IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 11 August 2011
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100029197
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests his lieutenant colonel (LTC) date of rank (DOR) be adjusted to 1 February 2010.
2. The applicant states his commanders guidance was to submit his packet for immediate promotion into the vacant LTC executive officer position upon release of the promotion list on 21 January 2010. He claims the promotion packet was submitted on 24 January 2010, and his unit began movement on a deployment to Kuwait/Iraq. The packet was misplaced and it was resubmitted while they were in Kuwait. They completed training and moved into Iraq and the promotion packet still had not been processed. The packet was resubmitted on 14 March 2010, and he was promoted on 21 June 2010 into the vacant position that had existed the entire time his packet had been lost.
3. The applicant provides:
* A memorandum from his commander, dated 20 October 2010
* State promotion orders to LTC effective 11 June 2010, dated the same
* State amendment orders, dated 28 June 2010
* National Guard Bureau promotion orders to LTC, dated 21 June 2010
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. While serving as a member of the Tennessee Army National Guard (TNARNG), the applicant was selected for promotion to LTC by the Headquarters, Department of the Army, LTC promotion selection board that was posted on or about 21 January 2010.
2. Orders 162-815, issued by the TNARNG, dated 11 June 2010, promoted the applicant to LTC, effective 11 June 2010 as a "Vacancy Promotion." On
21 June 2010, he was federally recognized in that grade by the National Guard Bureau (NGB). Orders 179-800, issued by the TNARNG, dated 28 June 2010, amended Orders 162-815 to read "DA Select Promotion" instead of a "Vacancy Promotion."
3. The commander of the 278th Armored Cavalry Regiment, TNARNG provides a Memorandum for Record, dated 20 October 2010, that recommends the applicants LTC DOR be adjusted because of delays in the promotion process due to no fault of the applicant. The commander verifies the position the applicant was promoted into was vacant at the time of the posting of the promotion board results in January 2010 and it was his guidance to immediately promote the applicant into the vacant executive officer position. He further confirms that due to troop movements in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom, the applicants promotion packet was delayed.
4. In connection with the processing of this case, on 6 July 2011, an advisory opinion was obtained from the Acting Personnel Policy Chief, NGB. The advisory official confirms the applicant was selected for promotion to LTC and identified on the promotion list posted on 21 January 2010. He further states the position in which the applicant was promoted was vacant at the time the promotion list was published and that it was the commanders intent to promote the applicant into that position immediately upon publication of the promotion list. The advisory official further confirms that due to troop movements as part of Operation Iraqi Freedom and administrative error, the applicant's promotion was delayed until 21 June 2010, through no fault of the applicant. He recommends the effective date of the applicants promotion be changed to 1 February 2010.
5. On 6 July 2011, the applicant was provided a copy of the NGB advisory opinion for information and to allow him the opportunity to submit comments or a rebuttal. He did not respond.
6. Army Regulation 135-155 (Promotion of Commissioned Officers and Warrant Officers Other Than General Officers) prescribes policy and procedures used for selecting and promoting commissioned officers (other than commissioned warrant officers) of the Army National Guard of the United States (ARNGUS) and of commissioned and warrant officers (WO) of the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR). Paragraph 4-21 provides guidance on promotion effective dates. It states in the case of unit officers the effective date and date of promotion will be the date of assignment to the higher graded position.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicants request to change his promotion date to 1 February 2010 has been carefully considered and found to have merit.
2. The evidence of record confirms the applicant was selected for promotion to LTC and he was placed on the promotion list published on 21 January 2010. It further confirms the applicants commander recommended his immediate promotion based on his placement in a vacant LTC position as the units executive officer, and that the initial promotion packet was submitted on
24 January 2010. It is further clear that the initial packet and subsequent packets were misplaced, lost, or not timely processed which delayed the applicants promotion until 21 June 2010. This delay of his promotion was the result of unit deployment and administrative error and was through no fault of the applicant.
3. By regulation, the effective date and date of promotion for unit officers will be the date of assignment to the higher-graded position. Therefore, given the unit commander and NGB confirm the applicant was assigned to the higher-graded position on 1 February 2010, it would be appropriate and serve the interest of justice and equity to correct effective date and DOR of the applicants promotion to LTC to 1 February 2010. As a result of this correction, he is also entitled to all back pay and allowances due.
BOARD VOTE:
____X____ ____X____ ____X____ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:
a. correcting the effective date and DOR of his promotion to LTC to
1 February 2010, with Federal recognition effective that date, and
b. paying him all back pay and allowances due as a result of this correction.
___________X___________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100029197
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100029197
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000396
The applicant provides: * UVP packet * Officer Record Brief * promotion orders, dated 29 July 2013 * DD Form 149 (Application for Correction of Military Record), dated 2 August 2013 * email correspondence * sworn statement CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. TNARNG Orders 210-811, dated 29 July 2013, promoted him to CPT effective 1 July 2013. He completed a UVP packet for the applicant and forwarded it for processing on 25 July 2012. c. On 27 July 2012, he was informed that the applicant had...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016374
Had his subsequent delinquent OER been completed in a timely fashion, he would have been promoted after 26 August 2010. c. On 22 March 2010, he emailed his battalion commander, battalion executive officer, and battalion S-3 in reference to his promotion to captain. The applicant provides: * email correspondence * promotion packet, dated May 2010 * OER for the period 1 March 2009 through 28 February 2010 * DA mandatory promotion board notification * OER for the period 1 March 2010 through 16...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029934
The applicant is a current member of the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR), on active duty in the AGR Program. The applicant provides: a. The evidence of record does not support the existence of vacant AGR O-5 positions within his proximity of assignment at the 90th RRC that he could have been reassigned to at the time the FY08 LTC AGR Promotion Selection Board results were approved.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060003018C070205
The applicant's military service records contain a "Corrected Copy" of State of New Hampshire, The Adjutant General, Concord, New Hampshire, Orders 202-004, dated 21 July 2005, that show, in pertinent part, he was promoted to the grade of rank of LTC (O-5), effective and with a DOR of 21 July 2005. This document shows, in pertinent part, that ARNG officers mobilized under the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, sections 12301(a), 12302, and 12304, and who are on an approved...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007083
The applicant requests: * the "1994" (i.e., 1996) nonselection letter be removed from his Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR) * his date of rank (DOR) to captain (CPT) be restored to 1996 * his DOR to major (MAJ) be adjusted * he be promoted to lieutenant colonel (LTC) * any non-mandatory education requirements such as the Command and General Staff Officers Course (CGSOC) be waived for promotion to LTC, if necessary 2. His records contain a memorandum, dated 1 March 1996, issued by...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120018545
An NGB Form 89 (Proceedings of a Federal Recognition Examining Board (FREB)), dated 31 July 2008, shows an FREB recommended he be granted Federal recognition as a LTC/O-5 in the OHARNG. A second NGB Form 89, dated 17 October 2008, shows a second FREB recommended that he be granted federal recognition as a LTC/O-5 in the OHARNG. The available evidence does not support the applicant's request for correction of his record to show he received Federal recognition in the rank/grade of LTC/O-5 on...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110008370
The applicant provides: * a DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report), dated 12 October 2007 * Orders 225-802, dated 13 August 2010, issued by the Tennessee Army National Guard (TNARNG), Joint Force Headquarters (JFH) * Orders, 242-800, and Orders, 242-802, both dated 30 August 2010, issued by TNARNG, JFH * an ARNG Position and Paragraph Number sheet for CW5 * an NGB Form 89 (Proceedings of a Federal Recognition Examining Board), dated 12 August 2010 * an NGB memorandum,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012048
Officers who are Federally recognized in a particular grade and branch shall be tendered an appointment in the same grade as Reserve commissioned officers of the Army with assignment to the ARNG of the United States if they have not already accepted such appointment. d. Paragraph 10-15b states temporary FEDREC may be granted by an Federal Recognition Board (FREB) to those eligible when the board finds that the member has successfully passed the examination prescribed herein, has subscribed...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004741
The applicant states the Discussions and Conclusions portion of his previous Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) Record of Proceedings noted he had signed a letter requesting a delay in promotion on 19 February 2009 after mobilizing and that there was no evidence showing exactly when he accepted promotion. The NGB recommended the applicant's DOR and effective date of promotion to LTC be corrected to 11 February 2009, the date of his mobilization under the provisions of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014654
In support of her request the applicant provides an NGB Form 62E (Application for FEDREC as an ARNG Officer or Warrant Officer and Appointment as a Reserve Commissioned Officer or Warrant Officer of the Army in the ARNGUS), dated 17 January 2013, with enclosures pertaining to the applicant that included: * Orders 341-505, issued by Joint Force Headquarters, Alabama National Guard, Montgomery, AL, dated 6 December 2012, that transferred her from the ALARNG to the TNARNG as an IST effective 5...