Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003817
Original file (20110003817.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  8 September 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110003817 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) to show award of the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC) for actions between 27 November and
11 December 1950.

2.  The applicant states the PUC was not put on his DD Form 214.

3.  The applicant does not provide any evidence in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.


2.  The applicant's military record is not available for review.  A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members’ records at the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC) in 1973.  It is believed that the applicant's records were lost or destroyed in that fire.  However, there were sufficient documents available to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case.  This case is being considered using reconstructed records which primarily consist of the applicant's 
DD Form 214 and other documents provided by the NPRC.

3.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 21 January 1949 for a period of 3 years.  He was honorably discharged on 3 June 1952 at the expiration of his term of service.  The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time shows in:

	a.  item 24 (Total Net Service Completed for Pay Purposes) he completed
3 years, 4 months, and 14 days of total service;

	b.  item 26 (Foreign and/or Sea Service) he completed 1 year of foreign service;

	c.  Item 27 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) the Korean Service Medal with four bronze service stars;

	d.  item 28 (Most Significant Duty Assignment) the 10th Reconnaissance, Company, 10th Infantry Division, Fort Riley, KS.

4.  The available record contains a WD AGO Form 8-231 (Dispensary Request for Consultation), dated 13 June 1950, that shows the applicant's unit of assignment as C Battery, 14th Armored Field Artillery (AFA) Battalion.

5.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-1 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) was published to assist commanders and personnel officers in determining or establishing the eligibility of individual members for campaign participation credit, assault landing credit, unit citation emblems, and occupation duty credit for World War II and for the Korean War.  This pamphlet shows the 14th Armored Field Artillery Battalion, 2nd Armored Division, was cited for award of the Distinguished Unit Citation (now known as the Presidential Unit Citation) for the period 25 July through 16 August 1944 by War Department General Orders Number 108, dated 1945.

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Presidential Unit Citation is awarded for extraordinary heroism, gallantry, determination, and esprit de corps in action.
7.  Army Regulation 670-1 (Wear and Appearance of Army Uniforms and Insignia) states unit awards are authorized for permanent wear by an individual who was assigned and present for duty with the unit at any time during the period cited or who was attached to and present for duty with the unit for at least
30 consecutive days of the period cited.  It further states an individual who was not present with a unit during the period cited for permanent wear of a unit award may be authorized temporary wear only for the duration of assignment to the unit.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's request for correction of his record to show award of the Presidential Unit Citation was carefully considered.

2.  The applicant's unit in fact was cited for award of the redesignated Presidential Unit Citation; however, he was not assigned to the unit during the period for which it was cited.  Therefore, he is not entitled to permanent wear or correction of his DD Form 214 to show this unit award.

3.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

4.  This action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to our Nation.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case 


are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________X___________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110003817



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110003817



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011639

    Original file (20110011639.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states the 101st Airborne Division was awarded the PUC during World War II and that it was passed on to him because he was in the unit. Evidence shows his unit was cited for award of the PUC from 2 June to 20 June 1966. ____________X__________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018787

    Original file (20080018787.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states although a fire destroyed most of the FSM's military records, he retrieved data from regimental websites that the FSM served with and determined that he was entitled to the following unit awards: a. one PUC and one Philippine Republic PUC from his service with the 1st Infantry Regiment, 6th Infantry Division; b. three PUCs, one Philippine Republic PUC, and one Republic of Korea PUC from his service with the 19th Infantry Regiment, 24th Infantry Division; and c. five...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120019926

    Original file (20120019926.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military service records are not available to the Board for review. Based on the available evidence, a calculation of the approximate period of his service in Korea shows the following: 1951 01 02 approximate date of deployment to Korea + 0 11 24 total foreign service (from DD Form 214) = 1951 12 26 or 26 December 1951 - date returned to United States c. Thus, based on the available evidence, it is reasonable to conclude that the applicant served in Korea from 2 January 1951...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013738

    Original file (20110013738.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show award of the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC) and the Belgian Croix de Guerre. c. Item 33 (Decorations and Citations) he was awarded the: * Distinguished Unit Badge (DUC) (now known as the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC)) * Good Conduct Medal * Purple Heart with Oak Leaf Cluster * World War II Victory Medal * American theater Service Medal (now known as the American Defense Service Medal) * European, African, Middle-Eastern...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020416

    Original file (20090020416.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests a. reconsideration of his previous application for correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) to show award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM), and b. correction of his record to show award of the Distinguished Unit Citation [now known as the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC)]. In the absence of evidence showing he was assigned to HHB, 2d Infantry Division Artillery during the period for which the unit was awarded...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002034

    Original file (20140002034.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides a two-page statement explaining his application, copies of orders assigning him to the 3rd Armored Division, a verification of his tour in SWA, orders assigning him to Fort Sill, a hand receipt for issue of a PUC, DD Form 214, orders awarding him the ARCOM, a certificate of commendation, orders awarding him the AAM, a certificate awarding him another AAM (absent orders), and an awards chart indicating awards he has and awards he believes he is entitled to receive. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027375

    Original file (20100027375.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). A review of the Army Human Resources Command, Military Awards Branch index of general orders failed to reveal orders awarding the 3rd Armored Cavalry Regiment the PUC during OIF. The evidence of record does not show the applicant's unit, the 3rd Armored Cavalry Regiment, was awarded the PUC during his period of service in Iraq.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018661

    Original file (20100018661.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The pamphlet does not show his unit was awarded the PUC or MUC during his period of service. The evidence of record does not support the applicant's request for correction of his record to show the PUC, MUC, or CAB. __________X______________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002841

    Original file (20140002841.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He states that his DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the Army of Occupation Medal (AOM) and the Korean Service Medal (KSM). The applicant's complete military record is not available to the Board for review. There is no evidence of record that shows the applicant's unit was awarded the ROK PUC.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015432

    Original file (20130015432.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 27 of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows he earned the following awards: * Korean Service Medal with 2 bronze service stars * United Nations Service Medal 6. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes Army policy and criteria concerning individual military awards. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st award) for the period 8 January 1951 through 8...