Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004770
Original file (20110004770.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  30 August 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110004770 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to add the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) and Republic of Vietnam (RVN) Campaign Medal.

2.  The applicant states he served in Vietnam for 7 months from April to August 1972 [sic] with the 572nd Transportation Company.  He needs this documented on his DD Form 214 for the purpose of applying for Department of Veterans Affairs benefits.

3.  The applicant provides a letter of appreciation and safe driving award orders in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army on 18 October 1971 and was trained in and awarded military occupational specialty 64C (Motor Transport Operator).

3.  The applicant's record does not contain a DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) documenting his service through 1974.  The record does contain a DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record – Part II) that appears to have been prepared on 15 March 1974 based on the first entry in item 35 (Record of Assignments).  The DA Form 2 (Personnel Qualification Record – Part I) prepared on 25 June 1974 included in the record lists a date returned from overseas (DROS) of 4 November 1972 in item 35 (DROS/Date Eligible for Return from Overseas).

4.  The applicant's military personnel records jacket (MPRJ) contains a letter of commendation from the commander of the 572nd Transportation Company, RVN, dated 5 November 1972.  The commander commends the applicant for his duty performance as a truck driver for the unit for the past 7 months while stationed at Camp Horn, Da Nang, RVN.

5.  His MPRJ also contains promotion orders issued by the 516th Personnel Service Company, RVN, dated 17 July 1972, appointing the applicant to the rank of specialist four/E-4 effective 9 June 1972.

6.  On 17 October 1974, the applicant was honorably released from active duty after completing 3 years of active military service.  The DD Form 214 he was issued contains the entry "0  0   0" in item 18f (Foreign and/or Sea Service This Period) and documents no RVN service in item 27 (Remarks).  Item 26 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) lists only the National Defense Service Medal.

7.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents that must be prepared for Soldiers on retirement, discharge, or release from active duty service or control of the Active Army.  It also establishes standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  The version of the regulation in effect at the time of the applicant's discharge provided for entering all overseas service completed during the period covered by the DD Form 214 in item 18f and all awards and decorations earned during the period in item 26.  It also provided for an entry documenting inclusive dates of Vietnam service in item 27.

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) contains the Army awards policy.  Paragraph 2-13 contains guidance on the VSM and states it is authorized for Vietnam service after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973.  It further states a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each campaign a member is credited with participating in while serving in the RVN.  Table B-1 contains a list of campaigns and shows that during the applicant's tenure of assignment, participation credit was granted for the Vietnam Cease-Fire campaign (30 March 1972-28 January 1973).

9.  Paragraph 9-13 of the awards regulation contains guidance on the RVN Campaign Medal.  It is authorized for 6 or more months of service in the RVN performed between 1 March 1961 and 28 March 1973.  A Device (1960) is authorized for wear with this award.

10.  Department of the Army General Orders 8, dated 1974, announced award of the RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation for service in the RVN during the period 8 February 1962 to 28 March 1973.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's request for correction of his DD Form 214 to add his RVN service and the VSM and RVNCM has been carefully considered and was found to have merit.  Although the exact dates of his service in the RVN are not documented in his record, promotion orders and a letter of commendation in the record confirm he served in the RVN for 7 months and his DA Form 2 confirms his DROS date as 4 November 1972.  Therefore, it is reasonable to establish that the applicant served in the RVN for approximately 7 months between April and November 1972.

2.  Based on his 7 months of service in the RVN, he is eligible for the VSM with one bronze service star, RVN Campaign Medal with Device (1960), and RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation.  As a result, it would be appropriate to correct items 12f, 26, and 27 of his DD Form 214 to document his service in the RVN and to add the awards he is eligible for based on this service.

BOARD VOTE:

____X____  ___X_____  ___X_____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his DD Form 214 as follows:

	a.  item 18f – deleting the current entry and replacing it with the entry "0000  07  00";

	b.  item 26 – adding the Vietnam Service Medal with one bronze service star, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), and Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation; and

	c.  item 27 – adding the entry "VIETNAM SERVICE 19720403-19721104)."



      ____________X_____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110004770



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110004770



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003400C070206

    Original file (20050003400C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Department of the Army General Order Number 8, dated in 1974, authorized the award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation to all personnel assigned to the RVN from 8 February 1962 through 28 March 1973. Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice related to the MUC and RVN Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation now under consideration on 2 May 1969, the date of his separation. Therefore, the Board requests that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | AR20140008952

    Original file (AR20140008952.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He states his DD Form 214 does not show his service in Vietnam; however, he was there in 1971. His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in: * item 31 (Foreign Service), he completed foreign service in – * U.S. Army Europe (USAREUR) from 1 April 1971 to 18 July 1971 * U.S. Army Pacific (USARPAC)/Republic of Vietnam (RVN) from 9 September 1971 through 22 March 1972 * item 38 (Record of Assignments), he was assigned to duty in Vietnam with two units – * Company H, 75th Rangers, 3rd...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040003592C070208

    Original file (20040003592C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, it would be appropriate to account for this service in Items 18f and 19 of his DD Form 214. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief and to excuse failure to timely file. The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000958

    Original file (20120000958.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, correction to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States report of Transfer or Discharge), for the period ending 27 January 1978, to show: * Item 18f (Foreign and/or Sea Service This Period) a credit for his service in Vietnam * Item 26 (Decorations, Medals, Commendations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) all and any awards he is entitled to 2. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110008738

    Original file (20110008738.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His record contains orders showing he was awarded the AM (2nd through 5th Award). His records show he participated in three campaigns while serving in Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the AGCM (First Award) for the period 8 February 1971 through 7 February 1974; b. deleting the VSM with one bronze service star from his DD Form 214; and c. adding the following to his DD Form 214: *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019064

    Original file (20100019064.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show this unit award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting the VSM from item 24 of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 14 March 1972; and b. adding the following awards to item 24 of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 14 March 1972: * RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation * VSM with one silver service star * Expert Marksmanship...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018209

    Original file (20100018209.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The regulation in effect at the time of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 12 March 1970 provided that for: a. item 18 (Record of Service), all service shown in 18a through 18f will be less time lost; and b. item 19, for Vietnam service place an X in the "yes" block and show the specific dates of service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006998

    Original file (20140006998.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Based upon this, his request for the award of the PUC should not be granted, but his DD Form 214 should reflect the award of the MUC and the RVN Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation. Records also show the applicant: * received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings for each duty assignment and there is no record of a commander's disqualification for award of the AGCM; therefore, it would be appropriate to award this medal for the period from 14 December 1970 through 17...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007949

    Original file (20120007949.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), Combat Service Medal (taken to mean the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB)), the Southwest Asia Service Medal (SWASM), and, in effect, the Purple Heart. There is no evidence of record that shows he was ever awarded an infantry MOS by orders. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002124

    Original file (20090002124.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    BOARD DATE: 6 August 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090002124 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. He also provides an ARCOM certificate signed by the same CG on 17 April 1972, which shows he was awarded the ARCOM for meritorious service in the RVN during the period from August 1971 through April 1972. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending item 24 of his DD Form 214 by adding the Purple Heart, Army...