Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001860
Original file (20110001860.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		
		BOARD DATE:	  28 July 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110001860 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his:

* date of birth (DOB) as 2 February 1945
* date of rank (DOR) as 18 July 1969

2.  The applicant states, in effect, the dates were missed. 

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  In connection with his induction, the applicant completed a DD Form 398 (Statement of Personal History).  He indicated that his DOB was 2 February 1945.  He authenticated this form by placing his signature in the appropriate block.

3.  He was inducted into the Army of the United States on 24 August 1967.  Item 5 (DOB) of his DD Form 47 (Induction Record) listed his DOB as 2 February 1945.

4.  The DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) that was created at the time he entered the Army showed his DOB as 2 February 1945.

5.  His records contain several personnel, legal, and medical documents including a record of emergency data, an insurance election certificate, an application for a military identification card, and various other documents that show his DOB as 2 February 1945.

6.  After a series of promotions and reductions, he was promoted to private (PV2)/E-2 on 18 July 1969.

7.  He was honorably released from active duty on 19 September 1969.  His DD Form 214 shows in items:

* 5a (Grade, Rate or Rank) and 5b (Pay Grade) - "PV2" and "E-2"
* 6 (DOR) - 18 July 1945
* 9 (DOB) - 2 February 1969"

8.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) establishes the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  The regulation directs that the purpose of the separation document is to provide the individual with documentary evidence of his or her military service.  It is important that information entered on the form should be complete and accurate.  Items 5a and 5b show the rank and grade at the time of separation; item 6 shows the effective date of pay grade, and item 9 shows the DOB.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The applicant listed his DOB as 2 February 1945 upon his induction.  This DOB is consistent with the DOB on all official military records throughout his military service.  Additionally, he was advanced to PV2/E-2 on 18 July 1969.  It appears his DD Form 214 inadvertently mixed his DOB and DOR.  Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show the correct DOB and correct DOR.
BOARD VOTE:

____x__  _____x___  ___x_____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his DD Form 214 by:

* deleting from item 6 the entry "18 Jul 45" and adding the entry "18 Jul 69"
* deleting from item 9 the entry "2 Feb 69" and adding the entry "2 Feb 45"



      _______ _ x  _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110001860



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110001860



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002226

    Original file (20130002226.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides: * Promotion orders * DD Form 214 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The regulation, in effect at the time provided that for Item 5a, enlisted personnel would enter the grade in which serving at time of separation, indicating whether permanent or temporary.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000285

    Original file (20150000285.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    These orders indicate this promotion was temporary; however, his DA Form 20 shows this promotion was made permanent on 23 September 1969, under the authority of Army Regulation 600-200, paragraph 7-22a. An individual could not be promoted to SGT or staff sergeant if the promotion would cause a surplus of by-grade authorized NCO personnel in the unit to which the individual was assigned. There are no orders promoting him to the rank of SGT in his records.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002197

    Original file (20090002197.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, correction of the rank and pay grade shown on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). The applicant contends, in effect, that the rank and pay grade shown on his DD Form 214 with an effective date of 10 December 1970 should be corrected because there is no documentation in his records reducing him from PFC/E-3 to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013123

    Original file (20100013123.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013335

    Original file (20130013335.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He would like to have his DD Form 214 corrected to show his rank and pay grade as E-4. His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in: * Item 33 (Appointments and Reductions) he was promoted to pay grade E-2 on 20 December 1969; the advancement to pay grade E-3 and promotion to pay grade E-4 are lined through * Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) all the awards listed on his DD Form 214 8. Without evidence, it appears his pay grade was E-2 at time his separation on 7 June 1971.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070012312

    Original file (20070012312.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 18 (Appointments and Reductions), of his DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record – Part ll), shows that he was reduced to pay grade E-3 effective 15 January 1987. The evidence shows that the applicant was promoted to pay grade E-4 on 27 September 1985. The evidence shows that he served in pay grade E-4 from 27 September 1985 until 15 January 1987, the date he was reduced to pay grade E-3.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007610

    Original file (20130007610.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show he was promoted to the rank and pay grade of specialist five (SP5)/E-5 and that he be paid back pay and allowances due him. The applicant has provided duly authenticated orders issued on the day he departed for assignment to Vietnam showing he was promoted to the rank and pay grade of SP5 E-5 on 10 January 1970. _____________X____________ CHAIRPERSON I...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011420

    Original file (20100011420.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant contends his rank and grade should be corrected to show SP5/E-5 on his DD Form 214. The available evidence confirms the applicant was promoted to the rank and grade of SP5/E-5 effective 17 October 1969 in official orders that were published subsequent to his 26 October 1969 REFRAD.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006100

    Original file (20140006100.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). It is acknowledged the order, dated 22 February 1970, that released the applicant from active duty on that date indicates his rank was SP4. However, there is no evidence of record that shows he was promoted to SP4 (E-4).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002822

    Original file (20110002822.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This pamphlet shows the 2nd Battalion, 8th Infantry, the unit to which the applicant was assigned, was cited for award of the: a. RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation for the period October 1966 through 28 July 1969 by Department of the Army General Order (DAGO) Number 3, dated 1970. b. RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation for the period 29 July 1969 through 17 November 1970, by DAGO Number 52, dated 1971. c. RVN Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation for the...