Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015717
Original file (20130015717.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  6 May 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130015717 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show that his rank at the time of his discharge was either E-2 or E-3 and that all of his service be reflected.

2.  The applicant states he was serving either as an E-2 or E-3 when he was discharged and all of his duty days are not reflected on his DD Form 214.  He served honorably and figured that he would have at least qualified for Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Loan Eligibility. 

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 20 December 1983 for a period of 6 years.  He was ordered to active duty for training (ADT) on 
17 January 1984 and was transferred to Fort Jackson, South Carolina to undergo his one-station unit training (OSUT) as a light wheel vehicle and power generator mechanic.

3.  On 23 June 1984, he was honorably released from ADT in the pay grade of 
E-1 and was returned to his USAR unit.  He had served 5 months and 7 days of ADT.

4.  He was advanced to the pay grade of E-2 on 17 July 1984 and on 22 March 1985, he was transferred to the USAR Control Group (Annual Training) due to unsatisfactory participation.  He was honorably discharged from the USAR in the pay grade of E-2 on 19 December 1989.

5.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) at the time served as the authority for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It provided that the DD Form 214 would be prepared to reflect information as it exists in the official records at the time of separation.  It also provided that changes that occurred subsequent to the date covered by the DD Form 214 would not be entered retroactively on that form.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contention that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to reflect changes in his rank and service performed during his service has been noted.

2.  The applicant’s DD Form 214 correctly reflects his rank and service during the period covered by the DD Form 214.  Accordingly, there is no error or injustice in his case. 

3.  The applicable regulation provides that a DD Form 214 will not be corrected/altered to add information that occurs outside of the period covered by that form.

4.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence to show that he had more service or was serving in a higher rank during the period covered by the DD Form 214, there appears to be no basis to approve his application.





BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   ___X____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130015717





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130015717



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007403

    Original file (20080007403.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show his rank and grade as Private First Class (PFC), E-3, and to show his correct dates of service. It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement or discharge. There is no evidence of record to show that the applicant was advanced to PFC, E-3, at any time during his service in the ARNG/USAR.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012936

    Original file (20080012936.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, his records do not reflect his active duty and active duty for training (ADT) during the period of July 1975 when he performed 14 days of annual training (AT). However, he was credited with 324 active duty points during the period of 21 July 1982 to 20 July 1983 and there is insufficient evidence to determine whether the applicant was or was not credited with this period of service. The applicant has not provided, and the records do not contain sufficient...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000989

    Original file (20090000989.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show in Item 7 (Last Duty Assignment and Major Command) that he served in Honduras and in Germany, and that Item 11 (Primary Specialty) be corrected by adding military occupational specialty (MOS) 63J, Quartermaster and Chemical Equipment Repairer. The applicant states, in effect, that Item 7 does not show he served in Honduras in 1988 and in Germany. However, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004105785C070208

    Original file (2004105785C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his most recent Certificate of Release or Discharge (DD Form 214) be corrected to reflect the active duty service that he performed in Grenada in 1984 and in Cuba in 1994. A DD Form 214 was prepared for the applicant releasing him from active duty and reflecting his active duty service in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending the DD Form 214 for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020702

    Original file (20100020702.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that her DD Form 214 Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be updated to reflect all of her active duty periods and her military occupational specialty (MOS) of a chaplain’s assistant. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089909C070403

    Original file (2003089909C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT STATES : In effect, that his supervisor stated that the DD Form 214 that he has only shows his boot camp and ADT (active duty for training) service. The applicant was provided a DD Form 214 to document this service in compliance with the applicable regulation.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009278

    Original file (20090009278.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military records show that he enlisted in the United States Army Reserve (USAR) on 13 May 1983. It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement or discharge. The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show he served 2 and 1/2 years of active Army Reserve service between 1983 and 1986.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006298

    Original file (20130006298.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show her grade/rank as sergeant (SGT)/E-5 and her service in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) from December 1983 to December 1989. The available evidence shows she was promoted to SGT/E-5 on 21 April 1989, some 5 years after she had been released from active duty and after her DD Form 214 had been issued. It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021518

    Original file (20100021518.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to reflect his character of service as honorable. The applicant provides: * his DD Form 214 for the period ending 13 August 1992 * his Honorable Discharge Certificate, dated 26 October 1999 * orders showing he was honorably discharged, dated 26 October 1999 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. It does not appear that the applicant served on active duty for a period long enough to qualify...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009321

    Original file (20100009321.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant's service record does not indicate he completed 90 days or more of continuous active duty after 11 June 1991. Therefore, the applicant is not eligible for issuance of a DD Form 214 to show the following actions which occurred after the period covered his DD Form 214, dated 11 June 1991: * promotion to SGT/E-5 effective 29 June 1992 * 2 years of time in grade which he served in the...