Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006131
Original file (20110006131.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  29 September 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110006131 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Air Medal for his service in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN).

2.  The applicant states when he returned from the RVN, he went through processing in Oakland, California.  At that time the Air Medal ribbon was placed on his uniform.  He recently discovered that this medal is not shown on his DD Form 214.  He believes he qualifies for this medal in accordance with Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards), paragraph 3-16.

3.  The applicant provides no additional evidence.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  On 24 June 1969, the applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States.  He completed his initial training and was awarded military occupational specialty 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman).

3.  On 31 October 1969, the applicant departed Fort Polk, Louisiana, for duty in the RVN.

	a  On 3 December 1969, he was assigned for duty with Company D, 5th Battalion, 7th Cavalry Regiment, 1st Cavalry Division (Airmobile).

	b.  On 18 December 1969, he was reassigned as a rifleman to Company A in the same battalion.

	c.  On 3 August 1970, he was reassigned as an automatic rifleman to Headquarters and Headquarters Company in the same battalion.

	d.  On 17 November 1970, he departed the RVN en route to the United States.

4.  On 14 January 1971, he was assigned for duty at Fort Benning, Georgia.

5.  On 23 June 1971, the applicant was released from active duty.  He attained the rank of specialist four/pay grade E-4 and completed 2 years of creditable active duty service.

6.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant's DD Form 214, as corrected by a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214), lists his awards as:

* National Defense Service Medal
* Vietnam Service Medal with three bronze service stars
* RVN Campaign Medal with Device (1960)
* Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle (M-14) Bar
* Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Machine Gun (M-60) and Automatic Rifle (M-16) Bars
* Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award)
* Army Commendation Medal
* Bronze Star Medal
* Combat Infantryman Badge
* Valorous Unit Award
* RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation
* RVN Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation
7.  Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show award of the Air Medal.

8.  No flight records pertaining to the applicant were available for review.

9.  A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer Assisted Retrieval System (ADCARS) failed to reveal any orders awarding the applicant the Air Medal.  ADCARS is an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command.

10.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides that the Air Medal is awarded in time of war for heroism and for meritorious achievement or service while participating in aerial flight.  This award is primarily intended for personnel on flying status, but may also be awarded to those personnel whose combat duties require them to fly, for example, personnel in the attack elements of units involved in air-land assaults against an armed enemy.  As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.

11.  U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) provided guidelines for award of the Air Medal.  It established that passenger personnel who did not participate in an air assault were not eligible for the award based on sustained operations.  It defined terms and provided guidelines for the award based upon the number and types of missions or hours.  Twenty-five category I missions (air assault and equally dangerous missions) and accrual of a minimum of 25 hours of flight time while engaged in category I missions was the standard established for which sustained operations were deemed worthy of recognition by an award of the Air Medal.  However, the regulation was clear that these guidelines were considered only a departure point.

12.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1130, provides the legal authority for consideration of proposals for decorations not previously submitted in timely fashion.  It allows that upon the request of a Member of Congress, the Secretary concerned shall review a proposal for the award or presentation of a decoration (or the upgrading of a decoration), either for an individual or a unit, that is not otherwise authorized to be presented or awarded due to limitations established by law or policy for the timely submission of a recommendation for such award or presentation.  Based upon such review, the Secretary shall make a determination as to the merits of approving the award or presentation of the decoration.



13.  The request, with a DA Form 638 (Recommendation for Award), must be submitted through a Member of Congress to:  Commander,  U.S. Army Human Resources Command, ATTN:  AHRC-PDP-A, 1600 Spearhead Division Avenue, Fort Knox, KY  40122.  The unit must be clearly identified, along with the period of assignment and the recommended award.  A narrative of the actions or period for which recognition is being requested must accompany the DA Form 638.  Requests should be supported by sworn affidavits, eyewitness statements, certificates, and related documents.  Supporting evidence is best provided by commanders, leaders, and fellow Soldiers who had personal knowledge of the facts relative to the request.  The burden and costs for researching and assembling supporting documentation rest with the applicant.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show award of the Air Medal for his service in the RVN.

2.  There are no general orders available showing the applicant was awarded the Air Medal.  His records do not contain any flight records or other documentation indicating he met the requirements for award of the Air Medal.

3.  While the available evidence is insufficient for awarding the applicant an Air Medal, this in no way affects his right to pursue his claim for the medal by submitting a request through his Member of Congress under the provisions of Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1130.

4.  In view of the above, the applicant's request should be denied.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ____________X_____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110006131



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110006131



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017421

    Original file (20100017421.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Air Medal (AM). In the absence of orders, there is insufficient evidence to correct his records to show the AM.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013345

    Original file (20090013345.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). It allows, in effect, that upon the request of a Member of Congress, the Secretary concerned shall review a proposal for the award or presentation of a decoration (or the upgrading of a decoration), either for an individual or a unit, that is not otherwise authorized to be presented or awarded due to limitations established by law or policy for timely submission of a recommendation for such award or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010008

    Original file (20080010008.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 18 SEPTEMBER 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080010008 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant contends that he should be awarded the AM because his duties included his participation in combat air assaults as an infantryman in the RVN. The applicant provided 2 sworn affidavits as new evidence which described the nature of the unit's combat air assaults, their frequency, and attested to his participation in these air assaults.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011981

    Original file (20130011981.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: a. his awards earned for his service as a combat aviator in Vietnam were not transcribed on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) at the time of his discharge; b. he sustained a concussion during combat when his aircraft was forced to land in a rice paddy as a result of aircraft failure entitling him to the PH; c. he includes ABCMR Docket Number AR2004102091, which is identical to his in many ways, shows this warrant officer...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002938

    Original file (20110002938.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    It stated passenger personnel who did not participate in an air assault were not eligible for the award based upon sustained operations. Further, there are no flight records or unit reports available in the record or provided by the applicant to show that he participated in sufficient category I, II, or III flight missions in the RVN to qualify for the AM. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015164

    Original file (20100015164.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    BOARD DATE: 3 May 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100015164 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. There are no orders or any other evidence in his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) showing he was awarded the Air Medal. This pamphlet shows the 162nd Aviation Company was cited for award of the RVN Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation for the period 19 December 1966 - 28 June 1969 by Department of the Army General Orders Number 59, dated 1969.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018202

    Original file (20130018202.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    BOARD DATE: 19 June 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130018202 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states: a. he received the Air Medal along with the Bronze Star Medal in front of his unit in Vietnam in 1968; and b. he believes he went on the required number of combat air missions to receive the Air Medal. _________x_______________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002617

    Original file (20110002617.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). U.S. Army Vietnam (USARV) Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) provided guidelines for award of the Air Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending item 24 of his DD Form 214 by: a. deleting the current VSM and ARCOM entries and b. adding the Vietnam Service Medal with 4 bronze service stars, Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007254

    Original file (20080007254.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's Enlisted Qualification Record (DA Form 20) shows he served in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) from 4 May 1969 through 11 July 1969. Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of the applicant's DA Form 20 does not include the AM in the list of awards entered, and his record is void of any orders or other documents showing he was ever recommended for or awarded the AM by proper authority while serving on active duty. The evidence of record fails to show the applicant was ever...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018069

    Original file (20100018069.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There are no orders or any other documents on file in the applicant's MPRJ to show he was ever recommended for or awarded the PH or AM. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes Army policy and criteria concerning individual military awards. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Purple Heart for wounds received on 29 April 1968; b. amending item 24 of his DD Form 214 by adding...