Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009748
Original file (20110009748.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  6 December 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110009748 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he was authorized the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal and that he was an M60 machine gunner.

2.  He states he served 18 months of duty in the northeast province of Thailand while drawing hazardous duty pay.  He adds that they were told by their commanding officer that they would be awarded the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal.  He states he served with the 442d Signal Battalion and was an M60 machine gunner.   

3.  He provides his DD Form 214 and DD Form 256A (Honorable Discharge). 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  The applicant's military records show that he enlisted in the Regular Army on 14 November 1967.  He completed training, was awarded the military occupational specialty of 31M (radio relay and carrier operator), and was promoted to pay grade E-4.

3.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served as a radio relay and carrier operator in Thailand while he was assigned to the 55th Signal Company from 8 June through 3 November 1968 and the 379th Signal Battalion (attached to Company B, 442d Signal Battalion) from 4 November 1968 to 27 November 1969.

4.  His DA Form 20 lists award of the Vietnam Service Medal and Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal.  However, both of these entries are lined through.  There is no evidence of record showing he served as an M60 machine gunner.

5.  On 15 September 1970, he was honorably released from active duty.

6.  There is no evidence of record which shows his units served in direct support of operations in Vietnam.

7.  There is no evidence of record which shows he served in Vietnam.

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides for award of the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal.  This medal was awarded by the Government of Vietnam to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam during the period 1 March 1961 through 28 March 1973.  Qualifying service included assignment in Vietnam for 6 months during this period.  Qualifying service outside the geographical limits of the Republic of Vietnam required the individual to provide direct combat support to the Republic of Vietnam and Armed Forces for 6 months and meet the criteria established for the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (Vietnam) or the Vietnam Service Medal.

9.  Direct support is defined in Army Regulation 600-8-22 as services being supplied to combat forces in the area of eligibility by ground units, ships, and aircraft providing supplies and equipment to the forces concerned, provided it involves actually entering the designated area; and ships and aircraft providing fire, patrol, guard, reconnaissance, or other military support.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Evidence of record shows the applicant served as a radio relay and carrier operator during his tour in Thailand.  
2.  His commanding officer may have mistakenly told his Soldiers that they were eligible for the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal.  However, "direct support" is defined as services being supplied to combat forces in the area of eligibility by ground units, ships, and aircraft providing supplies and equipment to the forces concerned, provided it involves actually entering the designated area.  The applicant has provided no evidence that shows he entered an area of eligibility. 

3.  There is no evidence of record and the applicant has provided no evidence which shows he served a period of qualifying service in Vietnam or that while serving in Thailand he served in direct support of operations in Vietnam.  Therefore, there is insufficient evidence on which to base adding the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal to his DD Form 214.

4.  There is no evidence he served as an M60 machine gunner.  In any case, duty positions are not entered on the DD Form 214.

5.  In view of the foregoing, there is an insufficient basis for granting the applicant's request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ____x___  ____x___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   _x______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110009748



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110009748



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001667

    Original file (20150001667.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The other part of his tour was served at Warin, Thailand, operating the AN/TRC 24 station from Ubon AFB to Site Warin. He has made inquiries to people who were stationed at the same locations in the 442nd Signal Battalion, at/or about the same time period, via a Facebook Group "All Thailand, Laos, Cambodia Signal Sites," if they had been issued these awards. Another individual requested reconsideration of an earlier request for award of the Vietnam Service Medal and Vietnam Campaign Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000480

    Original file (20140000480.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). He provides: * self-authored statement * a copy of the original ABCMR proceedings with his notification letter * Army Regulation 600-8-22 document extract * DD Form 214 * DD Form 215 (Correction to the DD Form 214) * Communications-Electronics 1962 – 1970 E-Book internet document extract * Wikipedia internet document titled "United States Air Force in Thailand" * TLC Brotherhood internet document *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013502

    Original file (20130013502.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Vietnam Service Medal is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973. There is no evidence of record and the applicant provided no evidence to show he served in Vietnam. _______ _ X ______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005279

    Original file (20120005279.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence of record which shows the applicant's unit served in direct support of operations in Vietnam. Members in Thailand, Laos, or Cambodia during the same period and serving in direct support of operations in Vietnam are also eligible for the Vietnam Service Medal. There is no evidence of record and the applicant has provided no evidence which shows that while serving in Thailand he served in direct support of operations in Vietnam as defined by the awards regulation.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027156

    Original file (20100027156.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he served with the 809th Engineer Battalion in Thailand from 1965 to 1966 and this qualifies him for award of the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal. There is no evidence, and he did not provide any evidence, that shows he provided direct combat support to the combat forces in Vietnam during his assignment in Thailand. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence in which to base award of the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002231

    Original file (20140002231.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Army Good Conduct Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, and Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960). His records are void of evidence and he did not provide any evidence which indicates he ever served in the Republic of Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120012192

    Original file (20120012192.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), Republic of Vietnam (RVN) Campaign Medal with Device (1960), and any other awards he may be entitled to. The evidence of record does not support the applicant's request for correction of his record to show the VSM, RVN Campaign...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017801

    Original file (20100017801.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal for his service during the Vietnam Conflict and its addition to his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty), dated 14 September 1976. The evidence of records does not show the applicant met the criteria for award of the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal for his period of service in Thailand. _______ _ x_______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005224

    Original file (20140005224.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). He has not provided sufficient evidence and his record does not contain any evidence that the 207th Signal Company (TROPO) provided direct support as defined in Army Regulation 600-8-22, to units serving in Vietnam. _____________X_________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001373

    Original file (20090001373.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. The applicant's records do not contain his flight record and/or orders awarding him the Bronze Star Medal. The regulation authorized the commander of any unit with Army aircraft assigned to publish orders allowing qualified members of that command to wear the Aircraft Crew Member Badge.