Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007254
Original file (20080007254.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	  13 August 2008

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080007254 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Air Medal (AM).

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he was awarded the AM at the same time he received his Purple Heart (PH) while in the hospital in Japan.  He now requests the AM be added to his separation document (DD Form 214).

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214 and ABCMR Letter, dated 21 March 2008, in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.


2.   The applicant's record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army and entered active duty on 26 September 1968.  He was trained in and awarded the primary military occupational specialty (MOS) of 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman), and the highest rank he attained while serving on active duty was specialist five (SP5).  

3.  The applicant's Enlisted Qualification Record (DA Form 20) shows he served in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) from 4 May 1969 through 11 July 1969.  Item 38 (Record of Assignments) shows that during his RVN tour, he was assigned to the Company A, 1st Battalion, 2nd Infantry, 1st Infantry Division, performing duties in MOS 11B as a rifleman.  

4.  Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of the applicant's DA Form 20 does not include the AM in the list of awards entered, and his record is void of any orders or other documents showing he was ever recommended for or awarded the AM by proper authority while serving on active duty.  

5.  On 5 October 1970, the applicant was honorably discharged by reason of physical disability with severance pay, after completing a total of 2 years, 
3 months, and 24 days of active military service.  The DD Form 214 he was issued at that time shows he earned the following awards:  PH; National Defense Service Medal; Vietnam Service Medal with 2 bronze service stars; RVN Campaign Medal with 1960 Device; Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle (M14 & M16) Bar; and Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Machinegun (M-60) Bar.  The AM was not included in the list of awards contained on the DD Form 214 and the applicant authenticated the separation document with his signature in Item 32 (Signature of Person Being Transferred or Discharged) on the date of his discharge.  

6.  The record shows the applicant's record was administratively corrected and a 
DD Form 215 was issued documenting these corrections on 16 June 2008.  This correction added the Combat Infantryman Badge, Army Good Conduct Medal, Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation Badge, Valorous Unit Award, and Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Grenade Bar to the awards already listed on the applicant's DD Form 214.  It also amended Item 30 (Remarks) of the original DD Form 214 by adding the entry "SERVICE IN VIETMAN FROM: 4 MAY 969 to 2 JULY 1969." 

7.  During the processing of this case, a member of the Board the Department of the Army (DA) Awards and Decorations Computer Assisted Retrieval System (ADCARS), which contains award orders issued during the Vietnam Era.  There were no AM orders pertaining to the applicant on file on ADCARS.  

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes the Army's awards policy.  Paragraph 3-15 contains guidance on the AM.  It states, in pertinent part, that it is awarded in time of war for heroism and for meritorious achievement or service while participating in aerial flight. The AM is awarded to any person who, while serving in any capacity in or with the U.S. Army, will have distinguished himself or herself by meritorious achievement while participating in aerial flight. Awards may be made to recognize single acts of merit or heroism, or for meritorious service.

9.  United States Army Vietnam (USARV) Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) provided local USARV awards policy.  It also established guidelines for award of the AM in the RVN.  It defined terms and provided guidelines for the award based upon the number and types of missions or hours.  Combat missions were divided into three categories:  Category I (air assault and equally dangerous missions); Category II (support rendered a friendly force immediately before, during or immediately following a combat operation); and Category III (support of friendly forces not connected with an immediate combat operation).  

10.  The USARV awards regulation stipulated that to be recommended for award of the AM, an individual must have completed a minimum of 25 Category I missions, 50 Category II missions, or 100 Category III missions.  Since various types of missions would have been completed in accumulating flight time toward award of an AM for sustained operations, different computations would have had to be made to combine Category I, II and III flight time and adjust it to a common denominator.  A Category I mission was defined as a mission performed in a "combat assault" (CA) role; a Category II mission was defined as a mission performed in "direct combat support" (DCS) role; and a Category III mission was defined as one performed in an "other combat support" (OCS) role.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that he is entitled to the AM was carefully considered.  However, there is insufficient evidence to support his claim.  

2.  By regulation the AM is awarded in time of war for heroism and for meritorious achievement or service while participating in aerial flight to any person who, while serving in any capacity in or with the U.S. Army, will have distinguished himself or herself by meritorious achievement while participating in aerial flight.  

3.  The evidence of record fails to show the applicant was ever recommended for or awarded the AM by proper authority while serving on active duty, and his record is void of any flight records confirming he completed the necessary hours and missions to qualify for award of the AM.  
4.  Further, the AM is not included in the list of awards contained in Item 41 of his DA Form 20, or the list of awards contained on his DD Form 214, which he authenticated with his signature on the date of his separation.  In effect, his signature was his verification that the information contained on the DD Form 214, to include the list of awards was correct at the time the document was prepared and issued.  As a result, absent any evidence of record or independent evidence that confirms the applicant qualified for or was awarded the AM, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis to grant the requested relief. 

5.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ___x____  ____x___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _x   _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080007254



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080007254



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070014691

    Original file (20070014691.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application: Third-Party Statement; a USARV Form 131 (Awards and Qualification Record (Air Medal)); Separation Document (DD Form 214); Correction to DD Form 214 (DD Form 215); and Awards Regulation Extracts. The record shows the applicant's record was administratively corrected and a DD Form 215 was issued documenting these corrections on 30 March 1997. The evidence of record fails to show the applicant was ever recommended...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000701

    Original file (20080000701.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The MPRJ is void of any orders, or other documents that indicate he was ever recommended for, or awarded the AM, and of any flight records documenting his flight hours and types of flight missions performed in the RVN. It is also void of any flight records documenting the amount of hours and category of missions the applicant completed in the performance of his aerial flight duties while serving in the RVN. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006348

    Original file (20090006348.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It states, in pertinent part, that in order to support award of the PH there must be evidence that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action, that it required treatment by military personnel, and a record of this treatment must have been made a matter of official record. The evidence of record fails to show the applicant was ever recommended for or awarded the AM while serving on active duty. In order to justify correction of a military record the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070004899C071029

    Original file (20070004899C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his record be corrected to show he was awarded the Air Medal (AM) with "V" (Valor) Device for heroism and to include all other awards to which he may be entitled. The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application: 1 April 1971 DD Form 214; Flight Record (DA Form 759), dated 29 May 1970; AM (Sixth through Twenty-First Award) Citation; and Newspaper Article. Item 21 (Awards and Decorations) of the applicant's DA Form 66...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002899

    Original file (20090002899.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in two separate applications and through a Member of Congress, that the Silver Star (SS) and Defense Meritorious Service Medal (DMSM) be added to his official military personnel file (OMPF) and that he be awarded the Air Medal (AM). The evidence of record fails to show the applicant was ever recommended for or awarded the AM by proper authority while serving on active duty...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002617

    Original file (20110002617.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). U.S. Army Vietnam (USARV) Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) provided guidelines for award of the Air Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending item 24 of his DD Form 214 by: a. deleting the current VSM and ARCOM entries and b. adding the Vietnam Service Medal with 4 bronze service stars, Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002601

    Original file (20090002601.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides a statement from an individual who indicates he was assigned for duty with the applicant in the RVN and that they flew many hours on combat assaults and missions together. Therefore, since the applicant's unit routinely participated in air assault Category I missions, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the AM and to add it to his record and DD Form 214 at this time. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013714

    Original file (20140013714 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant contends, in effect, that his records should be corrected to show 15 additional awards of the AM (i.e., the AM with Numeral 16) because he accrued 763 hours of combat assault or combat support flight time. There is no evidence that shows the applicant was recommended for or awarded more than one AM. e. However, based on the evidence of record (i.e., certification by the operations officer that the applicant accrued 453 flight hours) and the conclusion they were category III...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070007225C080407

    Original file (20070007225C080407.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Chester A. Damian | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant states, in effect, that he requests to be awarded the AM and ACB based on the over 500 hours of combat aerial flight missions he participated in during the period 28 April through 4 September 1971, while serving in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN). The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application: Enlisted...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019437

    Original file (20130019437.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    BOARD DATE: 15 July 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130019437 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show 36 awards of the Air Medal (AM), the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle and Pistol Bars, and campaign participation credit for the 1968 Tet...