Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003101
Original file (20110003101.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		

		BOARD DATE:	  9 August 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110003101 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of the sixth and seventh digits of his social security number (SSN) shown on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) from "37" to "73."

2.  The applicant states the sixth and seventh digits of his SSN are incorrectly shown as "37" whereas they should be "73."

3.  The applicant provides a copies of his DD Form 214 and social security card.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 2 May 1966 under the name "G____ E____ C____."  He served on active duty for 3 years and was honorably released from active duty on 1 May 1969.

3.  The applicant is shown to have attended Delaware Valley College, Pennsylvania, prior to his entrance on active duty.  The social security card is shown to have been issued to a "G____ E. C____" with an address at Delaware Valley College.

4.  Although the applicant served primarily under his Army service number, all of the documents in his official record that contain an SSN, including his DD Form 214, utilize the "37" SSN.

5.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents to be furnished to each individual separated from the Army and establishes standardized procedures for the preparation and distribution of these documents.  The purpose of a separation document is to provide the individual with documentary evidence of his/her military service.  It is a vital record for interested government agencies which assist the veteran in obtaining the rights and benefits to which he/she is entitled.  Therefore, it is important that information entered is complete and accurate.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  For historical purposes, the Army has an interest in maintaining the accuracy of its records.  The data and information contained in those records should reflect the conditions and circumstances that existed at the time the records were created.  In the absence of a showing of material error or injustice, there is a reluctance to recommend that those records be changed.  

2.  While it is understandable the applicant desires to now record his correct SSN, there is not a sufficiently compelling reason for compromising the integrity of the Army's records at this late date.  However, this Record of Proceedings will be filed in the applicant's official military personnel file so a record of his SSN will be on hand.


BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x__  ___x_____  ___x_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________x______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110003101



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110003101



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017863

    Original file (20110017863.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). On 7 June 1966, he completed a DA Form 41 (Record of Emergency Data) which also shows he used "73" as the seventh and eighth digits in his SSN. His record contains Special Orders Number 196, Headquarters, U.S. Army Personnel Center, dated 15 July 1969.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021980

    Original file (20130021980.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The evidence of record confirms the applicant's SSN was listed with the sixth and seventh digits as 69 upon his induction into the AUS and his entry on active duty. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct his DD Form 214 to show his correct SSN.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120018351

    Original file (20120018351.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    BOARD DATE: 2 May 2013 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120018351 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) created upon his entry on active duty shows his SSN with the sixth and seventh digits as "90." DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The evidence of record confirms the applicant's SSN was listed with the sixth and seventh digits as "90" upon his enlistment in the RA.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022756

    Original file (20120022756.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) for the period ending 17 April 1979 and his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 20 November 1981 to show his social security number (SSN) with the sixth and seventh digits as "99" vice "88." The evidence of record shows the applicant listed...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003618

    Original file (20130003618.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A review of the Enlisted Grade Structure of the Army chart shows that from 21 January 1951 to 31 May 1958 the rank of MSG was pay grade E-7. The evidence of record confirms the FSM served under the SSN with the sixth and seventh digits of 97 throughout his active duty service as shown on his DD Form 214 for the period ending 7 January 1963. The evidence of record confirms that when the FSM was promoted to pay grade E-7 on 16 April 1953, the corresponding rank at that time was MSG.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005607

    Original file (20120005607.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the sixth digit of his Social Security Number (SSN) as "7," the seventh digit as “5,” and the eighth digit as “9.” 2. The evidence confirms the applicant entered active duty and he served under an SSN using the sixth digit of his SSN as "7," the seventh digit as “5,” and the eighth digit as “9” as listed on the DD Form 398, as corroborated and confirmed by the SSN...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008980

    Original file (20140008980.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of the social security number (SSN) recorded on his DD Forms 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the periods ending 30 August 1961 and 30 August 1967. He provides his social security card and his DD Forms 214 for the periods ending 30 August 1961 and 30 August 1967. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The SSN shown on the applicant's social security card was recorded in his military records.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010097

    Original file (20110010097.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the seventh and eighth digits of his social security number (SSN) as "60" instead of "06." His service personnel records contain only two documents, a DA Form 41 (Record of Emergency Data) and a DD Form 398 (Statement of Personal History), which show the seventh and eighth digits of his SSN as "60." It appears an administrative error was made at the time his SSN...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002066981C070402

    Original file (2002066981C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that his discharge is unjust and needs to be changed to honorable or upgraded to a better discharge. However, his DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged with an undesirable discharge on 26 August 1974 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-206, Section VI, for misconduct – conviction by a civil court or adjudged a juvenile. The Board noted the applicant's request for correction of item 9a (Type of Separation) on his DD Form 214 to show "honorable."

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020282

    Original file (20140020282.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his social security number (SSN) as XXX-XX-X12X vice XXX-XX-X21X. The applicant states the SSN on his DD Form 214 is incorrect; the seventh and eighth digits of his SSN are 12 and not 21. His record contains numerous legal, personnel, and medical documents, to include a DD Form 1584 (National Agency Check Request), dated 24 July 1968, that all show his SSN with...