Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004305
Original file (20110004305.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		

		BOARD DATE:	  6 September 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110004305 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show that his character of service was “honorable.”

2.  The applicant states that his DD Form 214 shows his service was uncharacterized and he desires it to reflect that it was “Honorable” because it inhibits his ability to utilize his veteran's benefits.

3.  The applicant provides a letter explaining his application, his DD Form 214, an Honorable Discharge Certificate, and his Chronological Statement of Retirement Points.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  The applicant enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) in Dallas, Texas on 19 June 1991 for a period of 8 years.  He was ordered to initial active duty for training (IADT) on 4 June 1992 and was transferred to Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri to undergo one-station unit training as a carpenter and masonry specialist.

3.  He completed his training and was released from active duty training on 1 October 1992 due to completion of active duty training.  He had served 3 months and 28 days of active service that is uncharacterized. 

4.  He was returned to his USAR unit in Texas and he continued to serve in the USAR until he was honorably discharged on 23 June 1999.

5.  Army Regulation 635-200 provides the policies and procedures for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Paragraph 4-2, in effect at the time, provides in pertinent part that Army National Guard and USAR Soldiers who successfully complete a period of IADT while in an entry level status will have uncharacterized service even though they completed their IADT successfully.  

6.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It establishes standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214 and states that the DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant was properly released from IADT with uncharacterized service in accordance with the applicable regulation in effect at the time.  

2.  While the applicant’s request is understandable, a duly-constituted and properly prepared DD Form 214 is not changed simply to qualify an individual for benefits.  

3.  An uncharacterized discharge is not meant to be a negative reflection of a Soldier's military service.  It merely means the Soldier has not been in the Army long enough for his or her character of service to be rated as honorable or otherwise.

4.  Accordingly, there appears to be no basis to grant his request.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x___  __x______  ____x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to the United States.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.




      _______ _x   _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110004305



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110004305



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011433

    Original file (20140011433.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), ending on 12 May 1990, to show in: * Item 4a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) - private first class (PFC) * Item 4b (Pay Grade) - E-3 * Items 12a-e (Record of Service) - Reserve Officers Training Corps (ROTC) service credit * Item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbon Awarded or Authorized) - Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge * Item 14 (Military...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000626

    Original file (20090000626.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He claims that prior to his 16 August 1991 REFRAD, he had been issued five other separation documents, which characterized his service as “Honorable” and that he had continuously served in an active status in either the United States Army Reserve (USAR) or Army National Guard (ARNG), in both a commissioned and enlisted status, from 9 November 1976 through his placement on the Retired List on 7 July 1994, with no break in service. The DD Form 214 he was issued for this period of active duty...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006154

    Original file (20130006154.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests: * an upgrade of his uncharacterized discharge from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) to an honorable discharge * the issuance of a DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) 2. Active Army Soldiers on termination of active duty by reason of administrative separation (including separation by reason of retirement or expiration of term of service), physical disability separation, or punitive discharge under the Uniform Code of Military Justice; b. RC...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000887

    Original file (20100000887.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to reflect the correct time in service and character of service. The DD Form 214 he was issued shows he was released from ADT under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 4, by reason of expiration term of service, with an uncharacterized character of service. The DD Form 214 will be prepared for selected Soldiers, among which...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006003

    Original file (20090006003.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 17 September 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090006003 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that his period of initial active duty for training (IADT) be characterized to show he was honorably discharged. Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations) provides the following: a. only an honorable characterization of service may be awarded to a Soldier upon completion of his period of enlistment or period for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011625

    Original file (20130011625.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Her DD Form 214 shows her: * type for separation - release from active duty training * characterization of service - uncharacterized * narrative reason for separation - completion of required active service. c. Paragraph 3–9 (Uncharacterized Separations) states a separation will be described as entry-level with service uncharacterized if separation processing is initiated while a Soldier is in entry-level status, except when: (1) characterization under other than honorable conditions is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100030310

    Original file (20100030310.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the widow of the deceased former service member (FSM), requests the characterization of her husband's active service for initial active duty for training (IADT), completed on 17 September 1992, be changed to honorable. Because the FSM was in an entry-level status at the time of his release from active duty, his period of active service was properly determined to be uncharacterized in accordance with the regulation in effect at the time. Therefore, the Board determined that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004909

    Original file (20130004909.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that the characterization of service on her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 12 September 1992 be changed to show "honorable" service instead of "uncharacterized" service. The separation code on her DD Form 214 insinuates her service was questionable or negative and this most certainly was not the case. Paragraph 4-2h of Army Regulation 635-200, in effect at the time, provided that Army National Guard of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016457

    Original file (20110016457.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests change of his uncharacterized entry level status separation to show that he was honorably discharged by reason of physical disability. The applicant provides a copy of: * his discharge orders * his initial active duty for training orders * his admission to the hospital on 15 June 1992 * an Individual Sick Slip * memoranda from his unit * a DA Form 2173 (Statement of Medical Examination and Duty Status) * his Leave and Earnings Statement (LES) for the period 1-30 June...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017415

    Original file (20130017415.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Only the honorable characterization may be awarded a Soldier upon completion of his/her period of enlistment or period for which called or ordered to active duty or active duty for training, or where required under specific reasons for separation, unless an entry-level status separation (uncharacterized) is warranted. He served on active duty for a period of 140 days; therefore, he was still in an entry-level status at the time of release. The applicant was honorably discharged from the...