Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004543
Original file (20110004543.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		

		BOARD DATE:	  27 September 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110004543 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he was separated on 16 June 2009 and retired by reason of permanent disability.

2.  The applicant states his DD Form 214 shows he served on active duty from 3 March 2003 to 13 July 2004.  However, he was placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) with a 40-percent disability rating on 22 October 2007 and he was removed from the TDRL and was permanently retired with a 60-percent disability rating on 16 June 2009.  He further states his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show continuous duty from 3 March 2003 until he was permanently retired on 16 June 2009.

3.  The applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214; his TDRL orders; his permanent retirement orders; a memorandum regarding anticipated referral to a physical evaluation board (PEB), dated 16 November 2006; and his military identification card.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant's records, though somewhat incomplete, show he was serving in the U.S. Army Reserve in pay grade E-4 when he was ordered to active duty in support of Operation Enduring Freedom on 3 March 2003 at Fort Eustis, Virginia.

2.  His DD Form 214 shows he deployed to Kuwait and Iraq from 27 April 2003 to 16 May 2004.  On 13 July 2004, he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) due to completion of required service.  His chronological statement of retirement points shows that he never served on active duty after this date except for two days during retirement year ending 25 October 2006.

3.  On 23 August 2007, a PEB convened at Fort Sam Houston, Texas, and determined the applicant was unfit for service and recommended his placement on the TDRL with a 40-percent disability rating.  Accordingly, he was placed on the TDRL effective 22 October 2007.

4.  On 16 June 2009, he was removed from the TDRL and permanently retired with a 60-percent disability rating effective 17 June 2009.

5.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) serves as the authority for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It provides that the DD Form 214 is a summary of the Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.  Service on the TDRL is not creditable active service.  The DD Form 214 is not intended to have any legal effect on the termination of a Soldier's service.  A DD Form 214 will not be prepared for Soldiers removed from the TDRL and changes to a DD Form 214 will not be made retroactively unless the event occurred during the period covered by the DD Form 214.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that his DD Form 214 should show he was separated on 16 June 2009 and retired by reason of permanent disability has been noted and was found to lack merit.  Except for two days, the applicant was not serving on active duty from the time of his REFRAD on 13 July 2004 until he was placed on the TDRL or until he was permanently retired and thus is not entitled to have his DD Form 214 corrected to grant him credit for service not performed.

2.  Service on the TDRL is not creditable active service and the applicable regulation specifically directs that a DD Form 214 will not be issued upon removal from the TDRL.

3.  While it is understood why the applicant desires a new or corrected DD Form 214, his orders removing him from the TDRL and permanently retiring him serve as his separation document for verification proposes.



BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x__  ____x____  ____x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to the United States during the Global War on Terrorism.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.



      __________x_______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110004543



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110004543



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016119

    Original file (20130016119.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 20 May 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130016119 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant's last period of active service was from 10 February 2003 to 18 April 2004. He did not serve on active duty beyond this date; therefore, he was not issued a DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008962

    Original file (20090008962.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) that was issued on 2 June 2003 be changed to show that he was retired due to permanent physical disability and that item 18 (Remarks) of this document be corrected to show that he was awarded an 80-percent disability rating from the Army. He also states that the USAPDA told him that he had to make a request through the Army Board for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150007033

    Original file (20150007033.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * his previous request to the Board resulted in overturning the May 2008 physical evaluation board (PEB) decision and placing him on the TDRL effective 23 September 2008, which needs further correcting to show the effective date as 31 December 2008 * he originally out-processed from the Army on 31 December 2008 * Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) calculations show he ought to have those extra days from 23 September 2008 through 31 December 2008 added to his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013155

    Original file (20130013155.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1372 (Grade on Retirement Physical Disability, Members of the Armed Forces), states that unless entitled to a higher retired grade under some other provision of law, any member of an Armed Force who is retired for physical disability under section 1201 or 1204 of this title, or whose name is placed on the TDRL under section 1202 or 1205 of this title, is entitled to the grade equivalent to the highest of the following: * the grade or rank in which he is serving...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001118

    Original file (20090001118.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show that he was permanently retired by reason of disability. It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge. At the time the applicant was removed from the TDRL and was retired by reason of permanent disability, he was not on active duty and thus was not entitled to receive another DD Form 214 or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015075

    Original file (20090015075.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    When placed on the TDRL, the FEV-1 was 64.9 percent. Records show that on 19 December 2004 and 19 September 2006, the DVA reviewed the applicant's medical condition and continued its noncompensable disability rating of 0 percent. Based on those findings he was appropriate rated at 10 percent.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040008724C070208

    Original file (20040008724C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 9 August 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20040008724 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The evidence shows that the applicant received the findings and recommendations of the 22 August 2003 examination and the name and phone number of the PEBLO. The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018741

    Original file (20090018741.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). A DD Form 214 was issued at the time the applicant was retired from active duty on 24 December 2004. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding the statement "SERVICE IN AFGHANISTAN FROM 20031017-20031215” to item 18 of his DD Form 214 issued in 2004.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016839

    Original file (20080016839.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Counsel states the applicant believes that in accordance with the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities he is between 30 percent and 60 percent disabled due to lung problems. Counsel states the applicant was denied due process for the following reasons: a. he did not receive any orders to report for a military physical examination prior to being removed from the TDRL; b. he did not receive a copy of any physical examinations relating to his pneumothorax and surgery; c. he was not properly...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024907

    Original file (20100024907.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He states he/the: * was retired for disability with eligibility to CRDP under Title 10, U.S. Code * Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) fails to pay him CRDP because it incorrectly computed his retirement status and eligibility * previously applied to this Board for correction of his discharge to show that he was placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL), effective 16 October 2004 * is currently receiving 100 percent (%) disability compensation from the Department of...