Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003595
Original file (20110003595.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  25 August 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110003595 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show he received a reentry (RE) code of "1." 

2.  The applicant states he was mistakenly marked absent without leave (AWOL) and his room cleared without notice.  Further, at the time of his discharge he was only 17 and had poor judgment about how and when to approach his chain of command.  He believes he can be a great asset to the U.S. military.

3.  The applicant provides no additional evidence.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 25 August 2009 at the age of 17.  The highest rank/grade he attained during his enlistment was private/pay grade E-2.  

3.  The commander's report contained in his separation packet shows a disciplinary history that includes numerous adverse counseling sessions for committing the following offenses:

* failure to report to Physical Training formation
* failure to report to extra duty
* accountability formation
* disobeying a lawful order
* disobeying a direct order of an acting Noncommissioned Officer
* disobeying a Commissioned Officer
* wrongful wear of improper insignia on uniform
* Separation from service 

4.  His disciplinary history also includes acceptance of nonjudicial punishment under the provisions of Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) on two occasions for:

* wrongfully and willfully impersonating a noncommissioned officer and wearing unauthorized insignia on his uniform 
* failing to go at the time prescribed to his appointed place of duty on 
21 June 2010 and 9 July 2010

5.  He was reported AWOL from 26 June to 28 June 2010.

6.  On an unknown date, the applicant's unit commander notified him he was initiating action which could result in his separation from the Army with a general discharge under honorable conditions under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), paragraph 14-12b, for a pattern of misconduct.  He stated the applicant impersonated a noncommissioned officer of the U.S. Army by wearing the rank insignia of a sergeant and a combat insignia of the 1st Cavalry Division; failed to report to appointed place on two occasions, and was AWOL for 3 days.

7.  He was advised of his rights and the impact of the discharge.  He accepted his right to consult with legal counsel and submitted a statement in his own behalf, but waived consideration of his case by or personal appearance before an administrative separation board.  He acknowledged he understood that if his discharge request were approved, he could be deprived of many or all Army benefits, that he could be ineligible for many or all benefits administered by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), that he could be deprived of his rights and benefits as a veteran under both Federal and State laws, and that he could expect to encounter substantial prejudice in civilian life.  The applicant waived submitting statements or evidence in his own defense.

8.  On an unknown date, the unit commander recommended that he be separated from the service and that further rehabilitative efforts be waived.  The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general discharge under honorable conditions.

9.  The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12b, and that he be furnished a general under honorable conditions characterization of service.

10.  On 13 August 2010, he was discharged accordingly.  His DD Form 214 shows:

* his service was characterized as under honorable conditions (general)
* he was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12b, with an SPD code of JKA and an RE code of 3
* his narrative reason for separation was "pattern of misconduct"

11.  Army Regulation 635-200 states that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge.  Army Regulation 601-210 (Regular Army and Army Reserve Enlistment Program) establishes eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing into the Regular Army and the U.S. Army Reserve.  Table 3-6 includes a list of the Regular Army RE codes:

	a.  RE-1 applies to Soldiers completing their term of active service who are considered qualified to reenter the U.S. Army.  They are qualified for enlistment if all other criteria are met.

	b.  RE-3 applies to Soldiers who are not considered fully qualified for reentry or continuous service at the time of separation, but the disqualification is waiverable.  They are ineligible unless a waiver is granted. 

12.  The Separation Program Designator (SPD) Code/RE Code Cross-Reference Table, dated October 2000, shows an RE code of "3" is the appropriate code to assign for the SPD code of "JKA."

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1.  The applicant request his RE code be changed to RE-1.

2.  The applicant contends he was mistakenly reported AWOL; however, there is no evidence in the record to support his contention.  Further, he contends he was young and immature at the time he committed the offenses and did not know how to approach his chain of command.  His record shows he was 17 years of age at the time of enlistment and 18 years of age at the time of his discharge.  The fact that he was young is not in question; however, there is no evidence indicating he was any less mature than other Soldiers of the same age who successfully completed their military service obligation.

3.  The evidence of record shows he was separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 due to misconduct.  An RE code of 3 is the appropriate code to assign individuals who are assigned an SPD code of "JKA" due to misconduct.

4.  The available evidence shows he was properly and equitably discharged in accordance with the regulations in effect at the time.  There is no indication of procedural errors which would have jeopardized his rights.  All requirements of law and regulation were met, and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.  Further, his discharge accurately reflects his overall record of service.

5.  In view of the above, his request should be denied.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X___  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _ X____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110003595





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110003595



5


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130002062

    Original file (AR20130002062.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests an upgrade of his discharge from general, under honorable conditions to honorable and a change of the narrative reason for separation to include the reentry eligibility (RE) code to 1. On 16 April 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the specific...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100009716

    Original file (AR20100009716.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 8 July 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconduct. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA Legend: AWOL Absent Without...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013656

    Original file (20130013656.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests his general discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge and his reentry eligibility (RE) code be changed from RE-3 to a more favorable code. Army Regulation 635-200 further states that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. It states that the SPD code of JKA is the appropriate code to assign to Soldiers separated under the provisions of Army Regulation...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130001312

    Original file (AR20130001312.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 25 October 2010, the separation authority directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Twenty-four negative counseling statements that are dated between 11 February 2010 and 31 August 2010, which include, failing to report to duty on time (multiple times), failing to maintain finances, being late for work, wearing PT uniform improperly, lying to a commissioned officer, lying to a NCO, knowingly operating a motor vehicle...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026461

    Original file (20100026461.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (SPD Codes) provides the specific authorities and reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. a. The applicant has not provided any documentary evidence showing his discharge action was in error or is unjust.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100015862

    Original file (AR20100015862.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, the separation authority approved the applicant's discharge under the provisions of Chapter 14, Paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconduct, which the separation code is "JKA." Yes No Counsel: NA Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293, discharge order, dated 23 November 2009, Enlisted Record Brief, and DD Form 214 for the period of service under review. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100007603

    Original file (AR20100007603.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 1 June 1998, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of a pattern of misconduct; in that he received an Article 15 for AWOL, had several FTR's, received letters of indebtedness, failed the APFT and disobeyed numerous orders, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The narrative reason specified...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012035

    Original file (20100012035.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his reentry eligibility (RE) code to a code that will allow him to enlist. The applicant contends that his RE code should be changed to a code that will allow him to reenter the military.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130007983

    Original file (AR20130007983.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The applicant's record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army on 2 May 2005 and on 23 October 2007 he reenlisted for a period of 6 years. On 8 September 2010, the separation authority, waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The applicant was separated on 25 September 2010, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 14-12b for a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002144

    Original file (20120002144.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show item 27 (Reentry (RE) Code) as something other than "4." The "JKA" SPD code is the code for Soldiers separating under Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12b, by reason of a pattern of misconduct. The evidence of record shows the applicant was approved for discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12b, by reason of a pattern of misconduct.