Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110007831
Original file (20110007831.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  9 August 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110007831 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC) for injuries that occurred during a rappelling training mission.

2.  He states:

* he was injured during an Army training mission in December 1963
* he fractured his third metatarsal [bones of the foot] and the distal shaft of the same metatarsal
* the injury is documented in his military medical records

3.  He provides:

* CRSC denial letter from the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, Fort Knox, KY, dated 22 February 2011
* Standard Form 513 (Clinical Record – Consultation Sheet)
* three pages of a Standard Form 600 (Health Record – Chronological Record of Medical Care)
* Standard Form 519 (Clinical Record – Radiographic Report)
* witness statement

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is a retired Regular Army first sergeant who was initially inducted into the Army of the United States on 4 December 1956.

2.  He was honorably retired on 31 December 1976 and placed on the Retired List in the rank/grade of 1SG/E-8 on 1 January 1977.  His DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) shows he completed 20 years and 27 days of creditable active service.

3.  He submitted a Standard Form 513 which shows he was diagnosed with a fractured base and head of his third metatarsal on 23 December 1963.

4.  He submitted a partially legible copy of a Standard Form 600, dated 30 December 1963, which shows he would be able to perform the present mission following removal of his cast and evaluation of his fracture.

5.  He submitted a copy of a Standard Form 519-B, dated 23 December 1963, which shows he had a fracture of the base of the third metatarsal in good position and an additional facture of the distal shaft of the same metatarsal.

6.  He submitted an unnotarized witness statement from a retired lieutenant colonel, dated 16 June 2010, who states the applicant broke his third metatarsal of his left foot when he hit the ground at a high rate of speed while rappelling on 23 December 1963.

7.  On 22 February 2011, the CRSC Branch determined the applicant's arteriosclerotic heart disease, degenerative disc disease/degenerative, and fracture of his left metatarsal bones were not combat-related and denied his request for CRSC.

8.  CRSC, as established by Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1413a, as amended, states that eligible members are retired veterans with combat-related injuries who meet all of the following criteria:

* Active, Reserve or National Guard with 20 years of creditable service, or permanent medical retiree, or Temporary Early Retirement Authority retiree
* receiving military retired pay
* have 10 percent or greater Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rated injury
* military retired pay is reduced by VA disability payments (VA Waiver)

and who are able to provide documentary evidence that their injury was a result of one of the following:

* training that simulates war (e.g., exercises, field training)
* hazardous duty (e.g., flight, diving, parachute duty)
* an instrumentality of war (e.g., combat vehicles, weapons, Agent Orange)
* armed conflict (e.g., gunshot wounds (Purple Heart), punji stick injuries)

9.  The Under Secretary of Defense for Military Personnel Policy provided policy guidance on the processing of CRSC appeals.  In guidance it was stated that in order for a condition to be considered combat-related there must be evidence of the condition having a direct, causal relationship to war or the simulation of war.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant submitted documentation showing he was treated for disabilities that he contends are combat-related.  The documents submitted by the applicant show he has service-connected conditions.  He states he fractured his left metatarsal during a rappelling training mission.  There is not evidence of record to show that his medical condition was the result of a combat-related event.

2.  As stated above, the CRSC criteria are specifically for those military retirees who have combat-related disabilities.  Incurring disabilities while in a theater of operations or in training exercises is not, in and of itself, sufficient to grant a military retiree CRSC.  The military retiree must show the disability was incurred while engaged in combat, while performing duties simulating combat conditions, or while performing especially hazardous duties such as parachuting or scuba diving.  The applicant failed to provide documentation to show he meets this requirement.

3.  Although the witness statement attests to his injuries almost 50 years after the fact, it is insufficient since there is no other corroborating evidence, such as a line of duty determination, that shows the fracture the result of a combat-related training event.  As a result, it is also insufficient establishing a direct, causal relationship to the VA-rated disabilities to war or the simulation of war.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ____X___  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ____________X_____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110007831



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100001026

    Original file (20100001026.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). CRSC, as established by Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1413a, as amended, states that eligible members are retired veterans with combat-related injuries who meet all of the following criteria: * Active, Reserve, or National Guard with 20 years of creditable service, or permanent medical retiree, or Temporary Early Retirement Authority retiree * receiving military retired pay * have 10 percent or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011027

    Original file (20110011027.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his record to show entitlement to Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC). While the applicant's medical records are informative as to the nature and severity of his injuries they do not contain any clarifying information as to what activity the applicant was engaged in at the time of the incident that supports award of CRSC. While the applicant was in the training lanes exercise area, he was not participating in a combat simulation at the time his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006282

    Original file (20120006282.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * CRSC claim * DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) * Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 * Retirement orders * Multiple VA rating decisions * Previous letter from the Army Board for Correction of Military Records * CRSC denial letters from HRC-KNX, dated 1 February 2012, 2 April 2010, and 15 December 2009 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant has submitted evidence to show that his right knee injury,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020027

    Original file (20110020027.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 12 April 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110020027 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant was hospitalized on the Psychiatry Ward at Moncrief Army Hospital from 29 July through 17 August 1977.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000521

    Original file (20110000521.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant states: * U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC) CRSC Branch unjustly denied his CRSC application for a fourth time * HRC deemed his numeric assigned rated physical disabilities were not relevant to combat and/or combat-training related * the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Nashville Regional Office's Rating Decision supports his claim * the VA grossly failed to give due process...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015141

    Original file (20110015141.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). His record does not contain any evidence and he has not provided any evidence showing his medical conditions were the result of combat or the simulation of war. The available medical records show he was diagnosed with an abnormal fusion between the luntae and triquetrum bones and wrist pain.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009832

    Original file (20140009832.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant's record is void of any evidence that shows his injuries were a direct, causal relationship to war or the simulation of war. Although the evidence shows the applicant was diagnosed with Hypertensive Heart Disease, Degenerative Arthritis of the Cervical Spine, Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Syndrome with Thoracolumbar Degenerative Changes with Erectile Dysfunction, Healed Fracture; Left...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020791

    Original file (20130020791.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides copies his accident report, 45 pages of medical records, a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB), Physical Evaluation Board (PEB), DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharged from Active Duty), a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) disability evaluation, a Physical Disability Board of Review (PDBR), CRSC application and denied, CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Eligible members are those retirees who have 20 years of service for retired pay computation (or 20 years of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020373

    Original file (20130020373.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show that the leg injury he sustained on 23 January 1991 was caused by a simulation of war; therefore, in accordance with Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) guidelines it was combat-related and service-connected for the purpose of qualifying for Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC). Eligible members are those retirees who have...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003477

    Original file (20140003477.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20120022745 on 25 July 2013. Without evidence to establish a direct, causal relationship of the applicant's VA-rated disabilities to war or the simulation of war, there is an insufficient...