Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001619
Original file (20110001619.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  1 September 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110001619 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the following:

* Bronze Star Medal (BSM)
* BSM with 1st Oak Leaf Cluster (1OLC)
* Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM)

2.  He states he received the certificates for these awards.

3.  He provides copies of certificates for the BSM (1OLC) and ARCOM.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's record shows he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 12 February 1969.  He served in Republic of Vietnam (RVN) from 14 July 1969 to 11 July 1970.  He was honorably released from active duty on 11 February 1971.

3.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 does not show award of the BSM, BSM (1OLC), or ARCOM.

4.  There is no entry in item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) showing he was awarded the BSM, BSM (1OLC), or ARCOM.  Additionally, there is no evidence of any general orders awarding him these medals.

5.  The Awards and Decorations Computer Assisted Retrieval System (ADCARS) maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973, was reviewed.  This review failed to show any orders were published authorizing awards of the BSM, BSM (1OLC), or ARCOM to him.

6.  He provides a BSM Certificate, dated 6 July 1970, that shows he was awarded the BSM (1OLC) for meritorious achievement in ground operations against hostile forces in the RVN from July 1969 to July 1970.  He also provides an ARCOM Certificate, dated 19 July 1970, that shows he was awarded the ARCOM for meritorious achievement in the RVN from 1 January to 30 April 1970. 
However, these certificates are not contained in his military personnel record.

7.  U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) governed the military awards program in Vietnam during the Vietnam War.  It stated the BSM was awarded for heroism or for meritorious achievement or service which did not involve aerial flight but which was performed in connection with military operations against an armed enemy including combat, support, and supply operations.  The approval authority for award of the BSM was generally delegated no lower than brigadier generals in command of separate brigades.  However, the records of the Awards Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command show that authority for award of the BSM for service was delegated to colonels in command of the U.S. Army Support Commands located at Saigon, Cam Ranh Bay, and Qui Nhon and in command of separate engineer brigades in Vietnam assigned to the U.S. Army Engineer Troops (Provisional).  An oak leaf cluster is authorized for wear for each additional award of the BSM.

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the ARCOM may be awarded to any member of the Armed Forces of the United States who, while serving in any capacity with the Army after 6 December 1941, distinguishes himself or herself by heroism, meritorious achievement, or meritorious service.  As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The fact the applicant provided two certificates indicating he was awarded the BSM (1OLC) and ARCOM is not sufficient evidence with which to add these awards to his DD Form 214.  He provided no orders showing he was awarded the BSM, BSM (1OLC), or ARCOM and no evidence was found in his service personnel record or in ADCARS.  Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to support addition of these awards to his DD Form 214.

2.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X___  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________X___________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110001619



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110001619



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020997

    Original file (20100020997.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The two BSM certificates provided by the applicant show he was awarded the BSM (first award) for the period December 1969 to November 1970 on 5 December 1970. The applicant provides two BSM Certificates that show two awards of the BSM; however, they are for the same period of meritorious service and his records only contain orders for one award of the BSM. However, the applicant's records do contain orders awarding him the Air Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070011507C080407

    Original file (20070011507C080407.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's record contains an Office of The Adjutant General, United States Army Reserve Components Personnel and Administration Center (ARPERCEN) letter, dated 7 April 1980, which includes a DA Form 1577 (Authorization for Issuance of Awards) that indicates that the applicant was authorized and issued the following awards: AM with Numeral 2 (3rd Award); ARCOM; AGCM; Meritorious Unit Emblem; NDSM; VSM with 1 silver service star and 1 bronze service star; and RVN Campaign Medal with...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019360

    Original file (20100019360.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no orders or any other evidence in his official military personnel file (OMPF) that show he was recommended for or awarded the ARCOM and/or BSM. In the absence of orders or any other corroborating evidence showing he was awarded or recommended for these awards, the citations and certificates alone are insufficient for basing a correction to his DD Form 214. ____________X_____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022171

    Original file (20100022171.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) is void of any orders or documents that indicate he was ever recommended for or awarded the BSM while serving in Vietnam or at any other time during his military service. There are no available general orders showing the applicant was awarded the BSM by the appropriate award authority. The applicant's DA Form 20 documents the BSM and ARCOM on the same entry; however, the BSM is lined through.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012603

    Original file (20130012603.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides copies of: * DD Form 214 (copy 1) * DA Form 759 (Individual Flight Record and Flight Certificate - Army), for the period from November 1970 to February 1971 * Certificate for award of the ARCOM with 3rd OLC for the period April 1969 to December 1970, dated 19 December 1970 * General Orders Number 3104, dated 17 February 1971, announcing award of the BSM for the period 16 February 1970 to 15 February 1971 (This order contains a hand-lettered entry indicating the order...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004653

    Original file (20120004653.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant submitted an ARCOM Certificate, ARCOM Citation and General Orders Number 196, dated 9 March 1970, which awarded him the ARCOM for meritorious service while serving in the RVN during the period January 1969 to April 1970. There is no evidence in the available records that shows the applicant was awarded the BSM.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021667

    Original file (20110021667.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He received all "excellent" conduct and efficiency rating during his active duty service; there is no evidence of any disciplinary actions or a commander's disqualification for the Army Good Conduct Medal; he attained the rank of sergeant (SGT); and he received multiple awards for meritorious service and achievement, and one for valor. Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to award him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 22 June 1968 through 12 December 1969 and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021817

    Original file (20100021817.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PH and SS are not included in the list of awards in item 41 of his DA Form 20, and his record is void of any orders or other documents that show he was ever recommended for or awarded either of these awards by proper authority while serving in the RVN. Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the DD Form 214 he was issued at the time shows he earned the following awards during his active duty tenure: * NDSM * VSM *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012016

    Original file (20090012016.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant's record shows he was inducted into the Army of the United States and entered active duty on 8 February 1968. There are no orders or other documents on file that show he was awarded the ARCOM with 2nd Oak Leaf Cluster or BSM while serving on active duty.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013278

    Original file (20100013278.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 shows he was awarded or authorized to wear the: * National Defense Service Medal * ARCOM * Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) * AM * Vietnam Campaign Medal [properly known as the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960)] * BSM 10. As a result, it would be appropriate to award him the AGCM for his qualifying period of honorable active service from 22 January...