Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014295
Original file (20110014295.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  6 March 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110014295 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests reinstatement of her Critical Service Reenlistment Bonus (CSRB) in the amount of $20,000.00.

2.  The applicant states:

* she was not initially aware of how the Military Technician (MILTECH) position would affect her bonus
* she was not in the position to decline a job after 10 months of unemployment
* she was rated as a superior in her military occupational specialty (MOS) field
* she was and still is willing to deploy at any time
* she is willing to accept the recoupment of her bonus during the 6 months held as a MILTECH
* she continues to serve in the Army Reserve and would love to stay longer
* she still holds the critical MOS.  

3.  In a letter, dated 5 July 2011, she states:
 
	a.  in October 2008 she was granted a CSRB for MOS 92Y (unit supply specialist) in the amount of $20,000.00.  At that time she was an E-8 Reserve instructor with the 80th Training Command in Lodi, NJ for the 92Y course and a GS-11 civilian, program analyst at Fort Monmouth, NJ.  Her husband, a Department of the Army civilian, accepted a job in Germany and they moved.  In Germany, she was on leave without pay for 6 months while in search of another civilian position.  

   b.  she was offered a MILTECH position and started on 21 July 2010.  A month later, she noticed her Reserve pay was being garnished and she realized she had forfeited her bonus.  Although she knew she was in breach of her CSRB, she was not in the financial position to quit her job so she continued her search for a non MILTECH position.  In December 2009 she was offered a full-time Department of the Army civilian position and she accepted with a start date of 
18 January 2011.    

	c.  she requested an exception to policy for reinstatement of her CSRB but her request was disapproved.

	d.  she is requesting an exception to policy based on the following information:

		(1) the MILTECH bonus clause is severely outdated.  Soldiers deploy as MILTECHs all the time; she has seen it done for many years.  MILTECHs should have the same opportunities as all Reservists.

		(2) She was not in the financial position to decline a position.  She moved to a new location and was without a job for over 6 months.

		(3) She served in the MILTECH position for less than 6 months.  Upon realizing she was in breach of contract, she searched for another position.

		(4) She has served in the Army Reserve for 18 years of her 21 years total service.  She is a proud Soldier and continues to serve her country with honor.  She is and has always been considered an outstanding Soldier and leader of Soldiers.

		(5) At no time did she change her status from non-deployable. 

4.  The applicant provides:

* Memorandum, dated 1 April 2011, from her current unit commander
* Original exception to policy request, dated 21 March 2011
* Two Standard Form (SF) 50 (Notification of Personnel Action)
* Emails from the U.S. Army Reserve Command, G-1


 
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Having prior active service in the Regular Army, and inactive service in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) and Army National Guard, the applicant enlisted in the USAR on 15 May 1998 for a period of 6 years.  

2.  The applicant's service personnel records do not contain any subsequent enlistment/reenlistment documents/contracts.  

3.  She was promoted to master sergeant on 1 June 2009.
  
4.  She provided two SF 50s, dated 18 July 2010 and 16 January 2011, for civilian employment positions in Germany.     

5.  On 21 March 2011, she submitted a request for exception to policy for reinstatement of her CSRB.  She stated:

* In October 2008 she accepted a CSRB as a 92Y
* Her bonus was forfeited when she accepted a MILTECH position in July 2010
* At the time she accepted the position, she was unaware she would lose her bonus
* Upon discovering she would forfeit her bonus she searched and obtained a non MILTECH position
* She is no longer a MILTECH and she only accepted the position for less than 6 months
* She has continued to honor her Army Reserve obligation as a full-time Department of the Army civilian
* She would like to have her CSRB reinstated because she met all obligations of the bonus even while serving as a MILTECH
* She would like to continue to serve out the 3-year bonus obligation as required 

6.  On 31 May 2011, via email, she was informed by the Incentives Branch, USARC [U.S. Army Reserve Command], G-1 that:

* she forfeited her incentives when she accepted the MILTECH position
* that office has no authority to approve her request for exception to policy
* she was a master sergeant in the USAR and she should have read the contract


7.  In support of her claim, she provided a memorandum, dated 1 April 2011, from her current unit commander which states:

	a.  he requests her CSRB be reinstated under the terms of her original contract.

   b.  she is still serving in the Army Reserve as a current Troop Program Unit (TPU) Soldier assigned to his command.

	c.  she initially received her CSRB while assigned as a TPU Soldier with the 8/80th Training Division in Lodi, NJ in October 2008.  She transferred to this unit (7th Civil Service Command (CSC)) in July 2010 as a 92Y.  She then accepted a MILTECH position with the 7th CSC which lasted less than 6 months and has now converted back to a TPU position.  She is serving in her original MOS 92Y. 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends she reenlisted in the USAR in 2008 for a period of 
3 years for a CSRB (MOS 92Y) in the amount of $20,000.00.  

2.  Although her 2008 reenlistment contract is not available, it appears she forfeited her CSRB when she accepted the MILTECH position in July 2010 in Germany.

3.  She contends she knew she was in breach of her CSRB but she was not in the financial position to quit her job.  

4.  Her remaining contentions and the supporting documentation were carefully considered.  However, by her own admission she breached her 3-year bonus obligation.  As a result of the breach of the applicant's reenlistment contract, she forfeited the CSRB.  Therefore, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request. 

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X __  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _  X_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110014295





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110014295



5


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016796

    Original file (20100016796.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    b. Mr. RS responded on 12 June 2008 by telling the applicant it appeared that he was still eligible to receive the bonus and indicated that he needed to qualify in one of the two critical boxes. He sent a third message on 22 July 2009 indicating he denied the applicantÂ’s request for the CSRB because he never submitted a properly-executed written agreement, even after two reminders. The evidence of record shows that the applicant resigned from his position as a UA in order to mobilize and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019789

    Original file (20130019789.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, an exception to policy (ETP) to retain eligibility for the Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP) incentive written in her enlistment contract. The applicant states: * her enlistment contract outlined that the SLRP would be revoked if she took a new duty assignment as a technician or an Active Guard Reserve (AGR) position * the National Guard Bureau (NGB) published Education and Incentives Operational Message (EIOM) 13-003 to provide instructions for ETP...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022360

    Original file (20100022360.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 28 June 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100022360 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests payment of his critical skill retention bonus (CSRB). The applicant signed an agreement that promised him payment of a $20,000.00 bonus in exchange for serving in a critical AOC in a TPU.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014666

    Original file (20130014666.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The advisory official opines that while the applicant was eligible for the HPLRP and paid the incentives associated with the program, there is no evidence of a valid loan contract or agreement on file that constitutes erroneous payments of the HPLRP benefits. The evidence of record shows the applicant contracted for the HPLRP at the time she was accessed into the CAARNG and it is apparent that she relied on the SME at the time to complete the necessary documents to establish her eligibility...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120014632

    Original file (20120014632.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Section III (Payments) shows he: (1) enlisted for a $20,000.00 NPSEB; (2) would receive the first payment at the rate of 50 percent upon completion of initial active duty for training (IADT) and award of the MOS for which enlisted; and (3) would receive a second and final payment on the 36th month anniversary of his enlistment. The ARNG has corrected this omission in the bonus addendums currently in use; and d. due to the applicant's inexperience in both the ARNG and the MilTech system and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004060

    Original file (20130004060.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states as part of her enlistment contract, in the bonus addendum, she was entitled to receive a $20,000.00 bonus. An exception to policy (ETP) memorandum was approved on 6 September 2013 by the ARNG for the applicant to retain the $10,000.00 NPSEB offered at the time of her enlistment, but payment of the remaining $5,000.00 was not made due to her accepting a MilTech position on 5 September 2012. c. The anniversary payment for this bonus was scheduled for payment on 26 May...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027154

    Original file (20100027154.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In the processing of this case, on 20 May 2001, the NGB provided an advisory opinion recommending disapproval of the applicant's request for payment of a bonus. The advisory official notes the applicant initialed each section of Annex R to DA Form 4836 indicating she understood she would be terminated from bonus eligibility with recoupment if she accepted an AGR position prior to serving at least 6 months of her contract term. The applicant's enlistment extension bonus contract required...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003056

    Original file (20120003056.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show entitlement to a Critical Skills Retention Bonus (CSRB) in area of concentration (AOC) 13A (Field Artillery). (1) It shows: * eligible applicants were offered the CSRB under the Selected Reserve Incentive Program CSRB Guidance for Fiscal Year (FY) 2008 (effective 1 February 2008 through 1 March 2009) * according to the applicant and a witness, a CSRB Addendum was initiated and signed on 5 June 2008 * a search of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010820

    Original file (20110010820.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests the remission/cancellation of her debt due to recoupment of her reenlistment bonus. On 6 February 2010, the State Incentive Manager submitted request for an exception to policy regarding the termination and recoupment of the applicantÂ’s bonus. In the processing of this case a staff advisory opinion was obtained from the Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-1 which recommends that the applicant be granted relief.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009470

    Original file (20130009470.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provided three UMRs, dated 2 June 2010, 24 August 2010, and 16 July 2011, which show: a. MSG CJ also stated that the applicant must complete the attached counseling and, by 27 May 2012, be reassigned to a valid position that meets COE and grade requirements or be subject to involuntary transfer to another unit, to the IRR, or elect retirement. (i) As a COE (MILTECH 365th) and in order to meet the senior grade overstrength guidance, she took a reduction in rank from SGM/E-9 to...