Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019360
Original file (20100019360.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  25 January 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100019360 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) and Bronze Star Medal (BSM).

2.  The applicant states the awards are not listed in his DD Form 214 because he separated prior to the information becoming available for addition to his DD Form 214.

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214 and citations and certificates for the ARCOM and BSM.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 17 May 1968.  He completed his initial entry training and was awarded military occupational specialty 64A (Light Vehicle Driver).

3.  Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he arrived in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) on or around 4 April 1969 and departed the RVN on 19 March 1970.  Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) does not show the ARCOM or BSM.

4.  There are no orders or any other evidence in his official military personnel file (OMPF) that show he was recommended for or awarded the ARCOM and/or BSM.

5.  On 22 March 1970, he was released from active duty.  His DD Form 214 does not show the ARCOM or BSM.

6.  During the processing of this case, a member of the Board's staff reviewed the Awards and Decorations Computer Assisted Retrieval System (ADCARS).  This is a web-based index containing general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973.  No orders pertaining to the applicant were found in the ADCARS file.

7.  He provided ARCOM and BSM citations and certificates showing he was awarded the ARCOM for meritorious service and the BSM for meritorious achievement for the same period (April 1969-March 1970).

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states:

	a.  The ARCOM may be awarded to any member of the Armed Forces of the United States who, while serving in any capacity with the Army after 6 December 1941, distinguishes himself or herself by heroism, meritorious achievement, or meritorious service.

	b.  The BSM is awarded in time of war for heroism and for meritorious achievement or service not involving participation in aerial flight in connection with military operations against an armed enemy or while engaged in military operations involving conflict with an opposing armed force in which the United States is not a belligerent party.

	c.  All personal decorations require formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders.

	d.  Only one decoration will be awarded to an individual or unit for the same act, achievement, or period of meritorious service.  Recommendations for award of a decoration for meritorious service will not refer to acts of heroism or meritorious achievements which have been previously recognized by award of a decoration.  Continuation of the same or similar type of service already recognized by an award for meritorious service or achievement will not be the basis for a second award.  If appropriate, an award may be made to include the extended period of service by superseding the earlier award or the award previously made may be amended to incorporate the extended period of service.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show the ARCOM and BSM was carefully considered.

2.  His OMPF is void of orders or any other evidence that indicate he was recommended for or awarded the ARCOM and BSM.  Additionally, no orders pertaining to him were found in the ADCARS file.  In the absence of orders or any other corroborating evidence showing he was awarded or recommended for these awards, the citations and certificates alone are insufficient for basing a correction to his DD Form 214.

3.  Based on the foregoing, his request should be denied.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  _____X__  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ____________X_____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100019360



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100019360



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001619

    Original file (20110001619.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the following: * Bronze Star Medal (BSM) * BSM with 1st Oak Leaf Cluster (1OLC) * Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) 2. He provided no orders showing he was awarded the BSM, BSM (1OLC), or ARCOM and no evidence was found in his service personnel record or in ADCARS.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070011507C080407

    Original file (20070011507C080407.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's record contains an Office of The Adjutant General, United States Army Reserve Components Personnel and Administration Center (ARPERCEN) letter, dated 7 April 1980, which includes a DA Form 1577 (Authorization for Issuance of Awards) that indicates that the applicant was authorized and issued the following awards: AM with Numeral 2 (3rd Award); ARCOM; AGCM; Meritorious Unit Emblem; NDSM; VSM with 1 silver service star and 1 bronze service star; and RVN Campaign Medal with...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012016

    Original file (20090012016.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant's record shows he was inducted into the Army of the United States and entered active duty on 8 February 1968. There are no orders or other documents on file that show he was awarded the ARCOM with 2nd Oak Leaf Cluster or BSM while serving on active duty.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070010233C080407

    Original file (20070010233C080407.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's MPRJ is void of any orders or other documents that indicate he was ever recommended for or awarded the BSM while serving on active duty. The applicant's record is void of any orders, documents, or an award recommendation that shows he was ever recommended for the BSM while serving on active duty. The evidence of record also shows that based on his RVN service and campaign participation, the applicant is entitled to the RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation and 1...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004653

    Original file (20120004653.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant submitted an ARCOM Certificate, ARCOM Citation and General Orders Number 196, dated 9 March 1970, which awarded him the ARCOM for meritorious service while serving in the RVN during the period January 1969 to April 1970. There is no evidence in the available records that shows the applicant was awarded the BSM.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013515

    Original file (20140013515.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provided a copy of a certificate and citation stating that he was awarded the ARCOM for meritorious service for the period 3 November 1967 to 9 December 1968 while serving as an assistant operations sergeant at Fort Gordon, Georgia. There are no available general orders awarding the applicant the BSM with "V" Device or the ARCOM. _______ _ x_______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020997

    Original file (20100020997.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The two BSM certificates provided by the applicant show he was awarded the BSM (first award) for the period December 1969 to November 1970 on 5 December 1970. The applicant provides two BSM Certificates that show two awards of the BSM; however, they are for the same period of meritorious service and his records only contain orders for one award of the BSM. However, the applicant's records do contain orders awarding him the Air Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022171

    Original file (20100022171.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) is void of any orders or documents that indicate he was ever recommended for or awarded the BSM while serving in Vietnam or at any other time during his military service. There are no available general orders showing the applicant was awarded the BSM by the appropriate award authority. The applicant's DA Form 20 documents the BSM and ARCOM on the same entry; however, the BSM is lined through.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023235

    Original file (20100023235.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in two separate applications, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM), Bronze Star Medal (BSM) with "V" Device for heroism, and the BSM for meritorious achievement. He provides: * General Orders (GO) Number 6301 awarding him the ARCOM * the associated ARCOM award certificate * GO Number 6694 awarding him the BSM with "V" Device * a BSM award certificate for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002530

    Original file (20140002530.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A review of the applicant's military personnel records failed to reveal any orders or other evidence that shows he was recommended for or awarded a second award of the SS. The available evidence does not show the applicant was recommended for or awarded a second award of the SS for actions in the RVN. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant's DD Form 214 to show his awards and decorations, as recommended below.