Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009525
Original file (20110009525.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		

		BOARD DATE:	  10 November 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110009525 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, his military records be corrected to show he completed 20 years of service for a Reserve Component retirement.

2.  The applicant states:

* He fully served his country for 20 years
* He was sent home from the hospital after three operations caused by a military accident
* While on convalescent leave he was notified by mail that he was released from duty
* He was not allowed to complete 20 years
* He was given severance pay

3.  The applicant provides a memorandum, dated 1 April 2011, from the Texas Army National Guard (TXARNG).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  Having prior active service in the Regular Army, the applicant enlisted in the TXARNG on 23 October 1974.  On 7 December 1990, he was ordered to active duty in support of Operation Desert Shield/Storm. 

3.  On 2 May 1991, a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) diagnosed the applicant with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), chronic dermatitis, and a right eye condition.  The MEB recommended referral to a Physical Evaluation Board (PEB).     

4.  On 16 May 1991, an informal PEB found the applicant physically unfit due to PTSD.  The PEB recommended his separation from the Army with severance pay (10 percent).  On 16 July 1991, he concurred with the findings and waived a formal hearing.  

5.  On 23 August 1991, the U.S. Army Physical Disability Agency approved the PEB’s findings and recommendation.

6.  He was honorably discharged from active duty on 12 September 1991 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-40, paragraph 4-24b(3), for physical disability with severance pay.  

7.  He was honorably discharged from the TXARNG on 12 September 1991 under the provisions of National Guard Regulation 600-200, paragraph 8-26y, for being medically unfit for retention standards.

8.  His ARNG Retirement Points History Statement, prepared on 18 November 1991, shows he had 19 years, 10 months, and 18 days of qualifying service for retired pay.

9.  Paragraph 1-4(a) (Retired pay) of Army Regulation 135-180 (Qualifying Service for Retired Pay Nonregular Service) states that retired pay is pay granted Soldiers and former Reserve Components Soldiers under Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1331 (at the time), after completion of 20 or more years of qualifying service and upon attaining age 60.  



10.  Sections 12731 through 12740 of Title 10, U. S. Code, currently authorize retired pay for Reserve Component military service.  Under this law, a Reserve Soldier must complete a minimum of 20 qualifying years of service to be eligible for retired pay at age 60.   

11.  Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation) governs the evaluation of physical fitness of Soldiers who may be unfit to perform their military duties because of physical disability.  The regulation states a Soldier may not be retained or separated solely to increase retirement or separation benefits.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Evidence shows the applicant concurred with the PEB findings and recommendation for his separation with severance pay on 16 July 1991.

2.  Evidence shows he completed 19 years, 10 months, and 18 days of creditable service for non-regular retirement at age 60.

3.  Although he contends he was not allowed to complete 20 years, the governing regulation states a Soldier may not be retained to increase retirement benefits.  

4.  By law, a Reserve Soldier must complete a minimum of 20 qualifying years of service to be eligible for retired pay.  Since the applicant did not complete 
20 qualifying years of service, there is no basis for granting the applicant’s request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

_X____  _X_______  _____X___  DENY APPLICATION






BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   X_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110009525





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110009525



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022670

    Original file (20120022670.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his record to show he completed 20 years of service qualifying for retired pay. The available evidence shows no basis for correcting the applicant's record to show he completed 20 years of qualifying service for retired pay. The available records show no basis for correcting his record to show he was retired from the TXARNG for disability.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008770

    Original file (20120008770.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The MEB proceedings do not show a recommendation or any other entries by Army officials; f. a DA Form 199 (PEB Proceedings) that shows a PEB convened on 17 April 2007 to evaluate the applicant's type II diabetes, well controlled on oral agents: (1) the board found the applicant fit for duty and returned him to duty, and (2) the applicant concurred with the PEB findings and recommendations on 19 April 2007; g. a VA Rating Decision, dated 3 May 2008, that shows the following decisions were...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023999

    Original file (20100023999.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The advisory official stated: a. in consultation with the Surgeon's Office, the medical evidence shows the applicant should have been administratively discharged in June 1996 instead of being allowed to remain the ARNG until he was transferred to the Retired Reserve in March 2003. b. the applicant's 1996 physical identified a medically disqualifying disease and the medication prescribed to treat it in Army Regulation 40-501, chapter 3. A retention physical was performed in 2001 and his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015617

    Original file (20140015617.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show in: * item 4a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) – lieutenant colonel (LTC) instead of major (MAJ) * item 4b (Pay Grade) – O-5 instead of O-4 * item 12b (Separation Date this Period) – 18 March 1996 instead of 17 April 1991 * item 12h (Effective Date of Pay Grade) – 29 June 1995 instead of 29 June 1989 * item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 03093401C070212

    Original file (03093401C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 40-3, chapter 7, provides for MEBs, and are convened to document a service member’s medical status and duty limitations insofar as duty is affected by the member’s medical status. Consequently, the applicant's records should be corrected to show that he transferred to the Army Reserve Control Group (Retired) effective on 3 November 1995, and that he is entitled to retirement pay at age 60 under the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, section 12731a. As a result, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080004767

    Original file (20080004767.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He now requests that his records be corrected to show that his request for COAR status was approved and that he obtained his 20 qualifying years for non-regular retirement. The available evidence confirms that in conjunction with the PEB finding of unfitness, the applicant requested COAR status to complete 20 years of qualifying service for non-regular retired pay, and that the USAPDA supported this request. Accordingly, it would be appropriate and serve the interests of equity and justice...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006232

    Original file (20090006232.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 635-40 provides for the evaluation for physical fitness of Soldiers who may be unfit to perform the military duties of his or her office, grade, rank, or rating because of a physical disability. Army Regulation 635-40 requires that when a Soldier has a rating of less than 30 percent and has at least 20 qualifying years for retirement for non-regular service the DA Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board [PEB] Proceedings) should have the entry: "You have the option of accepting...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006307

    Original file (20090006307.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was medically retired or separated for disability with entitlement to severance pay instead of honorably discharged. Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation) establishes the Army PDES and sets forth policies, responsibilities, and procedures that apply in determining whether a Soldier is unfit because of physical disability to reasonably perform the duties of his or her office, grade,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003035C070206

    Original file (20050003035C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that he be reinstated, promoted to the appropriate rank, paid all back pay and allowances due him, and that he be retired from the Texas Army National Guard (TXARNG). A National Guard Bureau Equal Opportunity Investigation, date of completion unknown, found that the applicant had been discriminated against and was a victim of mismanagement and therefore recommended he be reinstated in the TXARNG retroactively to the date of his separation (14 September 1991) and that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 03093058C070212

    Original file (03093058C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's personnel qualification record indicates that he was released from active duty on 19 December 1991 and returned to the Delaware Army National Guard per a First United States Army order dated on 4 December 1991. That record also shows that he was discharged on 20 December 1991. The DD Form 214 shows that the applicant was discharged with severance pay.