Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002181
Original file (20110002181.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	 23 August 2011 

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110002181 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, his honorable discharge, dated 
13 November 1989, be changed to a medical discharge.
 
2.  The applicant states:

* There is no record of him injuring his back in basic training
* He hurt his back on 3 December 1986 and again in 1987
* The Army tried to deny it
* His back pain has gotten worse due to this injury 

3.  The applicant provides two pages of a Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) Rating Decision, dated 14 August 1995.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  He enlisted in the Regular Army on 14 November 1986 for a period of 3 years.  He completed his training and was awarded military occupational specialty 13B (Cannon Crewmember).  

3.  A DA Form 1811 (Physical Data and Aptitude Test Scores Upon Release from Active Duty), dated 10 August 1989, states, in pertinent part, "Your physical condition on 891113 [13 November 1989] is such that you are considered physically qualified for separation or for reenlistment without reexamination, provided you reenlist within 6 months and state that you have not acquired new diseases or injuries during the interval period when not a member of the military service."  His physical profile was 111111. 

4.  On 13 November 1989, he was honorably released from active duty under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 for expiration term of service.  He was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Reinforcement) to complete his remaining service obligation.    

5.  There is no evidence which shows he was diagnosed with any medical condition prior to his release from active duty on 13 November 1989. 

6.  On 15 November 1994, he was honorably discharged from the USAR.

7.  In support of his claim, he provided two pages of a DVA Rating Decision, dated 14 August 1995, which shows service connection for his back condition was denied.  The decision also states, in pertinent part, "Records also showed some complaints of back pain on December 3, 1986." 

8.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 4 provides for the discharge or release from active duty upon termination of enlistment, and other periods of active duty or active duty for training.  

9.  Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation) governs the evaluation of physical fitness of Soldiers who may be unfit to perform their military duties because of physical disability.  The unfitness is of such a degree that a Soldier is unable to perform the duties of his office, grade, rank, or rating in such a way as to reasonably fulfill the purposes of his employment on active duty.

10.  Title 10, U.S. Code, chapter 61, provides disability retirement or separation for a member who is physically unfit to perform the duties of his/her office, rank, grade, or rating because of disability incurred while entitled to basic pay.

11.  Chapter 7 (Physical Profiling) of Army Regulation 40-501 (Standards of Medical Fitness) provides that the basic purpose of the physical profile serial system is to provide an index to the overall functional capacity of an individual and is used to assist the unit commander and personnel officer in their determination of what duty assignments the individual is capable of performing, and if reclassification action is warranted.  Four numerical designations (1-4) are used to reflect different levels of functional capacity in six factors (PULHES): P-physical capacity or stamina, U-upper extremities, L-lower extremities, H-hearing and ears, E-eyes, and S-psychiatric.  Numerical designator "1" under all factors indicates that an individual is considered to possess a high level of medical fitness and, consequently, is medically fit for any military assignment.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  He contends he injured his back in basic training on 3 December 1986 and in support of his claim he provided DVA documentation which states "Records also showed some complaints of back pain on December 3, 1986." 

2.  Evidence of record shows he was found to be physically qualified for separation on 13 November 1989 with a physical profile of 111111.

3.  There is no evidence to show the applicant could not perform his duties while on active duty.  Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to show a medical discharge was warranted.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION





BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110002181



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110002181



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087885C070212

    Original file (2003087885C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He also provides a DVA Rating Decision, dated 26 July 2002; DVA documentation; limited service medical records; and numerous DVA medical records. Army Regulation 635-40 governs the evaluation for physical fitness of soldiers who may be unfit to perform their military duties because of physical disability. The Army must find that a service member is physically unfit to reasonably perform his or her duties and assign an appropriate disability rating before he or she can be medically retired...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090771C070212

    Original file (2003090771C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was discharged on 27 August 1963. However, the evidence of record shows that prior to the applicant's discharge in August 1963, competent medical authority determined that he was then medically qualified for separation with a physical profile of 111111. The Board determined that the evidence presented and the merits of this case are insufficient to warrant the relief requested, and therefore, it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050009808C070206

    Original file (20050009808C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 15 July 1977, the applicant's commander requested the applicant be given a medical evaluation to determine his physical fitness for retention on active duty, as he had had several accidents which could have physically impaired his ability to perform his duties. Army Regulation 635-40 governs the evaluation of physical fitness of Soldiers who may be unfit to perform their military duties because of physical disability. The first available evidence of record to indicate there were...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007991

    Original file (20100007991.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 2 February 1984, the applicant was honorably released from active duty under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 4, for completion of required active service. There are no service medical records available. Evidence of record shows the applicant's physical profile was 111111 on 25 May 1983, 2 years after his reported head injury.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060003447C070205

    Original file (20060003447C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Rowland Heflin | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Although the applicant contends that he was never supposed to be sent to Vietnam with a “P-3” and “U-3” medical profile, evidence of record shows he served in Vietnam (from 21 July 1966 through 17 July 1967) prior to receiving a physical profile of “3” under physical capacity or stamina and a physical profile of “3” under upper extremities on 26 September 1967....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006136

    Original file (20090006136.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that he needs a medical discharge because of his feet. On 15 December 1989, the applicant consulted with counsel and requested discharge for the good of the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), chapter 10. Since there is no evidence of record to show the applicant was ever medically unfit to perform his military duties, there is no basis for granting a medical discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014491

    Original file (20080014491.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-40 governs the evaluation for physical fitness of Soldiers who may be unfit to perform their military duties because of physical disability. Consequently, due to the two concepts involved, an individual’s medical condition, although not considered medically unfitting for military service at the time of processing for separation, discharge or retirement, may be sufficient to qualify the individual for DVA benefits based on an evaluation by that agency. Medical evidence...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001054438C070420

    Original file (2001054438C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Counsel also states that the applicant has submitted records from the DVA showing that he was granted service connection for depression, headaches, and joint pain with a combined rating of 40 percent, and with the effective date being the date following his discharge from service. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, and advisory opinion, it is concluded: The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004294

    Original file (20090004294.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. There is no evidence to show that the applicant could not perform his duties while on active duty. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to show a medical retirement was warranted.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013149

    Original file (20140013149.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He provided service medical records, dated April 2012, which show he was treated for back pain. Army Regulation 40-501 (Standards of Medical Fitness), chapter 7 (Physical Profiling), provides that the basic purpose of the physical profile serial system is to provide an index to the overall functional capacity of an individual and is used to assist the unit commander and personnel officer in their determination of what duty assignments the individual is capable of performing and if...