Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010812
Original file (20110010812.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  15 November 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110010812 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests reconsideration of his request for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB).

2.  He states it was his understanding that his service records would be reviewed and sufficient evidence could be gleaned from his records.  He adds that his records would show his locations and assignments in Vietnam.  He offers that these service records should be cross-referenced with the after-action reports and situation reports in the U.S. Government records in which the Board could access.  He states that these records will support his claim. 

3.  He provides the following:

* Self-authored statement 
* Headquarters, 3rd Brigade, 82nd Airborne Division, Operational Report, dated 12 May 1968
* Self-authored statement to the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), dated 29 August 2009 
* History of the 3rd Brigade
* Six letters to his spouse
* "Vet Center Intake"





CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20100019061, on 25 January 2011.

2.  The applicant’s evidence is all new and warrants Board consideration. 

3.  As stated in the previous case, the applicant was awarded and served in military occupational specialty 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman).  He served in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) from 14 February 1968 to 1 November 1968 and was assigned to the 3rd Brigade, 82nd Airborne Division.

4.  The applicant's self-authored statement to the VA and his letters to his spouse describe his service with the 82nd Airborne during his service in the RVN.  In his statement and his letters he relayed his encounters with sniper fire, mortar attacks, and rocket fire in an effort to show that he "engaged in active ground combat."  In one letter he said that "I called in for artillery and they fired to the area that we gave them on the map after that it was quiet till day break.  They sent out a patrol to the area where I called in the artillery and they found thirteen dead V.C. (Viet Cong).  That got me scared because there were probably more and they just missed our bunker."  Additionally, the envelopes containing the letters are postmarked February, March, April, June, and August 1968.  This information was not previously considered by the Board.

5.  He also provides the "History of the 3rd Brigade" during World War II and Vietnam.  

6.  The Operational Report of 3rd Brigade, dated 12 May 1968, provided the significant unit activities.  This report stated that the division deployed to a combat area on 12 February 1968 in the RVN.  It further stated that from 9 March 1968, the entire brigade was involved in combat operations.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states there are basically three requirements for award of the CIB.  The Soldier must be an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties, he must be assigned to an infantry unit of brigade or smaller size during such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat, and he must actively participate in such ground combat.


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The letters addressed to his spouse describing his encounters with the enemy as well as the operational report are sufficient evidence to conclude that he "personally served in active ground combat."  Therefore, in the interest of equity and justice, it would be appropriate to award him the CIB and correct his records to show this award.

BOARD VOTE:

____X____  ____X____  ____X____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant amendment of the ABCMR’s decision in Docket Number AR20100019061, dated 25 January 2011.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the Combat Infantryman Badge and adding it to his DD Form 214.



      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110010812





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110010812



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015687

    Original file (20080015687.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of this same document had an entry which showed that he was awarded the CIB, but this entry, which did not contain an authority for awarding the CIB, was also struck through. There is no evidence that he performed duties in MOS 11 on his DA Form 20. Further, although he provides pictures from his service in the RVN, these pictures do not conclusively show that he was performing infantryman duties or that he was actively engaged in combat against the enemy.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014108

    Original file (20100014108.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of: * Purple Heart * Meritorious Service Medal (MSM) * Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) 2. Additionally, there is no evidence in the available record which shows the applicant was either recommended for or awarded the CIB. Although the evidence of record shows the applicant served in an infantry MOS during his tour of duty in the RVN, his record...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009593

    Original file (20080009593.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no orders in the applicant’s military service records that show he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge and his DA Form 20 does not list the Combat Infantryman Badge in Item 41 (Awards and Decorations). There are also no orders or other evidence to show the applicant was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge. Thus, the evidence of record fails to show that the applicant served as an infantryman who satisfactorily performed infantry duties, that he was assigned or attached to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015287

    Original file (20090015287.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows the applicant served in the RVN from 27 July 1967 to 4 June 1968. His DD Form 214 only reflects one overseas service bar; therefore, his records should be corrected accordingly. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal and one overseas service bar; b. adding to item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Army Good Conduct Medal...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004100

    Original file (20130004100.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides copies of: * His DD Form 214 * Orders from the U.S. Army Reserve dated 21 March 1973 * Orders assigning him to the 121st Aviation Company, dated 4 June 1968 * DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) * A 10-page self-authored letter * Information on Pathfinders * A picture of himself as a Pathfinder in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of his DA Form 20 does not show he was awarded the CIB. He also provides...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018778

    Original file (20100018778.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The evidence shows the applicant served in an infantry MOS in a qualifying infantry unit for a short period; however, it also shows he served as a scout observer and switchboard operator, neither of which is listed as a position authorizing award of the CIB in the RVN. ____________X_____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060009524

    Original file (20060009524.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 6 February 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060009524 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Army Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) and the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). The applicant was subsequently separated from the service and requested that he be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015148

    Original file (20140015148.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that he be awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). Additionally, Appendix V of U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) states that during the Vietnam era the CIB was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11D, 11F, 11G, or 11H. _______ _ _x______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063665C070421

    Original file (2001063665C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: Although his DA Form 20 shows that he was assigned infantry duties (MOS 11B) with the "Phu Loi Patrol" from 15 December 1969 to 12 February 1970, there is nothing in the applicant's records to show that he was ever in combat or was ever awarded a CIB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010106

    Original file (20100010106.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards) provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. There is no evidence in the available records to show that the applicant should be awarded the CIB. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (first award) for the period 25 October 1966 through...