Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019242
Original file (20080019242.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	 28 April 2009 

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080019242 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Forms 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) be changed to show the dates "10 Nov 1971 to 6 April 1972" and from "6 April 1972 to 23 May 1977." 

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that his service record should start on 10 November 1971 and finish on 23 May 1977 and that he wants proof of his period of service in late 1971 to 1972. 

3.  The applicant does not provide any supporting documentation in support of his application. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  On 10 November 1971, records show that the appropriate authority determined at a pre-induction examination that the applicant was found acceptable for induction into the Armed Forces.  Accordingly, a DD Form 47 (Record of Induction) was prepared.  

3.  On 6 April 1972, records show that the appropriate authority determined through physical examination that the applicant was found acceptable for induction into the Armed Forces and that he was qualified for induction into the Army of the United States at Fort Ord, California.  

4.  On 6 April 1972, the applicant authenticated in his own hand USAREC Form 180-R (Acknowledgement of Service Obligation) whereby he acknowledged that he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 6 April 1972 for a 2-year active duty obligation. 

5.  Armed Forces Examining and Entrance Station, Los Angeles, California Special Orders Number 70, dated 6 April 1972, inducted the applicant into the Army of the United States in the grade of private (PV1)/pay grade E-1 with an active duty commitment of 2 years.  This order shows the effective date of induction was 6 April 1972.  Accordingly, the applicant entered active duty and completed basic and advanced military training and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 64C (Motor Transport Operator).

6.  On 5 April 1974, the applicant was honorably released from active duty due to completion of his active duty service obligation.  Records show he was transferred in the U.S. Reserve (UAR) Control Group (Reinforcement) to complete his military statutory service obligation.  He was issued a DD Form 214 which shows he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 6 April 1972 and released from active duty on 5 April 1974.  This same DD Form 214 shows the applicant completed 2 years of active service and that he had neither prior active nor inactive service.  Records show the highest rank/grade the applicant attained during this enlistment period was specialist (SP4)/E-4.  Records further show he authenticated his DD Form 214 in his own hand.

7.  Records show the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 24 May 1974 for a 3-year period.  The applicant's DD Form 4 (Enlistment Contract, Armed Forces of the United States) shows he had honorable prior service in the U. S. Army from 6 April 1972 to 5 April 1974 and that on his release date he held the rank/grade of SP4/E-4.  



8.  On 23 May 1977, the applicant was honorably released from active duty at Fort Gordon, Georgia and transferred to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) to complete his remaining Reserve obligation.  He was issued a DD Form 214 which shows his highest rank attained during this period of service was SP4/E-4.  This same DD Form 214 further shows he had 2 years of prior active service and that his total active service was 5 years.  His record of service shows he had 1 month and 19 days of inactive service [USAR service from
6 April 1974 through 23 May 1974] and that his total service for pay was 5 years, 1 month, and 19 days.

9.  On 5 April 1978, the applicant was discharged from the USAR (Standby Reserve) per the directive of the Office of The Adjutant General, Army Reserve Components Personnel and Administration Center, St. Louis, Missouri Orders 03-1016821, dated 28 March 1978.  These orders show the applicant served in the Standby Reserve from 31 August 1977 to 5 April 1978. 

10.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), then in effect, provided in pertinent part that the purpose of the separation document was to provide the Soldier with documentary evidence of his military service.  In the preparation of the separation document all available service records would be used as a basis for preparing the Soldier's DD Form 214, including DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record), DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record), enlistment contracts, and military personnel orders.

11.  Army Regulation 635-5, then in effect, provided, in pertinent part, that the date entered on active duty or date of enlistment or reenlistment would be entered on DD Form 214 in Item 15 (Date Entered Active Duty).  This regulation also provided guidance that the date of separation would be entered in Item 9d (Effective Date [of Separation]).  

12.  Army Regulation 15-185 (ABCMR) prescribes the policies and procedures for correction of military records by the Secretary of the Army, acting through the ABCMR.  The regulation provides that the ABCMR begins its consideration of each case with the presumption of administrative regularity.  The applicant has the burden of proving an error or injustice by a preponderance of the evidence.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his separation document does not properly show his complete period of service from 10 November 1971 to 23 May 1977.  


2.  Records show an appropriate military authority initiated the applicant's induction on 10 November 1971.  However, the actual review, completion, and qualification for induction as determined by the Armed Forces Examining and Entrance Station, Los Angeles was in fact completed and executed on 6 April 
1972.  

3.  In view of the foregoing, and without the applicant showing that his record of service or his DD Forms 214 issued on 5 April 1974 and on 24 May 1977 are in error, there is no evidence of an error or injustice.  Therefore, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief. 

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X___  ____X___  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _________X_____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080019242



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080019242



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013137

    Original file (20110013137.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides in support of his application: * Two Army medical records * DA Form 20 * DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) * DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214) * ADRB letters * Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) records * Social Security Statement * VA decision and medical records CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant's military service records are not available to the Board for review. c. Therefore, based on the available evidence, it would...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021778

    Original file (20110021778.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Although there are no orders in the available records which show he was appointed to SP4, his 14 April 1972 orders for the Air Medal show his rank as SP4. Therefore, he should be awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) and his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting the entry in item 5a of his DD Form 214 and replacing it with the entry...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016567

    Original file (20130016567.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) records to show: * His active Reserve service * Promotion to Staff Sergeant (SSG)/E-6 * Change in his military occupational specialty (MOS) 2. His record contains a Promotion Recommendation and Board Report Form dated 8 August 1977 which listed his current rank as SP5 and shows he was recommended for promotion to SSG. The evidence of record shows he held no military status from 26 March 1971 to 3 October 1972 and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012721

    Original file (20080012721.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record shows that the applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 17 September 1968 and was honorably separated from active duty as a CPL on 25 April 1970. Upon completion of his military service obligation on 16 September 1974, he was honorably discharged from the USAR in the rank of SP4. However, there is no evidence to show he served as a CPL and, in September 1977, he was honorably discharged from the USAR.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040005620C070208

    Original file (20040005620C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, the applicant's DD Form 214 was prepared to record his service from the date of his entry on active duty on 17 July 1972 until his release from active duty on 16 November 1972. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief and to excuse failure to timely file. As a result, the Board recommends that the DD Form 214 of the individual concerned be corrected: a. in items 5a and 5b to show his rank and grade as PFC, E-3;...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012510

    Original file (20080012510.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 be corrected to show that he entered active duty at Fort Ord, California on 24 June 1971 and not on 31 August 1977, which was his second enlistment. This regulation further states that for the entry in Block 12a (Date Entered AD [Active Duty] This Period, enter the beginning date of the continuous period of AD for issuance of this DD Form 214, for which a DD Form 214 was not previously issued. Inasmuch as the applicant had received DD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005381

    Original file (20090005381.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) dated 7 April 1977 to show his military occupational specialty (MOS) as 11B4O instead of 11B2O. For an enlisted Soldier, the entry shows the first 5 characters of the primary and/or secondary MOS code which includes the 3 characters of the MOS, the fourth character of skill and grade level in the MOS, and the fifth character of a special qualification identifier (SQI), if applicable. The evidence...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010919

    Original file (20060010919.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. On 8 November 1972, the separation authority approved the applicant’s discharge and directed that he receive an UD. The applicant's contention that his initial upgrade of his discharge to a GD by the SDRB be affirmed so that he may receive benefits through the VA was carefully considered.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008373

    Original file (20090008373.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 8 October 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090008373 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant provides, in support of his applications, two DD Forms 149 (Application for Correction of Military Records Under the Provisions of Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552, dated 20 April; 2009 and 27 May 2009; DD Forms 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the periods ending 15 August 1957 and 25 October 1969; an ARPC Form 271 (Reserve Order EK - 2343), dated 5...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078053C070215

    Original file (2002078053C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. On 30 April 1975, the applicant was advised by certified mail at the above address that he was being discharged from the United States Army for desertion with a UD. The Board notes the applicant's many post-service accomplishments, to include his educational, artistic, and community-service achievements and,...