Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100001026
Original file (20100001026.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  22 July 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100001026 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)-rated disabilities for his right knee and right femur be approved for Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC).

2.  The applicant states he believes his consideration for CRSC should have been based on his right knee and right femur instead of his dysthymic disorder.  He further states that his right knee and right femur conditions are combat related because he first injured his right knee at Fort Benning, Georgia, simulating war and the second time he injured it was in Germany simulating war.

3.  The applicant provides:

* CRSC Final Reconsideration Request - Army Review Boards Agency (ARBA) letter
* Advanced Individual Training Diploma
* DD Form 2860 (Claim for CRSC)
* DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty)
* Standard Form 502 (Clinical Record - Narrative Summary)
* two Standard Forms 513 (Clinical Record - Consultation Sheet)
* Standard Form 600 (Health Record - Chronological Record of Medical Care)
* Standard Form 519 (Clinical Record - Radiographic Reports)



CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant's military records show he enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve for 3 years on 30 June 1975.  On 21 September 1976, he enlisted in the Regular Army.  He completed initial entry training, was awarded the military occupational specialty of infantryman, and was promoted to pay grade E-4.  He was honorably released from active duty on 21 February 1980 and placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List the following day.  On 31 December 1981, he was permanently retired.

2.  A Standard Form 502 contained in the applicant's medical records shows he was evaluated in January 1979 for symptoms of chondromalacia (abnormal softness of cartilage) of the right side.  The form states he was treated conservatively and the symptoms in his knee regressed.

3.  A Standard Form 519-B (Radiological Consultation Request/Report), dated    4 October 1990, contained in his records shows that he had a well-healed fracture regarding his right femur and his right knee had no fracture or dislocation.  It shows his right knee was negative for trauma.

4.  CRSC, as established by Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1413a, as amended, states that eligible members are retired veterans with combat-related injuries who meet all of the following criteria:

* Active, Reserve, or National Guard with 20 years of creditable service, or permanent medical retiree, or Temporary Early Retirement Authority retiree
* receiving military retired pay
* have 10 percent or greater VA-rated injury
* military retired pay is reduced by VA disability payments (VA Waiver)

and who are able to provide documentary evidence that their injury was a result of one of the following:

* training that simulates war (e.g., exercises, field training)
* hazardous duty (e.g., flight, diving, parachute duty)
* an instrumentality of war (e.g., combat vehicles, weapons, Agent Orange)
* armed conflict (e.g., gunshot wounds (Purple Heart), punji stick injuries)

5.  On 1 December 2009, the U.S. Army Physical Disability Agency CRSC Branch determined that the applicant's degenerative arthritis (left knee), dysthymic disorder, impairment of femur (right knee and leg), and scars (right thigh) were not combat related and denied his request for CRSC.
6.  The Under Secretary of Defense for Military Personnel Policy provided policy guidance on the processing of CRSC appeals.  In that guidance it was stated that in order for a condition to be considered combat related, there must be evidence of the condition having a direct causal relationship to war or the simulation of war.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant has submitted documentation showing that he was treated for disabilities that he contends are combat related.  The documents submitted by the applicant show that he has service connected conditions.  He states he injured his right knee on two separate occasions while simulating war.  However, there is no evidence or indication that these medical conditions were the result of a particular injury or trauma.

2.  As stated above, the CRSC criteria are specifically for those military retirees who have combat-related disabilities.  Incurring disabilities while in a theater of operations or in training exercises is not, in and of itself, sufficient to grant a military retiree CRSC.  The military retiree must show that the disability was incurred while engaged in combat, while performing duties simulating combat conditions, or while performing especially hazardous duties such as parachuting or scuba diving.  The applicant has failed to provide documentation to show he meets this requirement.

3.  Without evidence to establish a direct causal relationship to the applicant's VA-rated disabilities to war or the simulation of war, there is insufficient basis in which to grant his request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _____________X____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100001026



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                   

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110007831

    Original file (20110007831.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He states: * he was injured during an Army training mission in December 1963 * he fractured his third metatarsal [bones of the foot] and the distal shaft of the same metatarsal * the injury is documented in his military medical records 3. CRSC, as established by Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1413a, as amended, states that eligible members are retired veterans with combat-related injuries who meet all of the following criteria: * Active, Reserve or National Guard with 20 years of creditable...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015399

    Original file (20130015399.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC) for injuries he received on active duty during training simulating war and using an instrument of war. On 12 August 2005, the Special Actions Branch, CRSC Division, U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC), considered the applicant's claim for CSRC. The medical record he provided, dated 15 January 2013, offers insufficient evidence to support a claim to CRSC.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023266

    Original file (20110023266.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no documentation that shows he had an injury or disability which may have been combat-related or caused by an instrumentality of war. A determination that a disability is the result of an instrumentality of war may be made if the disability was incurred in any period of service as a result of such diverse causes as wounds caused by a military weapon, accidents involving a military combat vehicle, injury or sickness caused by fumes, gases, or explosion of military ordnance,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009832

    Original file (20140009832.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant's record is void of any evidence that shows his injuries were a direct, causal relationship to war or the simulation of war. Although the evidence shows the applicant was diagnosed with Hypertensive Heart Disease, Degenerative Arthritis of the Cervical Spine, Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Syndrome with Thoracolumbar Degenerative Changes with Erectile Dysfunction, Healed Fracture; Left...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016725

    Original file (20130016725.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). He indicates he can swear under oath that the patches are a direct result of combat or combat related training. Although the evidence shows the applicant was diagnosed with Degenerative Arthritis of the Spine, Left Spine, Eczema, and Tendon Inflammation Left Shoulder, unfortunately there is no evidence in the available record that shows these conditions were sustained as a direct result of armed...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004932

    Original file (20110004932.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His complete service and/or VA medical records are not available for review with this case. The troop medic completed an SF 600 for both injuries but documentation did not remain in his permanent record despite follow on medical care for those injuries; d. MFR, dated 4 August 2009, stating he sustained chronic lumbar (low back), thoracic (mid back), cervical (neck), right and left knee, right and left should pain; high frequency hearing loss, and squarmous cell carcinoma of the tongue that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010856

    Original file (20090010856.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that all of his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rated disabilities be approved for Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC). Incurring disabilities while in a theater of operations or in training exercises is not, in and of itself, sufficient to grant a military retiree CRSC. Without evidence to establish a direct, causal relationship to the applicant’s VA rated disabilities to war or the simulation of war, there is insufficient basis in which to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005437

    Original file (20110005437.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 15 September 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110005437 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. CRSC, as established by Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1413a, as amended, states that eligible members are retired veterans with combat-related injuries who meet all of the following criteria: * Active, Reserve or National Guard with 20 years of creditable service, or permanent medical retiree, or Temporary Early Retirement Authority (TERA) retiree * receiving military...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016395

    Original file (20100016395.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant submitted no documentation showing he was treated for combat related disabilities while serving on active duty and his records contain no evidence indicating such. The military retiree must show that the disability was incurred while engaged in combat, while performing duties simulating combat conditions, or while performing especially hazardous duties such as parachuting or scuba diving.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060000867C070205

    Original file (20060000867C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rated disabilities for his knees be approved for Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC). The OUSD has maintained in these opinions that in order for a condition to be considered combat related, there must be evidence of the condition having a direct, causal relationship to war or the simulation of war. Without evidence to establish a direct, causal relationship to the applicant’s VA rated disabilities to war or the...