Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011335
Original file (20110011335.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		

		BOARD DATE:	  1 December 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110011335 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB).

2.  The applicant states:

	a.  his DD Form 214 does not show the CIB;

	b.  the details of his military service in Vietnam indicating the equipment he received at that time, his units of assignment, other Soldiers with whom he served, and his active participation in combat in Vietnam;

	c.  the Army made the mistake and should be able to provide the information necessary for his award of the CIB; however, he sees the Army has done him a disservice again, 42 years after his discharge, requiring him to prove he earned this award;

	d.  perhaps he did not reference the CIB was omitted from his DD Form 214 upon his discharge because he wanted to distance himself from the Army like you would not believe because, unlike other Soldiers from other conflicts who received "fanfare" upon their return, the Soldiers of the Vietnam Era were instead called baby killers; and

	e.  it is a mistake the CIB is not included on his DD Form 214 because he is a recipient of this award and wants to be able to prove it.

3.  The applicant provides a self-authored statement and a witness statement.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 15 January 1968.  He was trained in and awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman).

3.  The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in Vietnam from 10 June 1968 to 5 June 1969.  Item 38 (Record of Assignments) shows that during his RVN tour he was assigned to Company D, 4th Battalion, 3rd Infantry Regiment, 11th Infantry Brigade, performing the duties of a light weapons infantryman.  Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) does not include the CIB.

4.  The applicant's official military personnel file (OMPF) is void of any orders or documents that indicate he was ever recommended for or awarded the CIB while serving in Vietnam or at any other time during his military service.

5.  On 14 January 1970, the applicant was honorably released from active duty at the expiration of his term of service in the rank/grade of specialist four (SP4)/E-4. He completed 3 years of total active service.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 does not include the CIB among the awards listed.

6.  The applicant provides a witness statement who indicates:

* he served with the applicant from June 1968 to June 1969
* the applicant was a part of his fire team and became the squad leader
* the applicant served by his side during a number of fire fights and ambushes

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) contains the Army's awards policy.  Chapter 8 of the awards regulation contains guidance on badges and tabs of U.S. origin.  Paragraph 8-6 contains guidance on the CIB criteria and requires that the member was an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties; that he was assigned to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size during such time as the unit was engaged in active ground combat; and that he was present with his qualifying infantry unit and actively participated in such ground combat.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show the CIB.

2.  The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant was awarded an infantryman MOS and he was assigned to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size while assigned in the Republic of Vietnam.  However, it does not sufficiently show that he ever engaged in active ground combat with his infantry unit.

3.  The writer of the witness statement states the applicant had served in combat; however, this document in itself is insufficient justification for award of the CIB.

4.  In view of the above, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X___  ___X___  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _  X _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110011335



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110011335



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008114

    Original file (20080008114.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that while serving in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) he was assigned to a unit as an infantryman and performed the duties of an infantryman. There are no orders in his official record showing he was awarded the CIB. The evidence in the official record shows the applicant held MOS 94B and performed duties as a cook while in the RVN.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006782

    Original file (20080006782.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    During its original review of the case, the Board found no evidence of record that showed the applicant served in active ground combat while an assigned member of an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size, and as a result, concluded there was insufficient evidence to support award of the CIB. Further, the evidence provided by the applicant places him with his qualifying infantry unit while it was engaged in active ground combat with enemy forces in the RVN. As a result, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026236

    Original file (20100026236.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the CIB is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry MOS. ____________X____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007265

    Original file (20080007265.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record shows that the applicant served in the Republic of Vietnam from 2 September 1967 to 17 July 1968 and was assigned to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size (Company C, 1st Battalion, 5th Infantry); however, he held a vehicle mechanic MOS. The evidence of record also shows that the applicant completed another period of service in the Republic of Vietnam as an infantryman from 4 June 1970 to 18 September 1970 (when he departed on leave), and was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070016540

    Original file (20070016540.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no orders or other evidence in the applicant’s military service records that show he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge. The applicant contends, in effect, that his request for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge should be reconsidered because he held MOS 11B as his secondary MOS, served in duty MOS 11B, and also served in combat situations during his second tour in the RVN. There are no orders or other evidence to show the applicant was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022568

    Original file (20110022568.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). His records do not contain orders awarding him the CIB. In the absence of official orders or other documentary evidence such as operation reports, after action reports, valor awards, witness statements, or any other evidence that conclusively shows he actively participated in ground combat while assigned to an infantry...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004912

    Original file (20120004912.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he should have been awarded the CIB based his combat action in Vietnam and his military occupational specialty (MOS). However, there is no evidence of record that shows he served in active ground combat. ___________X______________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002760

    Original file (20130002760.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests: a. award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and "Wings" (correctly known as the Aircraft Crew Member Badge during the Vietnam era and currently known as the Aviation Badge); and b. the issuance of the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal and Vietnam Service Medal. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided for temporary and permanent award of the Aircraft Crew Member Badge. There is no evidence of record which shows he served in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080004859

    Original file (20080004859.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides for award of the CIB. In the absence of evidence that he was an infantryman actively participating in ground combat while assigned to an infantry unit, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the CIB in this case. XXX ______________________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001048

    Original file (20130001048.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board referred to Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) stating that "the CIB is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry military occupational specialty (MOS). As documented in his award of the Bronze Star Medal, in September, 1970, he was given the title of "Light Weapons Infantry Advisor" assigned to the 4th Battalion, 1st Infantry Regiment, 1st Infantry Division, Army of the Republic of Vietnam (ARVN). Army Regulation...