RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 12 April 2005
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20040003592
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.
| |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | |Director |
| |Mr. Joseph A. Adriance | |Analyst |
The following members, a quorum, were present:
| |Mr. John N. Slone | |Chairperson |
| |Ms. Shirley L. Powell | |Member |
| |Mr. Curtis Greenway | |Member |
The Board considered the following evidence:
Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.
Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests, in effect, that his record be corrected to
reflect the proper rank he held upon his separation and to acknowledge his
service in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN).
2. The applicant states, in effect, that he served on a special assignment
in the RVN from May through August 1972. He further states that his
separation document (DD Form 214) shows he received an honorable discharge,
but as a private/E-1 (PV1), which in his opinion is wrong.
3. The applicant provides a self-authored statement and a chronological
record of medical care (SF 600) in support of his application.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error or injustice
that occurred on 12 July 1974. The application submitted in this case is
dated
21 June 2004.
2. Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law allows the Army
Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file
within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to do so. In this case, the ABCMR will
conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.
3. The applicant’s record shows that he enlisted in the Regular Army and
entered active duty on 4 June 1971. He was trained in, awarded and served
in military occupational specialty (MOS) 27E (Wire Guided Systems
Repairer).
4. The applicant’s Enlisted Qualification Record (DA Form 20) shows the
applicant served in the RVN from 4 May through 11 August 1972. While in
the RVN, he was assigned to the 25 Maintenance Company, 266th Maintenance
Battalion, United States Army Vietnam (USARV), performing duties in MOS
27E.
5. Item 33 (Appointments and Reductions) of the applicant’s DA Form 20
shows that he was initially promoted to private first class (PFC) on 1
December 1971, and that this is the highest rank he attained while serving
on active duty. It also shows that he was reduced to private/E-2 (PV2) on
23 March 1972, promoted back to PFC on 13 June 1972 and reduced to
private/E-1, which is the rank he held at the time of his separation, on 13
August 1973.
6. Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of the applicant’s DA Form 20 shows
that during his active duty tenure, he earned the National Defense Service
Medal (NDSM), Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), RVN Campaign Medal (RVNCM), and
Expert Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar.
7. The applicant’s disciplinary history includes his acceptance of
nonjudicial punishment (NJP) under the provisions of Article 15 of the
Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) on seven separate occasions between
22 March 1972 and 18 December 1973. It also includes his accrual of 38
days if time lost due to being absent without leave (AWOL) on two separate
occasions between 4 June and 19 September 1973.
8. On 12 July 1974, the applicant was honorably separated at the
expiration of his term of service. The DD Form 214 he was issued shows
that he completed a total of 3 years of creditable active military service
and accrued 38 days of time lost due to AWOL at the time of his separation.
The DD Form 214 also shows that the applicant held the rank of PV1 on the
date of his discharge and that he had earned the NDSM, VSM, RVNCM and
Expert Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar during his active duty tenure.
9. Item 18f (Foreign and/or Sea Service This Period) of the applicant’s DD
Form 214 contains an entry indicating the applicant completed no foreign
service. Item 27 (Remarks) is also void of any entry confirming the
applicant’s RVN service.
10. The applicant provides an SF 600 that shows he was treated for a
gunshot wound to the head on 19 July 1972. This medical treatment record
confirms the wound was sustained in a confrontation in the local village,
which indicates the wound was not combat related.
11. Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation
documents that must be prepared for Soldiers on retirement, discharge,
release from active duty service, or control of the Active Army. It also
establishes standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form
214. The regulation contains item by item preparation instructions for the
DD Form 214.
12. The version of Army Regulation 635-5 in effect at the time stipulated
that foreign service performed during the period covered by the DD Form 214
would entered in Item 18f. The instructions for completing Item 19
(Indochina or Korea Service Since August 5, 1964) stated that RNV service
would be accounted for by checking the “Yes” block and entering the
specific dates of service. The regulation further stated that Item 27
would contain an entry indicating the “Country In Which The Last Period of
Overseas Service Was Performed”.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The evidence of record confirms the applicant served in the RVN from 4
May through 11 August 1972. Therefore, it would be appropriate to account
for this service in Items 18f and 19 of his DD Form 214.
2. The applicant’s claim that the PV1 rank entered on his DD Form 214 is
not appropriate given his honorable service was also considered. However,
the applicant’s record confirms he had an extensive disciplinary history.
This misconduct resulted in his being reduced to PV1 prior to his
separation. Finally, the record confirms he held the rank of PV1 at the
time of his separation. Therefore, there is no error or injustice related
to the rank listed on his separation document.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
___SLP _ ___JNS _ ___CG__ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
1. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to
warrant a recommendation for partial relief and to excuse failure to timely
file. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army
records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his 17 July
1974 DD Form 214 as follows: Item 18f - delete the current entry and
replace it with the entry “0 years
3 months, 8 days”; Item 19 by checking the “YES” block and entering the
dates “4 May 72 to 11 Aug 72” and Item 27 by adding the entry “Last Country
in Which Overseas Service Was Performed - Vietnam”; and by providing him a
corrected separation document that reflects these changes.
2. The Board further determined that the evidence presented is
insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief. As a result,
the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to
a correction of the rank listed on the DD Form 214.
____John N. Slone______
CHAIRPERSON
INDEX
|CASE ID |AR20040003592 |
|SUFFIX | |
|RECON | |
|DATE BOARDED |2005/04/12 |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE |HD |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE |1974/07/12 |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY |AR 635-200 |
|DISCHARGE REASON |ETS |
|BOARD DECISION |GRANT PARTIAL |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
|ISSUES 1. 1021 |100.0000 |
|2. | |
|3. | |
|4. | |
|5. | |
|6. | |
-----------------------
[pic]
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004770
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Although the exact dates of his service in the RVN are not documented in his record, promotion orders and a letter of commendation in the record confirm he served in the RVN for 7 months and his DA Form 2 confirms his DROS date as 4 November 1972. As a result, it would be appropriate to correct items 12f, 26, and 27 of his DD Form 214 to document his service in the RVN and to add the awards he is...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009316
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Item 2 (Grade) shows the FSM held the rank of PFC and Item 3 (Date of Rank) shows 20 February 1969. Item 24 of the FSM's DD Form 214, as amended by a DD Form 215 (Correction to the DD Form 214) issued on 25 June 2007, shows the FSM earned the following awards during his active duty tenure: NDSM, BSM with "V" Device and 1st Oak Leaf Cluster, RVNCM, VSM, AM and CIB.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080553C070215
The DD Form 214 issued to the applicant at the time confirmed that he was discharged under the provisions of chapter 10, Army Regulation 635-200, for the good of the service, in lieu of court-martial, and accordingly was assigned an SPD code of 246. It also stipulates that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each campaign a member was credited with while serving in the RVN. Therefore, the Board concludes that it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s separation...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074835C070403
The applicant’s record contains no DD Form 214 for his first period of active duty service from 20 January 1969 through 17 January 1971. The Board also notes that the record contains no evidence that a DD Form 214 was issued to the applicant for his active duty period of service from 20 January 1969 through 17 January 1971, the period during which he completed his first tour in the RVN. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by issuing the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089967C070403
The applicant’s DA Form 20 confirms that he served overseas in the ROK from 13 March through 31 October 1968, and in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) from 9 December 1968 through 9 September 1969. The applicant’s Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) contains no award orders or other documents that indicate he was ever recommended for or received any individual awards for meritorious service or achievement while serving on active duty. The necessary administrative correction of his records...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012580
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, that Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his separation document (DD Form 214) be corrected to show the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation (RVNGC) and all other awards not listed. The evidence of record confirms that based on his RVN service and campaign...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | AR20140008952
He states his DD Form 214 does not show his service in Vietnam; however, he was there in 1971. His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in: * item 31 (Foreign Service), he completed foreign service in * U.S. Army Europe (USAREUR) from 1 April 1971 to 18 July 1971 * U.S. Army Pacific (USARPAC)/Republic of Vietnam (RVN) from 9 September 1971 through 22 March 1972 * item 38 (Record of Assignments), he was assigned to duty in Vietnam with two units * Company H, 75th Rangers, 3rd...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002238
The evidence of record includes official orders confirming the applicant was awarded the ARCOM for meritorious service in the RVN from August 1971 to April 1972 and this award is not listed on his DD Form 214. As a result, it would be appropriate to award him the first award of the AGCM for his qualifying period of honorable service from 24 March 1971 through 22 March 1974 and correct his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005009
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 21 July 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090005009 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The evidence of record confirms the applicant was awarded the BSM for his meritorious service during the period November 1971 through May 1972, as evidenced by the BSM orders contained in his OMPF. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending item 24 of his DD Form 214, dated 25 May 1972, by...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004581
The applicant requests, in effect, that his 1 November 1974 DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) be corrected to reflect his service in the Republic of Korea (ROK) and the awards he is eligible for based on this service. The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows, in Item 31 (Foreign Service), that he served in the ROK from 4 November 1972 through 20 November 1973. The evidence of record confirms the applicant served in the ROK during the period 4...