Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000296
Original file (20110000296.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		

		BOARD DATE:	  12 July 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110000296 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show the Army Good Conduct Medal
(4th Award) and the Army Commendation Medal (2nd Award).

2.  The applicant states:

* He was medically discharged from his Army base with an incomplete
DD Form 214
* He received the orders for these awards on 27 December 2010
* His Army Good Conduct Medal and ETS [expiration term of service] award were pending when he went on transition leave

3.  The applicant provides:

* Permanent Orders 251-05, dated 6 November 2010
* a DA Form 638 (Recommendation for Award), dated 20 October 2010
* his DD Form 214

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 20 November 2001.  He completed his training and he was awarded military occupational specialty 92R (parachute rigger).  On 13 December 2010, he was retired by reason of permanent disability after completing 9 years and 24 days of creditable active service.
2.  Item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 shows the:

* Army Commendation Medal
* Army Achievement Medal (2nd Award)
* Army Good Conduct Medal (2nd Award)
* National Defense Service Medal
* Afghanistan Campaign Medal with two bronze service stars
* Global War on Terrorism Expeditionary Medal
* Global War on Terrorism Service Medal
* Overseas Service Ribbon
* Parachutist Badge
* Parachute Rigger Badge 

3.  Permanent Order 251-05, issued by the 87th Quartermaster Detachment (Parachute), dated 6 November 2010, award him the Army Good Conduct Medal (4th Award) for the period 2 November 2007 to 1 November 2010. 

4.  There are no orders for his previous awards of the Army Good Conduct Medal contained in his available record or his interactive Personnel Electronic Records Management System (iPERMS) file.

5.  Permanent Order 288-01, issued by the 10th Support Group, dated
2 November 2010, awarded the applicant the Army Commendation Medal (2nd Award) for meritorious service during the period 11 February 2007 to
20 November 2010.  The reason for this award was his expiration of term of service.

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency, and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service.  This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service.  Although there is no automatic entitlement to the Army Good Conduct Medal, disqualification must be justified.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The orders provided by the applicant for the Army Good Conduct Medal
(4th Award) were carefully considered.  However, there are no orders for the Army Good Conduct Medal in the available records and his DD Form 214 shows 


entitlement to the Army Good Conduct Medal (2d Award).  Since the governing regulation states a qualifying period of active enlisted service for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal is 3 years, and he only completed 9 years and
24 days of creditable active service, it appears the orders for the 4th award are incorrect; however, he would be eligible for a 3rd award of the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 20 November 2007 through 19 November 2010.  His 1st award would be for the period 20 November 2001 through 19 November 2004 and his 2nd award would be for the period 20 November 2004 through
19 November 2007.  As such, his 3rd award should have been for the period
20 November 2007 through 19 November 2010.  Therefore, it would be appropriate to amend Permanent Orders 251-05 to show he was awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal (3rd Award) for the period 20 November 2007 through 19 November 2010, and to correct his DD Form 214 to show this additional award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.

2.  Permanent orders awarded the applicant the Army Commendation Medal (2nd Award).  Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this award.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

___x_____  ____x__  ___x____  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  amending Permanent Orders 251-05, dated 6 November 2010 to show award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (3rd Award) for the period 20 November 2007 through 19 November 2010;

	b.  deleting from item 13 of his DD Form 214 the Army Commendation Medal and the Army Good Conduct Medal (2nd Award); and


	c.  adding to item 13 of his DD Form 214 the:

* Army Commendation Medal (2nd Award)
* Army Good Conduct Medal (3rd Award)

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented was insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to correcting his DD Form 214 to show any more than three awards of the Army Good Conduct Medal.



      _________x_____________
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110000296



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110000296



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017316

    Original file (20110017316.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In two of the ABCMR Proceedings (i.e., Docket Number AR20080016883, dated 22 January 2009, and Docket Number AR20090018856, dated 19 May 2010), the applicant submitted documentation in support of correcting his 14 November 2008 DD Form 214 to show the Parachutist Badge, Ranger Tab, Sapper Tab, Combat Action Badge, and Bronze Star Medal. ABCMR Docket Number AR1999024163, dated 15 May 2002, shows the applicant requested correction of his records to show three additional awards of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020225

    Original file (20100020225.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the Meritorious Service Medal (MSM), the Meritorious Unit Commendation (MUC), and the Army Superior Unit Award (ASUA). The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 * MSM award certificate with permanent order number * Permanent Orders 049-04, dated 18 February 2009 * Extract of recently approved unit awards from the Military Awards Branch, U.S. Army Human...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005431

    Original file (20120005431.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    BOARD DATE: 25 September 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120005431 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should show his correct foreign and combat service in Kuwait/Iraq. With respect to his deployed service, although the second period of service in Kuwait/Iraq from 17 March 2010 to 1 February 2011 is reflected in item 18 of his DD Form 214, the first period of service in Kuwait/Iraq from 27 December 2007 to 16 February 2009 is not.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008759

    Original file (20100008759.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show a 3rd award of the Army Commendation Medal, Sapper Tab, Iraq Campaign Medal (ICM) with two bronze service stars, and the Combat Action Badge. The applicant requested correction of his records to show award of the Combat Action Badge. Based on the applicant's service in Iraq from 28 February 2003 to 10 February 2004 and his request for the ICM in lieu of the GWOTEM, he is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001517

    Original file (20140001517.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He provided copies of the following: * PO Number 299-16 issued by the U.S. Army Human Resources Command on 25 October 2012 announcing award of the Presidential Unit Citation to the 1st Battalion, 502nd Infantry Regiment, for the period 16 to 26 November 2010 * DA Form 638 which recommended him for award of the Army Commendation Medal with 3rd OLC for outstanding meritorious service from 14 November 2007 through 29 July 2013; this award was approved by PO Number 161-005 on 9 July 2013 3. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070007906

    Original file (20070007906.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. Evidence of record shows that the applicant successfully completed the Parachute Rigger course conducted by the U.S. Army Quartermaster School and held an awarded MOS of 43E. Therefore, he is entitled to award of the Parachute Rigger Badge and correction of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000030

    Original file (20110000030.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The DA Form 638 and award orders provided by the applicant confirm he earned the third award of the MSM, ninth award of the AGCM, and two awards of the MUC. As a result, it would be appropriate to add these awards to his record and DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending item 13 of his 31 October 2010 DD Form 214 to add the MSM (3rd Award), AGCM (9th Award), and MUC (2nd Award).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004274

    Original file (20130004274.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year. Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to award him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 21 August 1964 through 2 June 1967 and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007116

    Original file (20100007116.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his awards of the Army Commendation Medal (3rd award), Army Good Conduct Medal (2nd award), Iraq Campaign Medal with two bronze service stars, and the Korea Defense Service Medal. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the third award of the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 3 March 2000 through 2 March 2003 and correct his DD Form 214 to show this...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008686

    Original file (20130008686.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Forms 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he was awarded an additional Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) and two additional Army Achievement Medals (AAM's). While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of...