Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022360
Original file (20100022360.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  28 June 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100022360 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests payment of his critical skill retention bonus (CSRB).

2.  The applicant states he received a CSRB in March 2008.  However, his unit, the 99th Regional Readiness Command (RRC), was deactivated in February 2010.  He was contacted by officials at the Pacific Command (PACOM) and he was offered a 92A (Quartermaster - General) position in the PACOM Deployment and Distribution Operations Center (PDDOC).  His bonus was then rescinded and his pay was garnished.  He feels the bonus should be reinstated because he is still serving his country in a critical skill area of concentration (AOC).  It is not his fault that the unit had deactivated.  His contract stipulated that a member would not voluntarily leave the unit; his transfer was not voluntary.  He complied with the requirements of the bonus.

3.  The applicant provides his Reserve Component (RC) Officer CSRB Written Agreement.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Having had prior enlisted service, the applicant was appointed as a U.S Army Reserve (USAR) commissioned officer in the rank of second lieutenant and he executed an oath of office on 11 May 2002.

2.  He entered active duty for training (ADT) on 28 September 2002 and he completed the Quartermaster Officer Basic Course.  He was released from ADT on 29 January 2003.
3.  He entered active duty on 11 July 2004 and he was promoted to first lieutenant on 11 June 2004.  He was honorably released from active duty on 10 July 2007.

4.  On 11 July 2007, he was assigned to the 90th RRC, North Little Rock, AR, in AOC 92A (Transportation and Services Officer).

5.  On 5 August 2008, he executed an RC Officer CSRB Written Agreement that promised him a $20,000.00 CSRB by agreeing to serve in an AOC designated as a critical skill for a period of 3 years.  He acknowledged that he understood if he was involuntarily transferred to another Selected Reserve (SELRES) unit within his component because of unit transition, his entitlement to bonus payment would continue.  The bonus would be terminated if he voluntarily did not complete the term of obligated service in the designated critical skill for which the bonus was paid.

6.  On 22 January 2010, he was voluntarily reassigned from his Troop Program Unit (TPU) to an Individual Mobilization Augmentee (IMA) unit, the U.S. Army Element, Headquarters, PACOM, Camp Smith, HI.

7.  During the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the U.S. Army Reserve Command (USARC), Deputy Chief of Staff, G-1.  The advisory official recommended disapproval of the applicant's request.  He stated the CSRB was authorized for officers serving in selected AOC specialties in an Army TPU.  Upon the applicant's election to transfer to the U.S. Army Element, Headquarters, PACOM, an IMA unit, his bonus was terminated as he was no longer serving in a TPU which is a critical element of his bonus criteria.  Had he transferred to another TPU due to the inactivation of the 90th RRC, he would have retained his eligibility for the bonus.

8.  On 24 May 2011, a copy of the advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for information and to allow him the opportunity to submit comments or a rebuttal.  He did not respond.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant signed an agreement that promised him payment of a $20,000.00 bonus in exchange for serving in a critical AOC in a TPU.  Service in the TPU is a critical element of the bonus criteria.   When his unit deactivated, he elected to transfer to an IMA unit.  Had he chosen to transfer to another TPU, he would have remained eligible for the bonus.  He did not do so.  As such, he should not be allowed to profit from an agreement that he did not fulfill.

2.  In view of the foregoing, the applicant's requested relief should be denied.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________X____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100022360



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100022360



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016351

    Original file (20130016351.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, approval of an exception to policy (ETP) allowing him to retain his Critical Skills Retention Bonus (CSRB). He provides: * self-authored memorandum, dated 30 August 2013 * Orders 317-1010, dated 12 November 2008 * Orders 216-1024, dated 4 August 2011 * Officer/Warrant Officer Written Agreement – Army Reserve Components (RC) CSRB * NGB memorandum, subject: Request for ETP for Officer CSRB (Applicant), dated 1 July 2013 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001812

    Original file (20110001812.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * Orders A-08-023279, dated 17 August 2010 * DA Form 67-9 (Officer Evaluation Report) * DFAS Military Leave and Earnings Statement * Orders 10-174-00029 (voluntary transfer to the IRR) * Officer Written Agreement – Army Reserve Components (RC) CSRB CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. f. Since the USAR Command policy provides discretion to the TPU commander in instances such as those of the applicant's, one officer may be transferred to the IRR while another in a different...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002953

    Original file (20140002953.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show entitlement to a $20,000 Critical Skills Retention Bonus (CSRB) in area of concentration (AOC) 21B (Engineer) (or AOC 92A (Quartermaster)). The applicant contends, in effect, that his records should be corrected to show entitlement to a $20,000 CSRB in AOC 21B or AOC 92A, or, in the alternative, waiver of his $20,000 CSRB debt. However, he states that he signed a 3-year contract as a QM officer and received a $20,000 CSRB as...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006765

    Original file (20120006765.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    b. Paragraph 6i states that officers who meet the qualification and who execute a 3-year CSRB contract and service agreement will be paid $20,000.00. c. The applicant signed a CSRB agreement with the Ohio ARNG on 2 November 2008 in critical AOC 19A. The issue is confusing because NGB says his agreement shows his bonus AOC as 19A and his command says his bonus AOC was 19B, but the CSRB contract does not list any AOC.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017840

    Original file (20130017840.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show entitlement to a Critical Skills Retention Bonus (CSRB) in area of concentration (AOC) 11A (Infantry) [or AOC 53A (Automation Officer)]. The applicant indicated that he was eligible for a CSRB and that he would complete 6 years of commissioned service on 8 March 2009; the applicant was advised that he did not have to wait until 8 March 2009 to complete the agreement; he was provided instructions to place his initials in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021496

    Original file (20140021496.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests an exception to policy (ETP) for payment of the remaining $10,000.00 of his Critical Skills Retention Bonus (CSRB) and relief from recoupment of the portion already paid. The applicant states: * he was in an eligible position and eligible for the CSRB in 2008 and the necessary documents were sent to his headquarters and he was paid the first half of the bonus * he inquired about the unpaid portion of the bonus years later and he was informed that a records review was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021245

    Original file (20120021245.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The exception to policy memorandum stated he: * had been issued a control number via Information Management and Reporting Center (iMARC) * executed a CSRB addendum for AOC 19A on 10 April 2008 * received the first installment of $10,000 on 15 May 2008 * the second installment was rejected because his AOC was not listed as a critical AOC on the NGB's approved list of AOCs that qualified for the bonus 21. The applicant's primary skill, 19A, was not a designated skill for the bonus and there...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004283

    Original file (20120004283.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he was granted the bonus and received the first installment of the of it in 2008. The applicant inquired about the second half of his bonus and was advised that there was no record of his CSRB agreement documentation. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing a completed the CSRB written agreement dated 5 August 2008 was properly filed in his records; and b. directing DFAS to pay...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002515

    Original file (20120002515.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Memorandum for Record, subject: Exception to Policy - CSRB, dated 8 June 2011, with command endorsements, dated 16 June, 26 August, and 10 November 2011, that recommend approval of the applicant's request based on the ABCMR decision that corrected his records to show he was promoted to CPT on 9 July 2009. b. U.S. Army Reserve Command (USARC), Fort Bragg, NC, memorandum, subject: Exception to Policy, dated 10 January 2012, that disapproved the applicant's request for CSRB based on the fact...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016518

    Original file (20130016518.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show entitlement to a critical skills retention bonus (CSRB). The disapproval was based on: * the applicant not serving in the AOC for which contracted, as he moved into an AOC 19C position within 4 months of signing the CSRB agreement * CSRB agreement containing different signature dates from the applicant and the service representative * contract/bonus addendum not showing the critical AOC in the space provided (memorandum from...