Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019802
Original file (20090019802.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090019802 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was authorized severance pay under the Reduction in Authorized Strength - Qualitative Early Transition Program.

2.  The applicant states his separation was involuntary and therefore he should have received severance pay upon discharge.

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 10 October 1975.  He was awarded the military occupational specialty of materiel storage and handling specialist.  The highest rank/grade he held was staff sergeant/E-6.

3.  He served continuously on active duty.  On 13 December 1989, he was notified per memorandum that he was being barred from reenlistment under the Department of the Army (DA)-Imposed Bar to Reenlistment under the Qualitative Management Program (QMP).  The memorandum stated that he had the option to appeal this decision. 

4.  On 20 September 1990, the applicant's appeal of the DA imposed Bar to Reenlistment was disapproved.

5.  The applicant was honorably discharged from active duty on 31 December 1990.  His DD Form 214 shows he completed 15 years, 2 months, and 21 days of creditable active service.

6.  Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Separations), sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Paragraph 16-8 (Early separation due to reduction in force, strength limitations, or budgetary constraints) provides that Soldiers may be separated prior to expiration of term of service or period for which ordered to active duty when specifically authorized when authorization limitations, strength restrictions, or budgetary constraints require the size of the enlisted force to be reduced, the Secretary of the Army, or his designee, will authorize voluntary or involuntary early separation under the authority of 10 U.S. Code 1169 or 1171.  The Commander, Personnel Command, will implement this program by issuing separation instructions pertaining to a specific class or category of Soldiers.  Early separation under this paragraph is for the convenience of the Government.

7.  Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 1332.29, June 20, 1991, paragraph 3.1., Full Separation Pay (Non-disability), states that full payment of non-disability separation pay is authorized to members of the Regular and Reserve components involuntarily separated from active duty who meet each of the following conditions: 

	a.  The member is on active duty or full-time National Guard duty and has completed at least 6 years, but fewer than 20 years, of active service.  A period of active duty is continuous if any break in military service does not exceed 30 days;

	b.  The Service member's separation is characterized as "Honorable"; and
	c.  The Service member is being involuntarily separated by the Military Service concerned through either the denial of reenlistment or the denial of continuation on active duty.

8.  DoDI 1332.29, June 20, 1991, paragraph 5 states that this Instruction was effective immediately.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The applicant was notified of his DA imposed bar to reenlistment.  His appeal of the imposed bar was disapproved.  He was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 16-8.  At the time of his discharge there were no provisions for separation pay for enlisted Soldiers discharged under this authority.  As such, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request. 

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ___x_____  __x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   _x______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090019802



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090019802



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025768

    Original file (20100025768.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His military personnel record contains a U.S. Army Enlisted Records and Evaluation Center memorandum, dated 5 April 1993, Subject: Department of the Army (DA) Imposed Bar to Reenlistment Under the Qualitative Management Program (QMP). The TERA policy in effect at the time of his separation did not provide for allowing Soldiers who faced involuntary separation under QMP to retire under the TERA provisions. The evidence of record confirms he was properly separated, by reason of reduction in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9509703C070209

    Original file (9509703C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 18 April 1978, he enlisted in the Regular Army, in pay grade E-1, for 3 years. On 24 January 1992, the commander indicated that he had presented the notification of the DA bar to reenlistment, explained the available options, and counseled the applicant on his rights, the provisions of the Enlisted Qualitative Early Separation Program, and Army Regulation 635-200. Soldiers whose continued service is not warranted receive a QMP bar to reenlistment.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009565

    Original file (20140009565.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). This document notified him that the Calendar Year 1988 Master SGT/SGT QMP Selection Board reviewed his official military personnel file (OMPF), and after a comprehensive review, the board considered his record of service including performance and future potential for retention in the Army, and barred him from reenlistment. He was informed that: * separation proceedings must be initiated no later...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020953

    Original file (20110020953.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of item 23 (Type of Separation) on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he was retired from active duty by reason of physical disability. The DD Form 214 for this period indicates he completed 3 years of active military service. His military personnel record contains a U.S. Army Enlisted Records and Evaluation Center memorandum, dated 31 August 2000, Subject: Department of the Army (DA) Imposed Bar to Reenlistment...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013504

    Original file (20110013504.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 635-200 also states, in pertinent part, that prior to discharge or release from active duty Soldiers will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. For Soldiers separated on or after 1 October 1988 this code reflects that separation was the result of an early release program and the Soldier was fully qualified to reenlist. The correct RE code is 2B.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071430C070402

    Original file (2002071430C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT STATES : In effect, that he was unjustly barred from reenlistment under the Qualitative Management Program (QMP) and was denied any severance pay for his many years of service. Soldiers who are denied reenlistment are authorized one-half separation pay. At the time the applicant separated from the service, there were no provisions to authorize severance pay to enlisted personnel and the implementing instructions that subsequently authorized severance pay to enlisted personnel,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000340C070206

    Original file (20050000340C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 14 December 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20050000340 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Michael J. Flynn | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. A 1 November 1991 memorandum informed the applicant that a Department of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070006654

    Original file (20070006654.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 9 October 1992, the applicant was discharged under the provision of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 16-8 by reason of “Reduction in Authorized Strength – Qualitative Early Transition Program.” He was assigned a separation code of JCC and a reenlistment eligibility code of RE-4. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. He was barred from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060005901C070205

    Original file (20060005901C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Calendar Year 1991 Master Sergeant Selection Board reviewed the applicant’s Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) and determined that he would be barred from reenlistment under the Qualitative Management Program (QMP). On 31 January 1992, the applicant was honorably discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 16, by reason of reduction in authorized force – qualitative early transition program. At the time of his discharge the applicant had completed 10 years,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013997C070205

    Original file (20060013997C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his record be corrected by changing the authority for his discharge and his reentry (RE) Code. On 31 May 1999 the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 16-8. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge.