form 214.

2.  The applicant makes no additional statements in support of his application. 

3.  The applicant provides copies of his:

* certificate for completion of PNCOC
* certificate for completion of BNCOC
* DD Form 214

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military personnel records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 30 December 1976 for a period of 3 years.  

3.  The applicant was discharged 5 April 1979 and immediately reenlisted on 
6 April 1979.  Item 27 (Remarks) of his DD Form 214 contained the entry "Military Education:  None."

4.  The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he completed 3 weeks of PNCOC in 1978 and 4 weeks of BNCOC in 1982.   

5.  A memorandum, dated 14 October 1988, shows the applicant was notified the Calendar Year 1988 Master Sergeant/Sergeant Qualitative Management Program (QMP) Selection Board convened on 12 July 1988 and reviewed his Official Military Personnel File and, after a comprehensive review of his file, determined he was to be barred from reenlistment.  Five Enlisted Evaluation Reports were cited as identifying deficiency/weakness in competence, leadership, training, and responsibility and accountability as the basis for his bar to reenlistment.  In addition, three instances of nonjudicial punishment were cited as identifying areas of deficiency/weakness in personal values, responsibility and accountability, and competence.

6.  On 25 October 1988, the applicant indicated he would submit an appeal.  However, his appeal was not available for review.

7.  On 12 January 1989, the applicant requested separation.  The applicant's request for separation was approved and on 6 February 1989, he was discharged.  He had completed 9 years, 9 months, and 17 days of active service that was characterized as honorable.  He had 14 days of time lost.  Item 14 (Military Education) of his DD Form 214 does not show he completed BNCOC.  He was assigned the SPD code of "KGF" and an RE code of 4.

8.  The certificates submitted by the applicant show he attended and completed PNCOC from 8 September 1978 to 6 October 1978 and he completed BNCOC on 23 July 1982.

9.  Chapter 10 of Army Regulation 601-280 (Army Retention Program), then in effect, set forth policy and prescribed procedures for denying reenlistment under the QMP.  This program is based on the premise that reenlistment is a privilege for those whose performance, conduct, attitude, and potential for advancement meet Army standards.  It is designed to (1) enhance the quality of the career enlisted force, (2) selectively retain the best qualified Soldiers to 30 years of active duty, (3) deny reenlistment to non-progressive and nonproductive Soldiers, and (4) encourage Soldiers to maintain their eligibility for further service.  The QMP consists of two major subprograms, the qualitative retention subprogram and the qualitative screening subprogram.  Under the qualitative screening subprogram, records for grades E-5 through E-9 are regularly screened by the DA (Department of the Army) promotion selection boards.  The appropriate selection boards evaluate past performances and estimate the potential of each Soldier to determine if continued service is warranted.  Soldiers whose continued service is not warranted receive a QMP bar to reenlistment.

10.  Paragraph 10-8 of Army Regulation 601-280 provides that a Soldier may appeal the bar to reenlistment imposed under the QMP based on improved performance and/or material error in the Soldier's record when reviewed by the selection board.  The appeal must be submitted within 45 days of completion of the Statement of Option and will include substantive comments on the Soldier's performance and potential by each member of the chain of command.  Paragraph 10-10 provides that the appeal is considered by the Qualitative Management Program Appeals Board normally conducted in conjunction with Centralized Enlisted Selection Boards.  The Qualitative Management Program Appeals Board will consider the Soldier's potential for future service and promotion; review the Soldier's complete record "de novo"; and notify the Soldier's commander (lieutenant colonel or above) of the results of the appeal.

11.  Army Regulation 635-5-1 (SPD Codes), then in effect, prescribes the specific authorities (regulatory, statutory, or other directives), the reasons for the separation of members from active military service, and the SPD codes to be used for these stated reasons.  The regulation shows that the SPD code of "KGF" as shown on the applicant's DD Form 214 specifies the narrative reason for discharge as "HQDA (Headquarters, Department of the Army) imposed bar to reenlistment." 

12.  Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge.  Army Regulation 601-210 (Regular Army and Army Reserve Enlistment Program), then in effect, covered eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing into the Regular Army (RA) and the U.S. Army Reserve.  Chapter 3 of that regulation prescribed basic eligibility for prior service applicants for enlistment.  That chapter included a list of armed forces RE codes.  

13.  Table 3-6 of Army Regulation 601-210, then in effect, provided that RE-4 applied to persons separated from the last period of service with a non-waivable disqualification.  This included persons being separated with a DA Bar to Reenlistment in effect.

14.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), effective 20 August 1973, established the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  It stated that formal in-service (full-time attendance) training courses successfully completed during the period of service covered will be entered in Item 27 (Remarks).  

15.  Army Regulation 635-5, effective 1 October 1979, stated that formal in-service (full-time attendance) training courses successfully completed during the period of service covered will be entered in Item 14 (Military Education [Course title, number of weeks, and month and year completed]).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show he completed PNCOC and BNCOC.  He also contends his SPD code of "KGF" and RE code of 4 should be removed.

2.  The applicant completed both PNCOC and BNCOC.  Therefore, it is appropriate to enter these courses on the DD Form 214 covering the period during which the courses were completed.  In this case, he completed PNCOC during the period ending 5 April 1979 and he completed BNCOC during the period ending 6 February 1989.

3.  The applicant received a DA Bar to reenlistment on 14 October 1988.  Although he indicated he would appeal the bar, there is no evidence available concerning an appeal.  The applicant has provided no evidence or official documentation to show there was an error or injustice in the imposition of the DA Bar to Reenlistment.   Therefore, the SPD code of "KGF" and the RE code of 4 are correctly shown on his DD Form 214, ending on 6 February 1989.


BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

____x____  ____x____  _____x___  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending:

	a.  Item 27 of his DD Form 214 with a separation date of 5 April 1979 to include the entry:  Military Education:  Primary Noncommissioned Officers Course, 3 weeks, October 1978; and

   b.  Item 14 of his DD Form 214 with a separation date of 6 February 1989 to include the entry:  Basic Noncommissioned Officer Course, 4 weeks, July 1982.

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to his SPD code and RE code.  



      ____________x_____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100000189



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100000189



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9509703C070209

    Original file (9509703C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 18 April 1978, he enlisted in the Regular Army, in pay grade E-1, for 3 years. On 24 January 1992, the commander indicated that he had presented the notification of the DA bar to reenlistment, explained the available options, and counseled the applicant on his rights, the provisions of the Enlisted Qualitative Early Separation Program, and Army Regulation 635-200. Soldiers whose continued service is not warranted receive a QMP bar to reenlistment.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9507699C070209

    Original file (9507699C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: Correction of appropriate military records to show a reentry eligibility (RE) code which would allow reenlistment. The appropriate selection boards evaluate past performances and estimate the potential of each soldier to determine if continued service is warranted. Soldiers whose continued service is not warranted receive a QMP bar to reenlistment.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9609758C070209

    Original file (9609758C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was given a separation code of “KGH, and a reentry code of “3.” He had completed a total of 9 years, 1 month, and 26 days active military service, and 2 years, 8 months, and 21 days inactive military service. Soldiers whose continued service is not warranted receive a QMP bar to reenlistment. Based on the applicant’s selection of Option 2 when he was notified of the DA bar to reenlistment, he should have been involuntarily discharged under Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 16-8...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070003221

    Original file (20070003221.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    By memorandum dated 15 January 1992, the applicant was notified that the Calendar Year 1991 Sergeant First Class Promotion Board Qualitative Management Program (QMP) Selection Board reviewed his Official Military Personnel File and, after a comprehensive review of his file, determined he was to be barred from reenlistment. Evidence of record shows the applicant was involuntarily separated on 30 April 1992 under the QMP. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant’s separation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074503C070403

    Original file (2002074503C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 16, Paragraph 16-5a(1) provided the authority for soldiers who perceived that they would not be able to overcome an HQDA-Imposed Bar to Reenlistment to be discharged anytime after receipt of the HQDA bar to reenlistment or notification that the bar to reenlistment appeal had been disapproved. Pertinent Army regulations provide that before discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027601

    Original file (20100027601.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his reentry (RE) code on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 18 June 1993 be changed to a more favorable RE code. In a memorandum, dated 5 April 1993, he was notified that the Calendar Year 1993 Sergeant First Class Promotion Board Qualitative Management Program (QMP) Selection Board reviewed his Official Military Personnel File and after a comprehensive review of his file determined he was to be barred...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9511400C070209

    Original file (9511400C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show: He enlisted in the Regular Army on 11 May 1977 and was honorably discharged on 11 August 1989 in pay grade E-5 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 13 for unsatisfactory performance. On 14 October 1988 the applicant was informed that his records had been reviewed by a DA Qualitative Management Program (QMP) board and he had been barred from reenlistment. The appropriate selection boards evaluate past...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070006654

    Original file (20070006654.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 9 October 1992, the applicant was discharged under the provision of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 16-8 by reason of “Reduction in Authorized Strength – Qualitative Early Transition Program.” He was assigned a separation code of JCC and a reenlistment eligibility code of RE-4. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. He was barred from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001061185C070421

    Original file (2001061185C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: By memorandum dated 26 September 1995, the applicant was notified that he had been determined to be barred from reenlistment under the Department of the Army Qualitative Management Program (QMP). Army Regulation 635-5-1, SPD/Reentry Code Cross-Reference Table states that RE code 4 will be used when a soldier is discharged under the QMP.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010252

    Original file (20080010252.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 8 January 1987 he was honorably discharged in pay grade E-5. He was discharged, in pay grade E-5, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 16-8, which directed the early release of Soldiers with a QMP bar to reenlistment. Army Regulation 601-280 (Army Retention Program), chapter 10, sets forth policy and prescribes procedures for denying reenlistment under the QMP.