Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004003
Original file (20110004003.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  6 September 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110004003 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her husband, a deceased former service member (FSM), be corrected to reflect a medical discharge versus an under honorable conditions discharge.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, the FSM returned from Vietnam addicted to heroin and was diagnosed with drug dependency and chronic undifferentiated schizophrenia. 

3.  The applicant provides:

* DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge)
* copy of Death Certificate
* Certificate of Prison Discharge
* 21 pages of the FSM's medical history

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, and has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The FSM was inducted into the Army of the United States on 29 January 1970.  He completed basic combat and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 64A (Light Vehicle Driver).  He also served in MOS 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman).  The highest rank he attained was private first class (PFC)/E-3.

3.  Records show the applicant received nonjudicial punishment under the provisions of Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) on          22 October 1970, for disobeying orders and striking a superior.

4.  Record show the applicant went AWOL on 7 September 1971 and he was dropped from Army rolls on 6 October 1971 and reported in a desertion status.

5.  Clinical records show that on 7 November 1971 the FSM was admitted to the hospital after applying for amnesty in Vietnam.  Clinical records state the FSM used heroin intravenously while in Vietnam.  He was diagnosed with drug dependency due to being on heroin, chronic undifferentiated schizophrenia manifested with auditory hallucinations, chronic anxiety, and minor thought disorder which was characterized by loose associations.

6.  Medical records state the FSM's medical condition was not considered to be in the line of duty and his condition was due to his own misconduct. 

7.  On 16 November 1971, the FSM was released from active duty under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Enlisted Separations), chapter 5, and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) with a general discharge.  His DD Form 214 also shows the applicant was a "member of a medical holding detachment or units who, upon completion of hospitalization, do not, intend to immediate reenlist or reenlistment in the Regular Army."

8.  Orders, dated 17 November 1971, indicate the FSM appeared before a Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) and he was reassigned to a Veterans Administration (VA) Hospital, Atlanta, GA, effective the same date, to await further orders in connection with PEB proceedings.  The results of the PEB are not available for review in this case.

9.  On 23 December 1975, the FSM received a general discharge from the USAR with an effective date of 1 January 1976.  The reason for the discharge was expiration term of service (ETS).

10.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic policy for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Paragraph 5-19 provides that commanders are authorized to order enlisted personnel not serving in a Reserve status, for separation for the convenience of the Government.  Enlisted personnel will be separated and ordered to active duty for training under the Reserve Enlistment Program of 1963 and assigned to medical holding detachments.  Any enlisted person assigned to a medical holding detachment who signifies he does not intend to reenlist may be separated upon completion of hospitalization provided he has less than three months prior to ETS.  The SPN code of 412 for separation will be included in directives or orders directing individuals to report to the appropriate transfer activity for discharge or release from active duty as appropriate.

11.  Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.  When 
authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.  A characterization of under honorable conditions may be issued only when the reason for the Soldier's separation specifically allows such characterization.

12.  Army Regulation 635-40 governs the evaluation of physical fitness of Soldiers who may be unfit to perform their military duties because of physical disability.  Under the laws governing the Army Physical Disability Evaluation system, Soldiers who sustain or aggravate physically unfitting disabilities must meet several line of duty criteria to be eligible to receive retirement and severance pay benefits.  The disability must have been incurred or aggravated while the Soldier was entitled to basic pay or was the proximate cause of performing active duty or inactive duty training.  The disability must not have resulted from the Soldier’s intentional misconduct or willful neglect.  The disability must not have been incurred during a period of unauthorized absence.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's request that the FSM's DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect a medical discharge versus a general discharge was carefully considered and determined to lack merit.

2.  The available evidence shows the FSM underwent a PEB for drug dependency due to heroin use, chronic undifferentiated schizophrenia manifested with auditory hallucinations, chronic anxiety, and minor thought disorder which was characterized by loose associations.  The results of the PEB are not available for review.  However, the applicant was discharged due to ETS.  It is reasonable to conclude the PEB found the FSM's condition was a result of his heroin use.

3.  Records clearly show the FSM was treated for heroin dependency and suffered medical issues as a result of illegal drug use.  However, these self-inflicted medical conditions do not warrant a medical discharge because they were not incurred in the line of duty.

4.  Based on the foregoing, there is insufficient evidence to grant the applicant's request to amend the FSM's records to show he was medically discharged.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned




      _____________X____________
       	     CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110004003



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110004003



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050009568C070206

    Original file (20050009568C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his administrative discharge be changed to a medical separation. Counsel states the applicant's medical records show no psychiatric complaints until shortly before his expiration term of service (ETS) during his first enlistment. diagnosed him with Schizoid Personality manifested by social isolation and withdrawn behavior and recommended discharge under chapter 13 [Army Regulation 635-200] as unsuitable because of a character and behavior disorder.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009003

    Original file (20120009003.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The military physician determined he was medically unfit according to Army Regulation 40-501 (Standards of Medical Fitness) and recommended entering him into the physical disability evaluation system (PDES). He was rated under the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) codes 9299 and 9210 and granted a zero-percent (0%) disability rating. Here, the PEB did so and rated his condition 0% disabling.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001796

    Original file (20110001796.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 21 July 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110001796 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he was medically retired by a reason other than schizophrenia. On 13 January 1976, a medical evaluation board (MEB) convened at WRAMC and after consideration of clinical records, laboratory findings, and physical examinations, the MEB found that the applicant was diagnosed as having the medical conditions...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00311

    Original file (PD2011-00311.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    The examiner stated, “he is employable from a psychiatric standpoint and will do best in settings in which he has little or no contact with the public and very loose supervision secondary to his posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms.” The examiner applied the §4.130 30% language, stating the CI’s psychiatric symptoms caused “occasional decrease in work efficiency and intermittent periods of inability to perform occupational tasks….” The VA rated the CI’s PTSD at 30%, citing this exam and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010568

    Original file (20120010568.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation) establishes the Army Physical Disability Evaluation System and sets forth policies, responsibilities, and procedures that apply in determining whether a Soldier is unfit because of physical disability to reasonably perform the duties of his or her office, grade, rank, or rating. Once a determination of physical unfitness is made, the physical evaluation board rates all disabilities using the VA Schedule...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01572

    Original file (PD2012 01572.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The examiner further opined that the CI had severe military and civilian impairment and that without therapy or medication, the probability for his continued mental deterioration was “extremely high” and that even with ongoing treatment theprognosis was “still guarded.” He also stated the CI’s mental illness was severe, chronic, and unfitting and he highly recommended the CI initiate psychotherapy and medication at the VA.The C&P examination approximately 4 monthsafter permanent separation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020504

    Original file (20110020504.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) * Army Board for Correction Military Records (ABCMR) Record of Proceedings Docket Number AR20100022702, dated 29 March 2011 * VA Rating Decision, dated 8 September 2011 * certificate from the VA, dated 10 September 2011 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The VA Winston-Salem Regional Office transmittal letter, dated 10 August 2010, shows his service-connected disability rating of 100 percent for paranoid-type...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040011498C070208

    Original file (20040011498C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that, upon removal from the temporary disability retired list (TDRL), the record be changed to show that the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB), dated 6 October 2004, recommended a combined rating of 30 percent and that he was placed on the Retired List due to disability. U.S. Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) Orders D292-06, dated 18 October 2004, notified the applicant that he was removed from the TDRL and discharged from the service effective 18...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019809

    Original file (20100019809.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant reported he might be AWOL, but it was because he was hospitalized at the Jackson VA Hospital for 30 days. The medical records were provided by the applicant's counsel to show the hospitalization locations, dates, diagnosis, and attending physicians. location date diagnosis/attending physician 130th Station Hospital Germany 1-14 May 1974 chronic undifferentiated schizophrenia (Dr. C____) Brooke Army Medical Center 16 May-5 June 1974 acute moderate undifferentiated...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070011997

    Original file (20070011997.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides a copy of his VA Rating Decision, dated 26 June 2007, which shows that he was granted a 100 percent service connected disability, for, in effect, schizophrenia. Paragraph 7-20, PEB processing, states, in pertinent part, that if the PEB recommends removal from the TDRL, the PEB will forward to the Soldier a DA Form 199 (PEB Proceedings) and letter of explanation by certified mail, restricted delivery, return receipt requested. The Army must find that a service member...