Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003348
Original file (20110003348.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	    8 November 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110003348 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to show he elected his wife as his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) beneficiary within a year of their marriage.  

2.  The applicant states he received misinformation concerning SBP.  He was told that he had to wait a year after he was remarried to apply for SBP for his wife.  He waited a year and then was told he could not request SBP because it had been over a year since his marriage.

3.  The applicant provides his marriage license.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant was issued a 20-year letter certifying his eligibility for retired pay at age 60 in November 1995.  In February 1996, he completed a DD Form 1883 (Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate) in which he indicated that he was not married but had dependent children and elected SBP Children Only, Option C (Immediate Coverage), full amount of retired pay.  

2.  It appears he remarried in July 1999 and did not elect SBP for his then wife.  He was transferred from the Army National Guard (ARNG) to the Retired Reserve in pay grade E-8 on 6 May 2005.  He was placed on the Retired List on 16 February 2007.

3.  On 26 May 2006, the applicant applied for retired pay for nonregular service.  On an accompanying DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel), he attempted to elect spouse and children coverage.  However, he was not entitled to make a new election at that time.

4.  The marriage certificate provided by the applicant shows he remarried on 9 October 2009.  

5.  Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted on 21 September 1972, provided that military members could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents.  

6.  Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1448(a)(5) provides that a person who is not married and has no dependent child upon becoming eligible to participate in the SBP but who later marries or acquires a dependent child may elect to participate in the SBP.  Such an election must be written, signed by the person making the election, and received by the Secretary concerned within one year after the date on which that person marries or acquires that dependent child.  

7.  The Defense Finance and Accounting Service interprets the first part of Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1448(a)(5) to mean, “…who is not married OR has no dependent child….”

8.  Army Echoes is an Army Bulletin for the Army Retiree published three times a year and mailed to Army retirees to keep them abreast of their rights and privileges and to inform them of developments in the Army.  These Bulletins consistently contain a reminder to retirees that they are responsible for updating their accounts within one year of marriage, remarriage, divorce, or upon the death of a spouse and that they may need to make or update a SBP election.  Periodically, these Bulletins contain articles explaining the SBP and the importance of keeping accounts up to date.

9.  Public Law 108-375, enacted 28 October 2004, established an Open Season to be conducted 1 October 2005 through 30 September 2006.  Extensive publicity was given in Army Echoes.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  There is no evidence that the applicant applied for SBP within a year of his marriage to his then wife in July 1999.

2.  Since the applicant did not apply for SBP within a year of his marriage in 1999, he could not later elect SBP unless there was an open season.
3.  The applicant requested spouse and child SBP coverage when he applied for retired pay; however, he was not entitled to do so.  However, that attempted election was made during an SBP open season.  His actions showed an intent to make an open season SBP election to add his current.  As such, it would be in the interest of justice to correct his records to show that he made a proper election to add spouse coverage during the SBP open season in 2006.

BOARD VOTE:

___X____  ___X___  ___X____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing that, on 26 May 2006 during the 1 October 2005 through 30 September 2006 SBP Open Season, the applicant added spouse SBP coverage. 




      __________X__________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110003348





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110003348



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011300

    Original file (20080011300.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The FSM and the applicant married on 8 May 1999. The FSM married the applicant in May 1999. However, the Army Echoes issued at the time he married the applicant reminded retirees that if they remarried and needed to make an SBP election they were responsible for contacting DFAS, clearly indicating that an SBP election could be made upon remarriage and clearly implying that the new wife could be covered.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022514

    Original file (20120022514.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record shows the applicant, upon his retirement, completed a DD Form 2656, wherein he elected "children only" SBP coverage. He became eligible to make a change in SBP election from "children only" coverage to "spouse and children" coverage within 1 year of his marriage (15 June 2012). When he failed to change his SBP coverage to add his spouse within 1 year of their marriage, he irrevocably forfeited future spouse coverage except during a Congressionally-approved open...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002623

    Original file (20090002623.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military records show he enlisted in the U.S. Navy on 20 November 1984 and served four years. Issues of Army Echoes (the Army bulletin published three times a year and mailed to retirees to keep them abreast of their rights and privileges and to inform them of developments in the Army), consistently contain a reminder to retirees that they are responsible for updating their retired pay file, using the Kentucky mailing address provided, within one year of the event if they...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080004937

    Original file (20080004937.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant's Retiree Account Statement, dated 7 June 2006, shows that a premium for RCSBP coverage for child(ren) only had been deducted from his retired pay. He completed the DD Form 1883 by electing dependent child only coverage, Option C. 2.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015598

    Original file (20130015598.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A DD Form 2656-9 (SBP and RCSBP Open Enrollment Election), dated 25 January 2006, shows he elected spouse-only coverage. He provided a letter from DFAS, dated 12 July 2013, which states: * their records indicate he elected RCSBP child coverage on his DD Form 1883 on 7 February 1988 * at that time he was not married * on his original DD Form 2656 he elected SBP for his spouse and he indicated his marriage occurred on 19 May 1989 * there is a 1-year window of eligibility * notification, along...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001439

    Original file (20120001439.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show that he enrolled his spouse in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) in a timely manner. Records show that during the applicant's retirement processing in 1995 he completed an application for retired pay. There is no evidence the applicant submitted an application to enroll in SBP with spouse coverage within 1 year of the date of their marriage.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017909

    Original file (20110017909.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his record be corrected to show he elected Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage for his spouse effective within one year of their marriage. He states he was recently informed he had only one year from the date of his marriage to elect SBP coverage. He provides the following: * Self-authored statement * Marriage certificate * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) * Letter to the Defense Finance and Accounting Service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007240

    Original file (20100007240.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show he enrolled in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) and elected spouse only coverage within 1 year of their marriage. Retiree Account Statements are sent by DFAS to retirees each time there is a change in the retiree's retirement pay. The applicant would have received at least one Retiree Account Statement within the 1-year period after his new marriage.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019127

    Original file (20080019127.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that he has tried unsuccessfully to correct his record to show enrollment in the SBP, with spouse coverage, since the date of his marriage, on 9 April 2005. On 17 July 2008, by letter, DFAS notified the applicant that a review of his retired pay account indicated he had elected SBP for child(ren) coverage since he had no eligible spouse at the time of his retirement from the Regular Army. In his letter the applicant stated, in effect, that he married, on 9...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012872

    Original file (20130012872.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The FSM married the applicant on 26 October 2000. The applicant provided a letter from DFAS to a Member of Congress, dated 5 June 2013, which stated: * the FSM retired on 1 September 1997 * he was not married at the time, but he had minor children and he elected children only SBP coverage * he married the applicant on 26 October 2000, but he did not notify DFAS within 1 year of that marriage that he wished to elect spouse SBP coverage * his lack of an SBP election constitutes a declination...