Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029979
Original file (20100029979.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  7 July 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100029979 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction to Item 25 (Separation Authority) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty).

2.  He states that Item 25 should show Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Separations), paragraph 16-7 (Early Separation due to reduction in force, strength limitations, or budgetary constraints) and not paragraph 16-8 (Separation of Soldiers of medical holding detachments/
companies).  He was not in a holding unit, he was in a regular unit.  On 28 September 2010, he discovered that his DD Form 214 was wrong when the Department of Veterans Affairs sent him a letter.  

3.  He provides:

* DD Form 214
* An extract of paragraphs 16-7 and 16-8 of Army Regulation 635-200, dated 6 June 2005

COUNSEL'S REQUEST, STATEMENT AND EVIDENCE:

Counsel provides no requests, statement, or additional evidence in support of the applicant's request. 




CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army (RA), in pay grade E-1, on 14 June 1990, for 3 years.  He completed training and he was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 16S (Manpads Crewmember).  He served in Saudi Arabia from 13 October 1990 through 3 April 1991.  

3.  He reenlisted in the RA on 5 March 1993 for 3 years.  He served in Germany from 25 August 1993 through 24 August 1996.

4.  Orders Number 248-09 were issued by the U.S. Army Europe Transition Center, Wiesbaden, Germany, on 5 September 1996, reassigned him to the U.S. Army Transition Point with a reporting date of 13 September 1996.  The orders show he was reassigned for separation processing under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200.  

5.  He was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) in pay grade E-1 on 14 September 1996, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 16-8, for Reduction in Force.  He was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Reinforcement).  He was credited with completing 6 years, 3 months, and 1 day of net active service and no time lost.

6.  He was issued a DD Form 214 showing the following entries:

* Item 25 - " Army Regulation 635-200, Paragraph 16-8"
* Item 26 (Separation Code) - "LCC"
* Item 27 (Reentry (RE) Code) - "RE-3"
* Item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) - "Reduction in Force"

7.  Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 16-7 of the version then in effect, dated 17 October 1990, specified a Soldier could be separated due to disqualification for duty in MOS.  Paragraph 16-8 of the same regulation specified a Soldier could be separated prior to their expiration of term of service (ETS) due to reduction in force, strengths limitations, or budgetary constraints.

8.  Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 16-7 of the current version, dated          6 June 2005, states Soldiers may be separated prior to ETS due to reduction in force, strengths limitations, or budgetary constraints.  Paragraph 16-8 provides for the separation of Soldiers in Warrior Transition Units.

9.  Army Regulation 635-5-1 (SPD Codes), then in effect, showed the SPD of "LCC" as shown on the applicant's DD Form 214 was appropriate when the narrative reason for involuntary REFRAD was "Reduction in Force" and the authority for discharge was Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 16-8.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contentions have been acknowledged; however, he separated on 14 September 1996.  He was issued a DD Form 214 showing in Item 25 he was REFRAD under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 16-8, for Reduction in Force which was the correct authority based upon the version of Army Regulation 635-200 in effect at the time.

2.  The separation authority and separation code for separation listed on his DD Form 214 are commensurate with and correspond to the reason for his discharge.

3.  He has failed to show through the evidence submitted or the evidence of record that the separation authority (Item 25) shown on his DD Form 214 is incorrect.  

4.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting his request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X_____  ____X____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100029979





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100029979



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003345C070206

    Original file (20050003345C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He also requests that item 25 (Separation Code) on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show Army Regulation (AR) 635-200, paragraph 16-7 instead of AR 635-200, paragraph 16-8. The applicant provides two applications. Therefore, the separation authority used in the applicant’s case is correct and was applied in accordance with the applicable regulations.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013997C070205

    Original file (20060013997C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his record be corrected by changing the authority for his discharge and his reentry (RE) Code. On 31 May 1999 the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 16-8. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019802

    Original file (20090019802.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was authorized severance pay under the Reduction in Authorized Strength - Qualitative Early Transition Program. Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Separations), sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. At the time of his discharge there were no provisions for separation pay for enlisted Soldiers discharged under this authority.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009565

    Original file (20140009565.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). This document notified him that the Calendar Year 1988 Master SGT/SGT QMP Selection Board reviewed his official military personnel file (OMPF), and after a comprehensive review, the board considered his record of service including performance and future potential for retention in the Army, and barred him from reenlistment. He was informed that: * separation proceedings must be initiated no later...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016423

    Original file (20130016423.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 13 May 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130016423 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Soldiers separated by reason of reduction in force were to be assigned RE code 1. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows that on 14 July 2012 he was released from active duty under the provisions of AR 635-200, paragraph 16-7 by reason of reduction in force and assigned an RE code of 3.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013504

    Original file (20110013504.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 635-200 also states, in pertinent part, that prior to discharge or release from active duty Soldiers will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. For Soldiers separated on or after 1 October 1988 this code reflects that separation was the result of an early release program and the Soldier was fully qualified to reenlist. The correct RE code is 2B.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008380

    Original file (20140008380.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The company commander stated the applicant received an Article 15 for changing his sick call slip disposition to show his duty status as sick-in-quarters for 24 hours, striking another Soldier with his fist, missing prime-time training, being insubordinate, and failing to be at his appointed place of duty on three occasions. His DD Form 214 shows he was honorably discharged on 16 October 1991 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 16-5b, by reason of a locally-imposed...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001061475C070421

    Original file (2001061475C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that his DD Form 214 incorrectly shows he was released from active duty due to “Failure of Selection – Permanent Promotion”. His DD Form 214 shows he was released from active duty under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-100, chapter 3, section XXVI, for failure of selection – permanent promotion. Army Regulation 135-215 (Officer Periods of Service on Active Duty) provides for officers of the Reserve Components to serve on extended active duty.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2000 | 2000048088

    Original file (2000048088.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 4 November 1989, the applicant acknowledged notification, consulted legal counsel and stated that he would submit an appeal. EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant AR Number: 2000048088 INDEX NUMBERS: A0720 Date of Review: 001106 A0500 Character of Service: HD A9445 Date of Discharge: 900928 A0100 Authority: AR 635-200 C16 Reason: A0400 Results of Board Action/ Vote/Affirmation: NC 5-0 A Name Reason Characterization...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068288C070402

    Original file (2002068288C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: Soldiers whose continued service is not warranted receive a QMP bar to reenlistment. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded: