Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013869
Original file (20110013869.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	 

		BOARD DATE:	  24 January 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110013869 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was discharged by reason of physical disability.

2.  The applicant states he was discharged without the benefit of being medically reviewed by the military and he was hospitalized in a military mental institution the day before his discharge.  He goes on to state he immediately filed an application with the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and he was granted service-connection for a number of items.  He continues by stating he is currently 100% disabled for bi-polar disorder and that he was diagnosed with this condition while on active duty; therefore, he should have been processed through the Physical Disability Evaluation System (PDES).

3.  The applicant provides a copy of:

* his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty)
* a letter to the Physical Evaluation Board Liaison Office (PEBLO) from the Chief, Orofacial Pain Clinic, Walter Reed Army Medical Center (WRAMC)
* medical treatment records
* his application for VA compensation

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error 


or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's complete military records are not available for review.  However, there were sufficient documents remaining in a reconstructed record to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case.

3.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 19 September 1990.  He completed training and he remained on active duty through a series of reenlistments.  He was promoted to the pay grade of E-5 on 1 February 1996.

4.  On 12 August 1996, while stationed at the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (WRAIR) as an automated logistics noncommissioned officer (NCO), he received permanent change of station (PCS) instructions for an overseas assignment which required him to extend his enlistment in order to meet the service remaining requirements.  The applicant elected to sign a Declination of Continued Service Statement (DCSS), which amounted to a self-imposed bar to reenlistment.  His expiration of term of service (ETS) date at that time was
11 May 1998.

5.  The facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s administrative separation are not present in the available records.  However, the applicant's
DD Form 214 shows he was honorably released from active duty on 1 January 1997 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 16-5b, by reason of non-retention on active duty.

6.  The medical documents submitted by the applicant show he was admitted to WRAMC in May and November 1996 for depression and suicidal ideation following an altercation with his wife.  There is no indication in those records to show that he was deemed unfit for retention or separation.

7.  Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), paragraph 16-5b, in effect at the time, provided that Soldiers who decline to meet service remaining requirements and who have signed a DCSS may request immediate separation.  The Soldier’s request will be submitted on a DA


Form 4187 (Personnel Action).  Separation under this paragraph will be accomplished as soon as practicable, but not later than 6 months from the date of approval of the request, notwithstanding any existing service obligation that cannot be fulfilled by the separation date.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  In the absence of evidence to the contrary, it must be presumed that the applicant voluntarily requested separation due to his election of signing a DCSS in lieu of reenlisting or extending to meet the time in service remaining requirement for a PCS move.

2.  The applicant’s contentions and supporting documents have been noted; however, they are not sufficient in themselves to overcome the presumption that he was deemed fit for separation at the time of his separation.

3.  Therefore, in the absence of such evidence there appears to be no basis to grant his request for a medical discharge 15 years after the fact.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X___  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   X_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110013869



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110013869



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018706

    Original file (20130018706.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). His DD Form 214 shows he retired by reason of disability. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show his rank and grade and date of rank as PFC, E-3, and 7 December 1971 respectively.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130002449

    Original file (AR20130002449.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 214 indicates that on 17 December 2006, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 19-12, AR 635-200, for non-retention on active duty, with a characterization of service of honorable. Declination of continued service; RA Soldiers serving on a second or subsequent enlistment who refuse to take action to meet military service remaining requirements by signing DA Form 4991–R pursuant to AR 601–280 may request voluntary separation. There is sufficient evidence...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000403

    Original file (20140000403.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 1 October 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140000403 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Counsel states the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) decision letter stated the applicant's physical and mental conditions at the time of discharge are unclear. As soon as he returned, his wife left him with two children to look after.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090561C070212

    Original file (2003090561C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The documents placing the applicant’s name on the TDRL, including Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) Proceedings (Department of the Army Form 3947) were executed at the United States Army Physical Disability Agency located at Walter Reed Army Medical Center. The Physical Evaluation Board (PEB), convened at Walter Reed Army Medical Center, and noted that the applicant had sustained a “sucking” chest wound while on patrol “when ambushed by suspected Taliban fighters.” They noted the applicant’s...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000471

    Original file (20120000471.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    National Guard Regulation 600-200 states Soldiers separated with RE code "3" are not fully qualified for reentry or continuous service at time of separation, but this disqualification is waivable. The available records do not show evidence of error in the RE code entered on the applicant's DD Form 214 for the period ending 19 June 1992. The available records do not show the SPD code assigned to Soldiers discharged based on a DCSS at the time.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013401

    Original file (20090013401.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicable regulation, in effect at the time, provided that the DD Form 214 would show the Soldier's rank and pay grade as they were at the time of separation. There is no evidence in the applicant‘s records and the applicant did not provide any substantiating evidence that shows he was advanced to SPC/E-4 prior to his temporary disability retirement. Since advancement/promotion of enlisted personnel were announced in DA Forms 4187 (Personnel Action) in effect at the time, in the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004965

    Original file (20090004965.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20070014535, dated 14 February 2008. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. The applicant has not submitted any evidence to show that he was mentally incompetent when he requested discharge...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019481

    Original file (20090019481.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show in block 12b that she was released from active duty (REFRAD) on 8 September 2009 instead of 29 July 2009 as currently reflected on that form. On 29 July 2009, A DD Form 214 was issued at WRAMC Transition Center that released her from active duty training. The evidence submitted by the applicant clearly shows that she was REFRAD on 8 September 2009 and therefore is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009492

    Original file (20100009492.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides the following documents: * a copy of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 26 February 1968 * a copy of Special Orders Number 13, dated 16 January 1968 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. (2) If the grade at the time of separation is not permanent, the permanent grade, date of appointment, and date of rank, if different from date of appointment will be entered in item 30. c. Item 30 is used to complete entries too long for their respective blocks and/or as a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009537

    Original file (20090009537.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). These orders also show the applicant had completed 16 years, 3 months, and 7 days of creditable service for disability retirement under Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1405, and 18 years, 2 months, and 18 days of creditable service for basic pay. This document further shows the applicant placed his signature on the DA Form 199 on 21 March 2001.