Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005070
Original file (20110005070.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  1 September 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110005070 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB).

2.  The applicant states he received combat pay or hazardous duty pay and he saw combat.  He further states he would be proud to receive it and give it to his son.

3.  The applicant provides no additional documentary evidence in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.


2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 10 February 1967.  He completed training and he was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 61C (marine engineer).  He was later awarded MOS 64B (heavy vehicle driver), which became his secondary MOS, and MOS 51B (carpenter), which became his primary MOS.

3.  The highest rank/grade he attained while serving on active duty was specialist five (SP5)/E-5.

4.  The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in:

	a.  Item 31 (Foreign Service) he served in Vietnam from 20 April 1968 through 2 February 1969.

	b.  Item 38 (Record of Assignments) he was assigned to Company D,
69th Engineer Battalion, performing duties in MOS 51B as a heavy construction carpenter through his service in Vietnam.

	c.  Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) an entry for the CIB.

5.  The applicant's Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) is void of orders or any other documents that indicate he was ever recommended for or awarded the CIB for his service in Vietnam.

6.  On 29 January 1969, the applicant was honorably released from active duty as an overseas returnee.  He completed 1 year, 11 months, and 20 days of total active service.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Authorized) of the DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) he was issued at the time does not list the CIB.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the CIB is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry MOS.  They must have served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental or smaller size.  Additionally, Appendix V of U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Awards and Decorations) states that during the Vietnam era the Combat Infantryman Badge was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11D, 11F, 11G, or 11H.

8.  U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 also stated that criteria for award of the CIB identified the man who trained, lived, and fought as an infantryman and that 


the CIB was the unique award established to recognize the infantryman and only the infantryman for his service. Further, “the CIB is not an award for being shot at or for undergoing the hazards of day to day combat.”  This regulation also stated the CIB was authorized for award to infantry officers, to enlisted personnel, and to warrant officers who had an infantry specialty/MOS and required that they must have served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental or smaller size.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's record is void of any evidence and he has not provided any evidence showing he was ever awarded or recommended for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge.  By regulation, in order to support award of the Combat Infantryman Badge, there must not only be evidence that a member served in an infantry MOS in an infantry unit, but also that he was personally present and participated with the qualifying infantry unit while it was engaged in active ground combat with enemy forces.

2.  In the absence of official orders or other documentary evidence such as operation reports, after action reports, valor awards, witness statements, or any other evidence that conclusively shows he held an infantry MOS and he actively participated in ground combat while assigned to an infantry unit, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Combat Infantryman Badge in this case.

3.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

4.  The applicant and all others concerned should know this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by him in service to our Nation.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X____  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _ X _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110005070



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110005070



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000523

    Original file (20120000523.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military record shows he was inducted into the Army of the United States (AUS), in pay grade E-1, on 11 May 1966. Therefore, he is not entitled to correction to Item 19 on his DD Form 214 to show pay grade E-4. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to correcting his DD Form 214 by adding to: * Item 19 the pay grade of E-4 * Item 24 the CIB _______ _ __X_____ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017106

    Original file (20100017106.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no orders in his records that show he was awarded the CIB. However, there is no evidence in the available records and he did not submit substantiating evidence that shows he was awarded the CIB or that he was assigned to an infantry unit or that he was an active participant in ground combat while assigned to an infantry unit. In the absence of official orders or other documentary evidence such as operation reports, after action reports, valor awards, witness statements, or any...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006782

    Original file (20080006782.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    During its original review of the case, the Board found no evidence of record that showed the applicant served in active ground combat while an assigned member of an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size, and as a result, concluded there was insufficient evidence to support award of the CIB. Further, the evidence provided by the applicant places him with his qualifying infantry unit while it was engaged in active ground combat with enemy forces in the RVN. As a result, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014686

    Original file (20110014686.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the Combat Infantryman Badge. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned. __________X______________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004176

    Original file (20090004176.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence in the applicant's records which shows he was awarded or recommended for the CIB. Further, “the Combat Infantryman Badge is not an award for being shot at or for undergoing the hazards of day to day combat.” This regulation also stated the Combat Infantryman Badge was authorized for award to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry military occupational specialty (MOS) and required that they must have served in active ground...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010081

    Original file (20080010081.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He had served 3 years of total active service and his DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD shows that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal. The applicant has not provided and the records do not contain orders awarding the applicant the CIB for his service in Vietnam. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011082

    Original file (20110011082.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no orders in the applicant's records awarding him the CIB. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the CIB is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry MOS. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014005

    Original file (20090014005.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no orders in the applicant's records that show he was awarded the CIB. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides for award of the CIB. During the Vietnam era, the CIB was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11F, 11G, or 11H.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020234

    Original file (20090020234.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides for award of the CIB. In the absence of evidence that he served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental or smaller size, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the CIB in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004419

    Original file (20120004419.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 13 September 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120004419 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the CIB is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry MOS. Although he contends he served with either the 18th or 26th Infantry in Vietnam, the evidence of record shows he served in MOS 13E while assigned to Battery C, 1st Battalion, 7th Artillery, 1st Infantry...