Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005310
Original file (20110005310.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		

		BOARD DATE:	  21 September 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110005310 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to reflect his active duty service performed while completing his basic and advanced individual training.

2.  The applicant states that he served 3 months of active duty while completing basic and advanced individual training which is not reflected on his DD Form 214.

3.  The applicant provides no additional documents with his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the United States Army Reserve (USAR) on 21 February 1997 for a period of 8 years and training as a combat engineer.  He was ordered to active duty training on 22 May 1997 and was transferred to Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri to undergo his one-station unit training (OSUT).  He completed his OSUT and was released from active duty on 28 August 1997 after having served 3 months and 7 days of active service.  He was returned to his USAR unit in Florida.

3.  On 19 December 2000 he enlisted in the Regular Army for a period of 3 years, duty as a combat engineer and assignment to Fort Lewis, Washington. 

4.  On 29 August 2001 he was discharged under honorable conditions under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12C, due to misconduct.  He had served 8 months and 11 days of active service during this enlistment and his DD Form 214 shows in block 12d. that he had 3 months and 20 days of prior active service.  

5.  Army Regulation 635-5 serves as the authority for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It provides, in pertinent part, that the DD Form 214 will be prepared to reflect information contained in official records in effect at the time the DD Form 214 is prepared.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement. 

2.  The applicant’s prior active service and inactive service appears to be properly reflected on his DD Form 214.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence to show otherwise, there appears to be no basis to add any additional service to his DD Form 214. 

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__x___  ____x____  ___x_____  DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _  x_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110005310





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110005310



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012254

    Original file (20130012254.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests reconsideration of his previous request for an upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions discharge. Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army. The evidence of record shows he completed OSUT at Fort Knox, KY and was awarded MOS 19D.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015717

    Original file (20130015717.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he was serving either as an E-2 or E-3 when he was discharged and all of his duty days are not reflected on his DD Form 214. He was honorably discharged from the USAR in the pay grade of E-2 on 19 December 1989. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to show that he had more service or was serving in a higher rank during the period covered by the DD Form 214, there appears to be no basis to approve his application.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005723

    Original file (20110005723.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He also states that his awards of the BSM w/1OLC and the AGCM are also not entered on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). He had served a total of 3 years, 1 month, and 11 days of active service and his DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD shows that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Campaign Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), the BSM w/“V” Device, and the Vietnam Cross of Gallantry with Gold Star. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007372

    Original file (20080007372.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 23 September 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080007372 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant deployed with his unit from Germany to Iraq in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004751C070206

    Original file (20050004751C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    John Mueller | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests that his report of separation (DD Form 214) be corrected to reflect his Guatemala Meritorious Service Award, his Noncommissioned Officer Professional Development (NCOPD) Ribbon, the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM), and the Army Service Ribbon (ASR). Army Regulation 635-5 serves as the authority for the preparation of the DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010376

    Original file (20110010376.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show all of his military training; his service (and duties) in Germany; his service during Operation Desert Shield/Desert Storm; his Reserve service; and all of his awards. The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time shows in: a. item 12f (Foreign Service) the entry "02 05 23" indicating he completed 2 years, 5 months, and 23 days of foreign service during his period of active service; b. item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060006864C070205

    Original file (20060006864C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides a copy of an award certificate from Bravo Company, 39th Engineer Battalion (Combat) which shows Permanent Orders 133- 22, dated 10 July 1992, awarded him the Army Achievement Medal for meritorious service as a combat engineer from 22 April 1988 through 1 August 1992. There is no indication in the applicant's service personnel records to show that he was assigned to any other unit than his parent unit, the 39th Engineer Battalion, while deployed to Southwest Asia. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069899C070402

    Original file (2002069899C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The Board considered the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013164

    Original file (20080013164.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, that Item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) and Item 14 (Military Education) of his separation document (DD Form 214) be corrected. By regulation, Item 13 of the DD Form 214 lists awards for all periods of service and Item 14 documents formal in-service (full-time attendance) training courses successfully...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004338

    Original file (20090004338.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that he be provided a DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show that he served on active duty for 180 days beginning on 30 November 1990. On 24 February 2009, officials at the National Personnel Records Center in St. Louis, Missouri advised the applicant that a DD Form 214 is not issued to Reserve Component personnel for periods less than 90 days in duration.