BOARD DATE: 4 May 2011
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110004584
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests, in effect, correction of the effective date of his initial appointment to captain (CPT)/O-3 on National Guard Bureau (NGB) Special Orders Number 273 AR, dated 9 December 2010 to show he was extended Federal recognition on 19 August 2009 instead of 19 August 2010. He also requests correction of his record to show his unit vacancy promotion to major (MAJ)/O-4 was effective 19 August 2010. He further requests all back pay and allowances due as a result of these corrections.
2. He states that due to an administrative error his permanent Federal recognition orders do not have the correct effective date. His initial appointment in the New York Army National Guard (NYARNG) was effective 19 August 2009. Therefore, his temporary Federal recognition was valid for 1 year. However, a request for an initial appointment Federal recognition order was not submitted to the NGB until 23 August 2010, well after expiration of his temporary Federal recognition. On 9 December 2010, he received his initial appointment Federal recognition order from the NGB with an effective date of 19 August 2010 instead of 19 August 2009.
3. He provides copies of:
* an NGB 89 (Proceedings of a Federal Recognition Examining Board (FREB)), dated 19 August 2009
* orders appointing him as an officer in the NYARNG, effective 19 August 2009
* orders announcing extension of Federal recognition, effective 19 August 2010
* orders promoting him to MAJ, effective 18 August 2010
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant served as a commissioned officer in the Regular Army from 31 May 1997 until he was honorably released from active duty on 1 October 2006. He was promoted to captain (CPT)/O-3 on 1 December 2000.
2. Effective 19 August 2009, the applicant accepted appointment as a CPT in the NYARNG. On that date, he was considered by an FREB and the board recommended extending him Federal recognition.
3. Orders 258-1060, issued by the Office of the Adjutant General, State of New York, dated 15 September 2009, show the effective date of his appointment was 19 August 2009 and that he was granted temporary Federal recognition which would expire on 19 August 2010. However, a corrected copy of Orders 258-1060 changed his effective date of appointment to 19 August 2010.
4. On 19 August 2010, an FREB confirmed he was being promoted in an authorized position in the grade of MAJ and found him fully qualified for Federal recognition.
5. Orders 232-1004, issued by the Office of the Adjutant General, Joint Force Headquarters, Latham, NY, dated 20 August 2010, as amended by Orders
343-1045, issued by the same headquarters, dated 9 December 2010, promoted him to MAJ effective 19 August 2010. The orders stated he would not be paid in the new grade until Federal recognition was confirmed and his effective date of promotion would be the effective date on the permanent Federal recognition orders.
6. Special Orders Number 273 AR, issued by the NGB, dated 9 December 2010, announced extension of Federal recognition to the applicant in the grade of CPT effective 19 August 2010 for the purpose of initial appointment.
7. Special Orders Number 84 AR, issued by the NGB on 12 April 2011, announced extension of Federal recognition to him in the grade of MAJ effective 8 April 2011 for the purpose of promotion.
8. During the processing of this case, on 11 March 2011, an advisory opinion was obtained from the Chief, Personnel Policy Division, NGB. After careful review, the advisory official recommended approval of the applicant's request to adjust his initial appointment date to 19 August 2009, to have him go before a special selection board (SSB) for promotion to MAJ with an effective date of rank not to precede 19 August 2010, and to pay all back pay and allowances due as a result of the correction.
9. On 14 March 2011, a copy of the advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for information and to allow him the opportunity to submit comments or a rebuttal. He did not respond.
10. National Guard Regulation 600-100 (Commissioned Officers - Federal Recognition and Related Personnel Actions) provides procedures for processing all applications for Federal recognition.
a. Paragraph 2-1 states commissioned officers of the Army National Guard are appointed by the several States under Article 1, section 8 of the U. S. Constitution. These appointments may be federally recognized by the Chief, NGB under such regulations as the Secretary of the Army may prescribe and under the provisions of this regulation. Officers who are federally recognized in a particular grade and branch shall be tendered an appointment in the same grade as Reserve commissioned officers of the Army with assignment to the Army National Guard of the United States if they have not already accepted such appointment.
b. Paragraph 2-2 states the effective date of Federal recognition for original appointment is that date on which the commissioned officer executes the oaths of office in the State. Paragraph 2-3a states temporary Federal recognition upon initial appointment establishes the authorized grade to be used by all officers in their federally recognized status.
c. Paragraph 2-13 states temporary Federal recognition may be extended to an officer who has been appointed in the Army National Guard of a State and found to be qualified by an FREB pending final determination of eligibility and appointment as a Reserve commissioned officer of the Army. If not sooner withdrawn or replaced by the granting of permanent Federal recognition, temporary Federal recognition will automatically terminate 6 months after the effective date of State appointment. The National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal year 2008 extended the maximum period of temporary Federal recognition to 1 year.
d. Paragraph 10-15b states temporary Federal recognition may be granted by an FREB to those eligible when the board finds that the member has successfully passed the examination prescribed herein, has subscribed to the oaths of office, and has been appointed by a State order for assignment to a position vacancy in a federally recognized unit of the Army National Guard. The FREB will forward the NGB Form 89 and allied documents to The Adjutant General. When the member is favorably recommended, The Adjutant General will endorse the packet to the NGB. If the member meets the qualifications and requirements for Federal recognition, the Chief, NGB extends permanent Federal recognition to the member in the grade and branch in which the member is qualified.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The evidence shows the applicant was selected for promotion to MAJ and he was found to be fully qualified for Federal recognition in that grade. He was duly promoted to MAJ by the NYARNG effective 19 August 2010.
2. Orders in his record show he did not receive permanent Federal recognition for his initial appointment as a CPT until 19 August 2010, a full year after an FREB recommended such recognition. Considering the NYARNG attempted to promote him to MAJ to fill a unit vacancy on 19 August 2010 when he had not yet received permanent Federal recognition as a CPT, it appears an administrative error caused the delay.
3. Notwithstanding the NGB advisory opinion, in this case it would be appropriate to correct his record to show:
* he received permanent Federal recognition in the grade of CPT effective 19 August 2009
* he was promoted to MAJ effective 19 August 2010 with a date of rank of 19 August 2010
* he received permanent Federal recognition in the grade of MAJ effective 19 August 2010
4. He should also receive all back pay and allowances he is due as a result of these corrections
BOARD VOTE:
___x____ ___x_____ ____x__ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all state Army National Guard records and the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:
* showing he received permanent Federal recognition in the grade of CPT effective 19 August 2009
* showing he was promoted to MAJ effective 19 August 2010
* showing his date of rank for MAJ is 19 August 2010
* showing he received permanent Federal recognition in the grade of MAJ effective 19 August 2010
* paying him all back pay and allowances due as a result of these corrections
_________x_____________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110004584
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110004584
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004380
He needs a Federal Recognition date for MAJ of 8 July 2008. Special Order A-654, dated 11 September 2006, promoted the applicant to MAJ in the PAARNG effective upon extension of Federal recognition. As a result, the Board recommends that the State Army National Guard records and the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the applicant was appointed in the PAARNG and extended permanent Federal recognition as a major effective 8 July 2008.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009153
Having had prior enlisted service, the applicant's record shows he submitted an NGB Form 62 (Application for Federal Recognition as an Army National Guard Officer) and he executed an oath of office on 15 May 2009. However, his records do not show he was granted Federal recognition for this initial appointment. National Guard Regulation 600-100 (Commissioned Officers - Federal Recognition and Related Personnel Actions) provides procedures for processing applications for Federal recognition.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022918
The applicant provides: * two NGB Forms 89 * two appointment orders * two NGB Forms 337 (Oaths of Office) * NGB Form 62E (Application for Federal Recognition as an ARNG Officer or Warrant Officer and Appointment as a Reserve Commissioned Officer or Warrant Officer of the Army in the ARNG of the United States) * NGB Special Orders CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. On 19 July 2012, the applicant completed an NGB Form 62E requesting Federal recognition as a CPT with appointment as a Reserve...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022535
The applicant states: * he was commissioned through the State Officer Candidate School (OCS) on 25 August 2009 * his NGB Form 0122E (Special Orders Number 255 AR), dated 19 October 2011, shows his initial appointment effective date as 4 March 2011 * his Federal Recognition packet was never submitted to the National Guard Bureau (NGB); therefore he was not given his Federal Recognition * 16 months after asking about his promotion to first lieutenant (1LT), he discovered he had never received...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012870
An NGB 337, dated 2 October 2009, shows he was commissioned a CPT in the SCARNG and granted temporary Federal recognition on 2 October 2009. Therefore, his record should be corrected to show he received successive additional periods of extension of temporary Federal recognition and amend NGB Federal Recognition Special Orders Number 57 AR, dated 22 February 2013, to show he was extended Federal recognition in the rank of CPT effective 2 October 2009 for initial appointment. As a result,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120016873
On 17 March 2008, a FedRec Examining Board (FREB) found him qualified for appointment and FedRec in the rank of MAJ, Quartermaster (QM) Corps, in the IAARNG, with an effective date of 23 October 2008. National Guard Regulation 600-100 (Personnel - General, Commissioned Officers Federal Recognition and Related Personnel Actions), paragraph 2-4b, states the effective date of FedRec for original appointment is that date on which the officer executes the oath of office in the State. As a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016800
The applicant provides two NGB Forms 337 (Oaths of Office), two NGB Forms 89 (Proceedings of a Federal Recognition Examining Board (FREB)), discharge and appointment orders, and NGB Special Orders Number 107 AR [Federal recognition orders]. National Guard Regulation 600-101 (Warrant Officers - Federal Recognition and Related Personnel Actions) provides procedures for processing all applications for Federal recognition and states in: a. paragraph 2-2 the appointment of warrant officers is a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006794
The advisory official indicated the NGB recommended disapproval of the applicant's request to have his CPT DOR changed from 21 December 2006 to 12 July 2006 because his promotion was based on a position vacancy. This recommendation was based on the promotion regulatory guidance contained in the Reserve Officer Personnel Management Act (ROPMA) for position vacancy promotions which provides that the effective date of an ARNG commissioned officer who is promoted in the State under the position...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005214
Temporary Federal recognition may be extended to an officer who has been appointed in the ARNG of a State and found to be qualified by a Federal Recognition Board pending final determination of eligibility and appointment as a Reserve commissioned officer of the Army. Records show the applicant was granted temporary Federal recognition effective 20 March 2009 upon his initial appointment in the NYARNG as a 2LT. As a result, the Board recommends that the State Army National Guard records...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022677
The applicant requests: * correction of the date he was granted Federal recognition from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) to the Puerto Rico Army National Guard (PRARNG) * consideration by a mandatory promotion board under the fiscal year 2012 (FY12) criteria 2. The applicant states: * he was promoted to captain (CPT) on 15 August 2005 and reached his maximum years of service (7 years) for promotion consideration to major (MAJ) in August 2012 * his promotion packet was not submitted on time due...